Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site: Frankfurt, Heidelberg, Germany; Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2024 Oct;210:114291. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114291. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been used for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) is a matter of debate.
We performed a pooled analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA multicenter, randomized phase 2 trials to identify patient subsets that could benefit from one TNT sequence over the other regarding disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomized to CRT (50.4-54 Gy) with either induction (INCT-CRT) or consolidation CT (CRT-CNCT) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (OPRA) followed by mandatory total mesorectal excision (TME) (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) or selective watch-and-wait surveillance (OPRA). 311 and 324 patients were recruited from June 15, 2015 to January 31, 2018; and from April 12, 2014 to March 30, 2020 in the two trials, respectively. Pretreatment clinical and tumor characteristics included were age, sex, ECOG, cT-category, cN-category, clinical UICC stage, location from anal verge, and tumor grade.
In total, 628 eligible patients were included in the pooled analysis (CAO/ARO/AIO-12, n = 304; OPRA, n = 324). Of those, 313 were randomly assigned to the INCT-CRT group, and 315 to the CRT-CNCT group. Median follow-up was 43 months (IQR, 35-49) months in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial and 61,2 months (IQR, 42-68,4) in the OPRA trial. Pooled analysis of baseline clinical and tumor characteristics did not identify any subgroups of patients that would benefit by the one TNT sequence over the other with regard to DFS.
To our knowledge, this is the first pooled analysis of two randomized trials after direct head-to-head comparison of both TNT sequences. Both trials reported higher rates of complete response with CRT-CNCT, and this should be considered the preferred TNT sequence if organ preservation is a priority.
全直肠新辅助治疗(TNT)已用于局部晚期直肠癌患者。放化疗(CRT)和化疗(CT)的最佳顺序仍存在争议。
我们对 CAO/ARO/AIO-12 和 OPRA 多中心、随机 2 期试验进行了汇总分析,以确定在无病生存(DFS)方面,哪种 TNT 序列更适合特定患者。II/III 期直肠癌患者随机分为 CRT(50.4-54Gy),联合诱导(INCT-CRT)或巩固 CT(CRT-CNCT),采用氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸、奥沙利铂(CAO/ARO/AIO-12 和 OPRA)或卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(OPRA),然后进行强制性全直肠系膜切除术(TME)(CAO/ARO/AIO-12)或选择性观察和等待监测(OPRA)。这两项试验分别于 2015 年 6 月 15 日和 2018 年 1 月 31 日、2014 年 4 月 12 日和 2020 年 3 月 30 日招募了 311 例和 324 例患者。预处理的临床和肿瘤特征包括年龄、性别、ECOG、cT 分期、cN 分期、临床 UICC 分期、肛门距离、肿瘤分级。
共有 628 例符合条件的患者纳入汇总分析(CAO/ARO/AIO-12,n=304;OPRA,n=324)。其中,313 例随机分配至 INCT-CRT 组,315 例分配至 CRT-CNCT 组。CAO/ARO/AIO-12 试验中位随访时间为 43 个月(IQR,35-49),OPRA 试验中位随访时间为 61.2 个月(IQR,42-68.4)。CAO/ARO/AIO-12 试验的汇总分析显示,在 DFS 方面,两种 TNT 序列之间没有任何亚组患者可以受益于其中一种。
据我们所知,这是在对两种 TNT 序列进行直接头对头比较后,首次对两项随机试验进行汇总分析。两项试验均报告 CRT-CNCT 完全缓解率更高,如果器官保存是首要目标,这应该是首选的 TNT 序列。