Guo Yugang
School of Physical Education, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, Henan, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93038-w.
This study examines the relationship between Big Five personality traits and aggression in physical education students, with particular attention to gender differences in aggressive behaviors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sampling method to recruit physical education undergraduates aged 18-24. an online questionnaire was distributed via WeChat groups, yielding 410 valid responses (94% effective response rate) from students in Henan, China (245 males, 165 females). Participants completed the Big Five Personality Short Form Scale and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation, one-way ANOVA, and hierarchical regression models, were performed to examine the relationship between personality traits and various types of aggression, as well as to explore gender-specific patterns. Gender differences were found in the types of aggression exhibited by male and female students. Male students showed significantly higher levels of physical aggression (mean = 1.82, SD = 0.66) compared to female students (mean = 1.57, SD = 0.53), with a significant difference (t = 4.254, p < 0.001). Conversely, female students scored significantly higher in anger (mean = 2.15, SD = 0.75) than male students (mean = 1.97, SD = 0.74), with a significant difference (t = - 2.423, p < 0.01). In terms of personality traits, neuroticism was positively associated with general aggression, anger, and hostility, supporting previous research that links emotional instability with aggressive behavior. Agreeableness was negatively correlated with physical aggression, and conscientiousness was linked to lower levels of verbal aggression. Notably, individuals with high extraversion and low conscientiousness exhibited the highest tendency for verbal aggression, highlighting the synergistic effects of personality trait combinations. Together, these personality traits explained 12.2% of the variance in aggression, emphasizing the significant role of personality in predicting aggression in physical education contexts. These findings suggest that both personality traits and gender contribute to aggressive behaviors. Specifically, male students with lower agreeableness are more likely to exhibit physical aggression, while female students with higher neuroticism tend to exhibit more anger. The "high extraversion-low conscientiousness" trait combination emerged as a key predictor of verbal aggression, underscoring the importance of addressing personality trait interactions in intervention design.Interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation, agreeableness, and conscientiousness could be particularly effective in reducing aggression. Tailoring strategies to address gender differences in aggression could further enhance the effectiveness of these interventions.
本研究考察了体育专业学生的大五人格特质与攻击性之间的关系,尤其关注攻击行为中的性别差异。采用便利抽样法进行横断面研究,招募年龄在18 - 24岁的体育专业本科生。通过微信群发放在线问卷,共收到来自中国河南学生的410份有效回复(有效回复率为94%)(男性245名,女性165名)。参与者完成了大五人格简式量表和布斯 - 佩里攻击性问卷(BPAQ)。进行了包括皮尔逊相关性分析、单因素方差分析和层次回归模型在内的统计分析,以检验人格特质与各类攻击行为之间的关系,并探索性别特异性模式。发现男女生表现出的攻击类型存在性别差异。男生的身体攻击水平显著高于女生(均值 = 1.82,标准差 = 0.66),女生的身体攻击水平均值为1.57,标准差 = 0.53,差异显著(t = 4.254,p < 0.001)。相反,女生的愤怒得分显著高于男生(均值 = 2.15,标准差 = 0.75),男生的愤怒得分均值为1.97,标准差 = 0.74,差异显著(t = - 2.423,p < 0.01)。在人格特质方面,神经质与一般攻击、愤怒和敌意呈正相关,支持了先前将情绪不稳定与攻击行为联系起来的研究。宜人性与身体攻击呈负相关,尽责性与言语攻击水平较低有关。值得注意的是,外向性高且尽责性低的个体表现出最高的言语攻击倾向,凸显了人格特质组合的协同效应。这些人格特质共同解释了攻击行为中12.2%的变异,强调了人格在预测体育教育情境中攻击行为方面的重要作用。这些发现表明,人格特质和性别都对攻击行为有影响。具体而言,宜人性较低的男生更有可能表现出身体攻击,而神经质较高的女生往往表现出更多愤怒。“高外向性 - 低尽责性”特质组合成为言语攻击的关键预测因素,强调了在干预设计中考虑人格特质相互作用的重要性。旨在改善情绪调节、宜人性和尽责性的干预措施在减少攻击行为方面可能特别有效。针对攻击行为中的性别差异量身定制策略可以进一步提高这些干预措施的有效性。