Williams Venice Ng, Knudtson Michael D, Allison Mandy A, Tung Gregory J
Prevention Research Center for Family & Child Health, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Child Health Clinic, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug;60(4):e14457. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14457. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
To examine the association between cross-sector collaboration among Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) home visitors and service providers, and referrals to and use of services.
An observational study of 264 local NFP agencies in 40 states, the US Virgin Islands, DC, and tribal communities was conducted. Random intercept probit regressions examined provider-specific collaboration measures and their relationship with referrals to and use of services with that provider-type, adjusting for client-, nurse-, and agency-level covariates.
Secondary data from NFP implementation from 2015 to 2021 were matched to the 2018-2021 NFP Collaboration with Community Providers panel survey, 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes, and the Index of Concentration at Extremes using 2010 census data. We included clients with their first NFP visit between January 2015 and December 2021 who completed visits through birth and did not cease program participation due to unaddressable reasons (n = 95,489).
Provider-specific coordination with Early Intervention, mental health, crisis intervention, substance use treatment, and child health care promoted service referrals by 1.67% points [CI:1.08, 2.27], 2.14% points [CI:1.22, 3.06], 1.13% points [CI:0.60, 1.65], 0.86% [0.52, 1.21], and 1.13% points [CI:0.13, 2.12] respectively. Provider-specific integration promoted referrals to nutrition and housing resources by 0.08% points [CI:0.03, 0.14] and 0.98% points [CI:0.46, 1.51] respectively. Provider-specific coordination and integration were associated with families' utilization of nutrition by 1.03% points [CI:0.42, 1.65] and 0.21% points [CI:0.08, 0.35], housing resources by 1.28% points [CI:0.05, 2.50] and 0.93% points [CI:0.27, 1.60], Early Intervention by 3.11% points [CI:1.28, 4.94] and 0.45% points [CI:0.02, 0.89], and mental health services by 2.85% points [CI:1.70, 4.01] and 0.24% points [CI:0.03, 0.46]. Provider-specific relational coordination was associated with the use of substance use treatment by 3.19% points [CI:1.06, 5.32] and child health care by 1.47% points [CI:0.70, 2.23].
Strong provider-specific collaboration is associated with increased referrals to and subsequent use of that service among families engaged in nurse home visiting, but this relationship varies by provider type.
研究护士 - 家庭伙伴关系(NFP)家访员与服务提供者之间的跨部门合作,以及服务转介和服务使用之间的关联。
对美国40个州、美属维尔京群岛、华盛顿特区和部落社区的264个地方NFP机构进行了一项观察性研究。随机截距概率回归分析了特定提供者的合作措施及其与向该提供者类型转介服务和使用服务之间的关系,并对客户、护士和机构层面的协变量进行了调整。
2015年至2021年NFP实施的二手数据与2018 - 2021年NFP与社区提供者合作小组调查、2010年城乡通勤区号以及使用2010年人口普查数据的极端集中度指数进行了匹配。我们纳入了在2015年1月至2021年12月期间首次接受NFP家访且在分娩前完成家访且未因无法解决的原因停止项目参与的客户(n = 95,489)。
与早期干预、心理健康、危机干预、物质使用治疗和儿童医疗保健的特定提供者协调分别使服务转介增加了1.67个百分点[置信区间:1.08, 2.27]、2.14个百分点[置信区间:1.22, 3.06]、1.13个百分点[置信区间:0.60, 1.65]、0.86%[0.52, 1.21]和1.13个百分点[置信区间:0.13, 2.12];特定提供者整合分别使向营养和住房资源的转介增加了0.08个百分点[置信区间:0.03, 0.14]和0.98个百分点[置信区间:0.46, 1.51]。特定提供者协调与整合分别使家庭对营养的利用率提高了1.03个百分点[置信区间:0.42, 1.65]和0.21个百分点[置信区间:0.08, 0.35],住房资源利用率提高了1.28个百分点[置信区间:0.05, 2.50]和0.93个百分点[置信区间:0.27, 1.60],早期干预利用率提高了3.11个百分点[置信区间:1.28, 4.94]和0.45个百分点[置信区间:0.02, 0.89],心理健康服务利用率提高了2.85个百分点[置信区间:1.70, 4.01]和0.24个百分点[置信区间:0.03, 0.46]。特定提供者关系协调与物质使用治疗的使用率提高3.19个百分点[置信区间:1.06, 5.32]以及儿童医疗保健的使用率提高1.47个百分点[置信区间:0.70, 2.23]相关。
强大的特定提供者合作与参与护士家访的家庭中该服务的转介增加及后续使用增加相关,但这种关系因提供者类型而异。