Muheremu Aikeremujiang, Niu Xiaohui, Wu Zhongyan, Muhanmode Yilixiati, Tian Wei
Department of Orthopedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital, 31 Xinjiekou East Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100035, China,
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S87-100. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1469-1. Epub 2014 May 5.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been used as a gold standard for the treatment of cervical spondylosis, but it may cause complications such as pseudarthrosis and junctional degeneration. Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) may help overcome such problems, but there are inconsistencies among the published literature on its effectiveness comparing with ACDF.
We searched "PubMed" (2000.1-2013.10), "Medline" (2000.1-2013.10), "Elsevier" (2000.1-2013.10), Cochrane library (2008.1-2013.10) databases with the key words of "cervical disk arthroplasy", "CDA", "anterior cervical disk fusion", "ACDF", "cervical", "randomized controlled study", "RCT" and searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of ACDF and CDA for the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Neck disability index (NDI), VAS arm pain score, VAS neck pain score, ROM of the adjacent level, SF36-PCS score, SF36-MCS score and patient satisfaction were calculated by Revman5.2 software.
From 1,400 papers found, we chose 18 randomized controlled trials and cohorts evaluating the efficacy of CDA and ACDF on symptomatic cerebral spondylosis. The total number of patients is 3,056, in which 1,576 were in the CDA group and 1,480 were in the ACDF group. The CDA group demonstrated better results than the ACDF group concerning VAS arm pain score 1, 2, 4 years after the surgery, VAS neck pain score 1, 2, 4 years after the surgery, ROM of the adjacent level 1 and 2 years after the surgery, patient satisfaction 1, 2, 4 years after the surgery, NDI scores 1, 2, 4 years after the surgery, SF36-PCS score 1 and 2 years after the surgery and SF36-MCS score at 1 and 4 years after the surgery. There are no significant differences between the groups concerning SF36-PCS score 4 years after the surgery and SF36-MCS score at 2 years after the surgery.
CDA can be an effective alternative method to ACDF for the treatment of cervical spondylosis.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)一直被用作治疗颈椎病的金标准,但它可能会引发诸如假关节形成和节段性退变等并发症。颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)或许有助于克服此类问题,但已发表的关于其与ACDF疗效比较的文献存在不一致之处。
我们在“PubMed”(2000.1 - 2013.10)、“Medline”(2000.1 - 2013.10)、“Elsevier”(2000.1 - 2013.10)、Cochrane图书馆(2008.1 - 2013.10)数据库中,以“颈椎间盘置换术”、“CDA”、“颈椎前路椎间盘融合术”、“ACDF”、“颈椎”、“随机对照研究”、“RCT”为关键词进行检索,查找比较ACDF和CDA治疗颈椎病疗效的随机对照试验。通过Revman5.2软件计算颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、上肢VAS疼痛评分、颈部VAS疼痛评分、相邻节段活动度、SF36-PCS评分、SF36-MCS评分及患者满意度。
从检索到的1400篇论文中,我们选取了18项评估CDA和ACDF对有症状颈椎病疗效的随机对照试验及队列研究。患者总数为3056例,其中CDA组1576例,ACDF组1480例。在术后1年、2年、4年的上肢VAS疼痛评分、术后1年、2年、4年的颈部VAS疼痛评分、术后1年和2年的相邻节段活动度、术后1年、2年、4年的患者满意度、术后1年、2年、4年的NDI评分、术后1年和2年的SF36-PCS评分以及术后1年和4年的SF36-MCS评分方面,CDA组的结果均优于ACDF组。在术后4年的SF36-PCS评分和术后2年的SF36-MCS评分上,两组之间无显著差异。
对于颈椎病的治疗,CDA可作为ACDF的一种有效替代方法。