Çelik Fatma, Ayyıldız Aylin, İnceoğlu Selda Çiftci, Yılmaz Figen, Çelik Mustafa, Kuran Banu
The Balıklı Greek Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ministry of Health, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, İstanbul, Turkey.
Acta Med Litu. 2024;31(2):302-314. doi: 10.15388/Amed.2024.31.2.19. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
The objective of this study is to assess the clinical and electrophysiological effectiveness of electrical stimulation in patients diagnosed Bell's palsy (BP), and to examine its impact on potential complications that may arise during the course of the illness.
Thirty patients diagnosed with BP were enrolled and randomized into two treatment groups of 15 patients each. The treatment group (TG) received 15 sessions of electrical stimulation (ES), infrared, and exercise therapy, 5 days a week for 3 weeks, while the control group (CG) received sham ES, infrared, and exercise therapy. Evaluations were conducted by electromyography before treatment and at 1 and 3 months after the end of treatment for all patients.
When evaluating patients in both groups based on the side where the BP developed, electrophysiological examination showed an increase in the rate of synkinesis in both the TG and CG. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The study found that ES did not reduce the presence of synkinesis in denervated muscles. However, the nerve conduction studies of the studied branches of the facial nerve showed a decrease in distal latencies and an increase in amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials, indicating that ES has a positive effect on nerve regeneration.
ES resulted in a notable reduction in distal latency values within the treatment group. Additionally, ES was found to significantly alleviate depressive symptoms, although it did not result in an improvement in overall quality of life. Therefore, ES is considered a safe treatment method that can be used in the treatment of BP.
本研究的目的是评估电刺激对贝尔面瘫(BP)患者的临床和电生理疗效,并研究其对疾病过程中可能出现的潜在并发症的影响。
纳入30例诊断为BP的患者,随机分为两个治疗组,每组15例。治疗组(TG)接受15次电刺激(ES)、红外线和运动疗法,每周5天,共3周,而对照组(CG)接受假ES、红外线和运动疗法。对所有患者在治疗前以及治疗结束后1个月和3个月进行肌电图评估。
在根据BP发病侧对两组患者进行评估时,电生理检查显示TG和CG的联带运动发生率均有所增加。然而,两组之间无统计学显著差异。研究发现,ES并未降低失神经肌肉中联带运动的发生率。然而,面神经各研究分支的神经传导研究显示,远端潜伏期缩短,复合肌肉动作电位幅度增加,表明ES对神经再生有积极作用。
ES使治疗组的远端潜伏期值显著降低。此外,尽管ES并未改善总体生活质量,但发现其能显著减轻抑郁症状。因此,ES被认为是一种可用于治疗BP的安全治疗方法。