Walker Timothy J, Brandt Heather M, Wandersman Abraham, Scaccia Jonathan, Lamont Andrea, Workman Lauren, Dias Emanuelle, Diamond Pamela M, Craig Derek W, Fernandez Maria E
Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin St., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Nov 11;1(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00088-4.
Organizational readiness is important for the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Currently, there is a critical need for a comprehensive, valid, reliable, and pragmatic measure of organizational readiness that can be used throughout the implementation process. This study aims to develop a readiness measure that can be used to support implementation in two critical public health settings: federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and schools. The measure is informed by the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation and R = MC heuristic (readiness = motivation × innovation-specific capacity × general capacity). The study aims are to adapt and further develop the readiness measure in FQHCs implementing evidence-based interventions for colorectal cancer screening, to test the validity and reliability of the developed readiness measure in FQHCs, and to adapt and assess the usability and validity of the readiness measure in schools implementing a nutrition-based program.
For aim 1, we will conduct a series of qualitative interviews to adapt the readiness measure for use in FQHCs. We will then distribute the readiness measure to a developmental sample of 100 health center sites (up to 10 staff members per site). We will use a multilevel factor analysis approach to refine the readiness measure. For aim 2, we will distribute the measure to a different sample of 100 health center sites. We will use multilevel confirmatory factor analysis models to examine the structural validity. We will also conduct tests for scale reliability, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. For aim 3, we will use a qualitative approach to adapt the measure for use in schools and conduct reliability and validity tests similar to what is described in aim 2.
This study will rigorously develop a readiness measure that will be applicable across two settings: FQHCs and schools. Information gained from the readiness measure can inform planning and implementation efforts by identifying priority areas. These priority areas can inform the selection and tailoring of support strategies that can be used throughout the implementation process to further improve implementation efforts and, in turn, program effectiveness.
组织准备度对于循证干预措施的实施至关重要。目前,迫切需要一种全面、有效、可靠且实用的组织准备度测量方法,以便在整个实施过程中使用。本研究旨在开发一种准备度测量方法,用于支持在两个关键的公共卫生环境中实施干预措施:联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)和学校。该测量方法以传播与实施的互动系统框架以及R = MC启发式方法(准备度=动机×特定创新能力×一般能力)为依据。研究目的包括在实施结直肠癌筛查循证干预措施的FQHCs中调整并进一步开发准备度测量方法,在FQHCs中测试所开发的准备度测量方法的有效性和可靠性,以及在实施基于营养的项目的学校中调整并评估准备度测量方法的可用性和有效性。
对于目标1,我们将进行一系列定性访谈,以调整准备度测量方法,使其适用于FQHCs。然后,我们将把准备度测量方法分发给100个健康中心站点的发展样本(每个站点最多10名工作人员)。我们将使用多水平因子分析方法来完善准备度测量方法。对于目标2,我们将把该测量方法分发给另一个由100个健康中心站点组成的样本。我们将使用多水平验证性因子分析模型来检验结构效度。我们还将进行量表信度、重测信度和评分者间信度测试。对于目标3,我们将采用定性方法调整该测量方法,使其适用于学校,并进行与目标2中所述类似的信度和效度测试。
本研究将严格开发一种适用于两种环境的准备度测量方法:FQHCs和学校。从准备度测量方法中获得的信息可以通过确定优先领域为规划和实施工作提供参考。这些优先领域可以为支持策略的选择和调整提供参考,这些策略可在整个实施过程中使用,以进一步改进实施工作,进而提高项目效果。