• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gender differences in the relationship between big five personality traits and aggression among physical education students.体育专业学生中,大五人格特质与攻击性之间关系的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93038-w.
2
Incremental prediction and moderating role of the perceived emotional intelligence over aggressive behavior.渐进式预测与感知情绪智力对攻击行为的调节作用。
Span J Psychol. 2014;17:E15. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.17.
3
The big five personality traits and eating habits among female students at Zayed University.扎耶德大学女学生的大五人格特质与饮食习惯
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 15;12:1490634. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1490634. eCollection 2024.
4
Personality Traits and Aggressive Behavior in Vietnamese Adolescents.越南青少年的人格特质与攻击行为
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 May 31;16:1987-2003. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S405379. eCollection 2023.
5
Trait aggression is associated with five-factor personality traits in males.特质攻击性与男性的五大人格特质有关。
Brain Behav. 2021 Jul;11(7):e02175. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2175. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Big five personality traits of medical students and workplace performance in the final clerkship year using an EPA framework.医学生的五大人格特质与最终实习年的工作表现,采用 EPA 框架。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05434-x.
7
Personality traits and their relationship with oral health related quality of life among adolescents in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯青少年的人格特质及其与口腔健康相关生活质量的关系。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05503-7.
8
Learning burnout and its association with perceived stress, social support, and the Big Five personality traits in Chinese medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,中国医学生的学习倦怠及其与感知压力、社会支持和大五人格特质的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04453-6.
9
Personality and interest in general practice: results from an online survey among medical students.个性与对全科医学的兴趣:医学生在线调查结果
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 12;25(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02682-0.
10
The validity of physical aggression in predicting adolescent academic performance.身体攻击行为在预测青少年学业成绩方面的有效性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Mar;77(Pt 1):167-76. doi: 10.1348/000709905X79563.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality Traits and Aggressive Behavior in Vietnamese Adolescents.越南青少年的人格特质与攻击行为
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 May 31;16:1987-2003. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S405379. eCollection 2023.
2
The Effect of a Theory-Based Educational Intervention on Reducing Aggressive Behavior among Male Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study.基于理论的教育干预对减少男学生攻击性行为的效果:一项随机对照试验研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 23;2022:6308929. doi: 10.1155/2022/6308929. eCollection 2022.
3
How the Big Five personality traits related to aggression from perspectives of the benign and malicious envy.从良性和恶意嫉妒的角度看五大人格特质与攻击性的关系。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Aug 18;10(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00906-5.
4
The Relationship of Personality, Emotional Intelligence, and Aggressiveness in Students: A Study Using the Big Five Personality Questionnaire for Children and Adults (BFQ-NA).学生的人格、情商与攻击性之间的关系:一项使用儿童和成人大五人格问卷(BFQ-NA)的研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Dec 25;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11010001.
5
Gender Differences in the Relationship between Anger and Aggressive Behavior.愤怒与攻击行为关系中的性别差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP12661-NP12670. doi: 10.1177/0886260521991870. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Gender Differences in the Personality Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in a Spanish Sample of Young Adults.西班牙青年群体中反应性攻击和主动性攻击的人格相关性的性别差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4082-NP4107. doi: 10.1177/0886260520957697. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
7
Facet-level analysis of the relations between personality and laboratory aggression.人格与实验室攻击行为关系的层面分析。
Aggress Behav. 2020 May;46(3):266-277. doi: 10.1002/ab.21887. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
Gender differences in aggression.攻击性的性别差异。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
The personality basis of aggression: The mediating role of anger and the moderating role of emotional intelligence.攻击行为的人格基础:愤怒的中介作用与情商的调节作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Aug;58(4):333-340. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12367. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Evidence of Big Five and Aggressive Personalities in Gait Biomechanics.大五人格和攻击性人格在步态生物力学中的证据。
J Nonverbal Behav. 2017;41(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s10919-016-0240-1. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

体育专业学生中,大五人格特质与攻击性之间关系的性别差异。

Gender differences in the relationship between big five personality traits and aggression among physical education students.

作者信息

Guo Yugang

机构信息

School of Physical Education, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, Henan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93038-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-93038-w
PMID:40057528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11890549/
Abstract

This study examines the relationship between Big Five personality traits and aggression in physical education students, with particular attention to gender differences in aggressive behaviors. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sampling method to recruit physical education undergraduates aged 18-24. an online questionnaire was distributed via WeChat groups, yielding 410 valid responses (94% effective response rate) from students in Henan, China (245 males, 165 females). Participants completed the Big Five Personality Short Form Scale and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation, one-way ANOVA, and hierarchical regression models, were performed to examine the relationship between personality traits and various types of aggression, as well as to explore gender-specific patterns. Gender differences were found in the types of aggression exhibited by male and female students. Male students showed significantly higher levels of physical aggression (mean = 1.82, SD = 0.66) compared to female students (mean = 1.57, SD = 0.53), with a significant difference (t = 4.254, p < 0.001). Conversely, female students scored significantly higher in anger (mean = 2.15, SD = 0.75) than male students (mean = 1.97, SD = 0.74), with a significant difference (t =  - 2.423, p < 0.01). In terms of personality traits, neuroticism was positively associated with general aggression, anger, and hostility, supporting previous research that links emotional instability with aggressive behavior. Agreeableness was negatively correlated with physical aggression, and conscientiousness was linked to lower levels of verbal aggression. Notably, individuals with high extraversion and low conscientiousness exhibited the highest tendency for verbal aggression, highlighting the synergistic effects of personality trait combinations. Together, these personality traits explained 12.2% of the variance in aggression, emphasizing the significant role of personality in predicting aggression in physical education contexts. These findings suggest that both personality traits and gender contribute to aggressive behaviors. Specifically, male students with lower agreeableness are more likely to exhibit physical aggression, while female students with higher neuroticism tend to exhibit more anger. The "high extraversion-low conscientiousness" trait combination emerged as a key predictor of verbal aggression, underscoring the importance of addressing personality trait interactions in intervention design.Interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation, agreeableness, and conscientiousness could be particularly effective in reducing aggression. Tailoring strategies to address gender differences in aggression could further enhance the effectiveness of these interventions.

摘要

本研究考察了体育专业学生的大五人格特质与攻击性之间的关系,尤其关注攻击行为中的性别差异。采用便利抽样法进行横断面研究,招募年龄在18 - 24岁的体育专业本科生。通过微信群发放在线问卷,共收到来自中国河南学生的410份有效回复(有效回复率为94%)(男性245名,女性165名)。参与者完成了大五人格简式量表和布斯 - 佩里攻击性问卷(BPAQ)。进行了包括皮尔逊相关性分析、单因素方差分析和层次回归模型在内的统计分析,以检验人格特质与各类攻击行为之间的关系,并探索性别特异性模式。发现男女生表现出的攻击类型存在性别差异。男生的身体攻击水平显著高于女生(均值 = 1.82,标准差 = 0.66),女生的身体攻击水平均值为1.57,标准差 = 0.53,差异显著(t = 4.254,p < 0.001)。相反,女生的愤怒得分显著高于男生(均值 = 2.15,标准差 = 0.75),男生的愤怒得分均值为1.97,标准差 = 0.74,差异显著(t = - 2.423,p < 0.01)。在人格特质方面,神经质与一般攻击、愤怒和敌意呈正相关,支持了先前将情绪不稳定与攻击行为联系起来的研究。宜人性与身体攻击呈负相关,尽责性与言语攻击水平较低有关。值得注意的是,外向性高且尽责性低的个体表现出最高的言语攻击倾向,凸显了人格特质组合的协同效应。这些人格特质共同解释了攻击行为中12.2%的变异,强调了人格在预测体育教育情境中攻击行为方面的重要作用。这些发现表明,人格特质和性别都对攻击行为有影响。具体而言,宜人性较低的男生更有可能表现出身体攻击,而神经质较高的女生往往表现出更多愤怒。“高外向性 - 低尽责性”特质组合成为言语攻击的关键预测因素,强调了在干预设计中考虑人格特质相互作用的重要性。旨在改善情绪调节、宜人性和尽责性的干预措施在减少攻击行为方面可能特别有效。针对攻击行为中的性别差异量身定制策略可以进一步提高这些干预措施的有效性。