Huberts-Bosch Annick, Bierens Margreet, Rucklidge Julia J, Ly Verena, Donders Rogier, van de Loo-Neus Gigi H H, Arias-Vasquez Alejandro, Klip Helen, Buitelaar Jan K, van den Berg Saskia W, Rommelse Nanda N
Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Nijmegen The Netherlands.
University of Canterbury School of Psychology, Speech and Hearing Christchurch New Zealand.
JCPP Adv. 2024 Jul 8;5(1):e12257. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12257. eCollection 2025 Mar.
An Elimination Diet (ED) or Healthy Diet (HD) may be effective in reducing symptoms of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), but long-term maintenance effects and feasibility have never been examined.
One-year prospective follow-up of a sample of 165 children (5-12 years) with ADHD randomized (unblinded; 1:1) to 5 weeks treatment with either ED ( = 84) or HD ( = 81) and a non-randomized comparator arm including 58 children being treated with Care as Usual (CAU). Dietary participants were allowed to add or switch to CAU treatment after 5 weeks. The primary outcome was a 5-point ordinal measure of improvement based on both parent and teacher ratings on ADHD and dysregulation problems, determined after 1 year prospective follow-up. Ordinal regression analyses and linear mixed models analyses were conducted on an intention to treat basis. In addition, as-treated analyses were performed. The trial is closed and registered in the Dutch trial registry, number NL5324.
At 1 year follow-up, 24% of the participants still complied with the ED and 37% still complied with the HD. In the ED (+CAU) trajectory, fewer participants showed (partial) improvement after 1-year prospective follow-up compared to the HD (+CAU) trajectory (47% vs. 64%, χ (4, = 152) = 11.97, = 0.018). The HD (+CAU) - but not ED (+CAU) - trajectory had comparable 1-year outcomes compared to the non-randomized CAU-trajectory. Results for secondary outcomes (e.g. health, parental stress) did not differ between the ED (+CAU) and HD (+CAU) trajectories. The prevalence of psychostimulant use was lower in the ED (+CAU) and HD (+CAU) trajectories compared to the non-randomized CAU-trajectory (38%, 45%, 78%, respectively). Predictors for long-term benefit from dietary treatments included high initial severity of ADHD problems, low severity of emotional problems and sufficient parental mental resources.
In line with the short-term effects, prospective 1-year follow-up outcomes are in favor of treatment with HD and not ED. Initial 5-week treatment with HD and if needed/preferred followed by CAU may reduce psychostimulant use without negatively impacting 1-year outcomes.
排除饮食法(ED)或健康饮食法(HD)可能有助于减轻注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的症状,但长期维持效果和可行性尚未得到研究。
对165名5至12岁的ADHD儿童样本进行为期一年的前瞻性随访,这些儿童被随机(非盲法;1:1)分为两组,一组接受5周的ED治疗(n = 84),另一组接受5周的HD治疗(n = 81),还有一个非随机对照臂,包括58名接受常规护理(CAU)治疗的儿童。饮食干预组的参与者在5周后可以添加或改用CAU治疗。主要结局是基于家长和教师对ADHD及调节障碍问题的评分得出的5分序数改善指标,在为期一年的前瞻性随访后确定。采用意向性分析进行序数回归分析和线性混合模型分析。此外,还进行了实际治疗分析。该试验已结束,并在荷兰试验注册中心注册,注册号为NL5324。
在1年随访时,24%的参与者仍遵循ED饮食,37%的参与者仍遵循HD饮食。与HD(+CAU)组相比,在ED(+CAU)组中,经过1年的前瞻性随访后,显示(部分)改善的参与者更少(47%对64%,χ²(4, N = 152) = 11.97,P = 0.018)。与非随机CAU组相比,HD(+CAU)组——而非ED(+CAU)组——具有相当的1年结局。ED(+CAU)组和HD(+CAU)组在次要结局(如健康、父母压力)方面的结果没有差异。与非随机CAU组相比,ED(+CAU)组和HD(+CAU)组使用精神兴奋剂的比例较低(分别为38%、45%、78%)。饮食治疗长期获益的预测因素包括ADHD问题的初始严重程度高、情绪问题的严重程度低以及父母有足够的心理资源。
与短期效果一致,为期1年的前瞻性随访结果支持HD治疗而非ED治疗。最初进行5周的HD治疗,如有需要/愿意,随后采用CAU治疗,可能会减少精神兴奋剂的使用,且不会对1年结局产生负面影响。