Suppr超能文献

局部晚期直肠癌术前放化疗及手术前后的化疗:CAO/ARO/AIO-12试验的5年结果——一项一般成对比较

Chemotherapy before or after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: 5-year results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial - a general pairwise comparison.

作者信息

Diefenhardt M, Kosmala R, Fleischmann M, Martin D, Hofheinz R-D, Ghadimi M, Rödel C, Polat B, Fokas E

机构信息

Goethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Frankfurt, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.

University Würzburg, University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2025 Mar;10(3):104483. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104483. Epub 2025 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has been increasingly adopted for multimodal rectal cancer treatment. Here, we present the 5-year results of our CAO/ARO/AIO-12 randomized phase II trial that compared two TNT sequences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were initially randomized 1 : 1 to arm A (induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy) or arm B (chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy) followed by total mesorectal excision surgery. This report on the 5-year results involved a general pairwise comparison (GPC) of the following parameters, ranked as indicated: overall survival, incidence of locoregional recurrence, incidence of distant metastasis, rate of pathological/clinical complete remission, long-term quality of life (at least 24 months after randomization) based on global health assessed by the European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 questionnaire, and incidence of toxicity, ranked by grade, during follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 306 patients were eligible for this analysis. After a median follow-up of 60 months (interquartile range 58-62 months), we found that long-term oncological outcome was comparable in both arms [e.g. 5-year overall survival 85.8% (95% confidence interval 80.2% to 91.8%) in arm A and 84.2% (95% confidence interval 78.2% to 90.5%) in arm B], regardless of whether patients received induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy. The GPC showed no clinically meaningful overall treatment benefit (-1.38%) or win ratio difference (0.97) between the two treatment sequences. The incidence of pathological or sustained clinical complete remission remained higher in patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after adjusting for long-term outcome between both arms (11% versus 6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our 5-year GPC confirmed the 3-year findings that chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy resulted in higher rates of pathological complete remission without compromising oncological outcome, toxicity, or quality of life. The TNT sequence chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy may be preferred for organ preservation strategies.

摘要

背景

全新辅助治疗(TNT)已越来越多地应用于直肠癌的多模式治疗。在此,我们展示了CAO/ARO/AIO-12随机II期试验的5年结果,该试验比较了两种TNT方案。

患者与方法

患者最初按1:1随机分为A组(诱导化疗后进行放化疗)或B组(放化疗后进行巩固化疗),随后进行全直肠系膜切除术。这份关于5年结果的报告涉及以下参数的一般成对比较(GPC),排序如下:总生存期、局部区域复发率、远处转移率、病理/临床完全缓解率、基于欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心30问卷评估的全球健康状况的长期生活质量(随机分组后至少24个月),以及随访期间按等级排序的毒性发生率。

结果

共有306例患者符合该分析条件。中位随访60个月(四分位间距58 - 62个月)后,我们发现两组的长期肿瘤学结局相当[例如,A组5年总生存率为85.8%(95%置信区间80.2%至91.8%),B组为84.2%(95%置信区间78.2%至90.5%)],无论患者接受的是诱导化疗和放化疗还是放化疗和巩固化疗。GPC显示两种治疗方案之间无临床意义上的总体治疗益处(-1.38%)或胜率差异(0.97)。在调整两组之间的长期结局后,巩固化疗患者的病理或持续临床完全缓解率仍然较高(11%对6.5%)。

结论

我们的5年GPC证实了3年的研究结果,即放化疗后进行巩固化疗可导致更高的病理完全缓解率,且不影响肿瘤学结局、毒性或生活质量。对于器官保留策略,TNT方案放化疗/化疗可能更受青睐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4ae/11930669/396e7cb4b0ae/gr2.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验