Höller Lina F, Höller Sebastian, Jäckle Katharina, Roch Paul Jonathan, Lehmann Wolfgang, Weiser Lukas
Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Apr;34(4):1263-1269. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08700-8. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
Instabilities of the craniocervical junction and the upper cervical spine may necessitate dorsal spinal stabilization to prevent neurological complications, deformities and pain. Among the options available, the implantation of mass or pedicle screws is considered. This study aims to assess the feasibility of pedicle screw placement based on anatomical considerations and its clinical significance.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 210 patients who underwent cervical spine CT scans at a University Medical Center. Pedicle dimensions of the first cervical vertebra and the third to fifth cervical vertebrae were measured bilaterally. The primary endpoint was a pedicle height and width greater than 4 mm, with secondary endpoints including sex-specific and age-specific differences.
Results indicate that approximately 50% of patients had a pedicle height greater than 4 mm in the first cervical vertebra, while for the third to fifth cervical vertebrae, most patients (77.1-100%) had both pedicle height and width exceeding 4 mm. Notably, a significant gender disparity was observed in the pedicle height of the first cervical vertebra, with female patients achieving the required pedicle height in only 39.5% and 29.1% of cases, respectively.
In conclusion, while pedicle screw placement is feasible in every second patient based on the pedicle height of the first cervical vertebra, gender-specific differences must be considered during preoperative planning. In contrast to C1, pedicle screw placement is possible in 70 to 100% of patients in C3 to C5. These findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment strategies in spinal stabilization procedures.
颅颈交界区和上颈椎的不稳定可能需要进行后路脊柱稳定术,以预防神经并发症、畸形和疼痛。在可用的选择中,考虑植入块状或椎弓根螺钉。本研究旨在基于解剖学因素评估椎弓根螺钉置入的可行性及其临床意义。
对在大学医学中心接受颈椎CT扫描的210例患者进行回顾性分析。双侧测量第一颈椎以及第三至第五颈椎的椎弓根尺寸。主要终点是椎弓根高度和宽度大于4毫米,次要终点包括性别和年龄特异性差异。
结果表明,约50%的患者第一颈椎的椎弓根高度大于4毫米,而对于第三至第五颈椎,大多数患者(77.1%-100%)的椎弓根高度和宽度均超过4毫米。值得注意的是,在第一颈椎的椎弓根高度方面观察到显著的性别差异,女性患者分别仅在39.5%和29.1%的病例中达到所需的椎弓根高度。
总之,基于第一颈椎的椎弓根高度,每两名患者中就有一名可行椎弓根螺钉置入,但在术前规划时必须考虑性别差异。与C1不同,C3至C5患者中有70%至100%可行椎弓根螺钉置入。这些发现强调了脊柱稳定手术中个体化治疗策略的重要性。