Suppr超能文献

使用旋转系统进行零上腔静脉损伤导线取出术:当代经验

Zero superior vena cava injury lead extraction with rotational system: A contemporary experience.

作者信息

Williams Iverson E, Sharaf Omar M, Azarrafiy Ryan, Demos Daniel, Jeng Eric I, Freeman Kirsten A, Spratt John R, Beaver Thomas M

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Fla.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2024 Nov 26;23:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.010. eCollection 2025 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction (TLE) is susceptible to superior vena cava (SVC) injury and can be performed in the operating room (OR) or electrophysiology lab via a mechanical device or laser-powered extraction. This study reflects a contemporary experience of mechanical right-left rotational extraction by cardiac surgeons in the OR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center review of adult (age ≥18 years) TLE cases performed by cardiac surgeons between 2019 and 2021. Leads were extracted via a transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system in the OR under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Procedural success was defined as complete extraction of all leads without major complications, based on the Heart Rhythm Society's 2017 guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 210 leads were extracted from 104 patients, including 72 males (69%). The mean patient age was 63.8 ± 16.7 years, and 26 patients (25%) had undergone prior sternotomy. The most common indication for CIED extraction was infection (69%; n = 72). Removed CIEDs included single-chamber defibrillators (46%; n = 48), pacemakers (33%; n = 34), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (21%; n = 22). The mean age of the oldest extracted lead by patient was 9.79 ± 7.25 years. Procedural success was obtained in 95% of cases (99/104). The remaining cases included distal lead fracture (n = 3), inferior vena cava laceration necessitating sternotomy (n = 1), and tricuspid valve damage requiring delayed valve replacement (n = 1). There were zero SVC injuries, and procedure-related mortality was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical, controlled-rotation TLE is effective and can be performed safely without SVC injury. TLE by cardiac surgeons in the OR enables rapid conversion to sternotomy in the event of major complications.

摘要

背景

经静脉心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)导线拔除术(TLE)易导致上腔静脉(SVC)损伤,可在手术室(OR)或电生理实验室通过机械设备或激光动力拔除术进行。本研究反映了心脏外科医生在手术室进行机械左右旋转拔除术的当代经验。

方法

我们对2019年至2021年间心脏外科医生进行的成人(年龄≥18岁)TLE病例进行了回顾性单中心研究。在全身麻醉和经食管超声心动图引导下,在手术室通过经静脉机械左右控制旋转系统拔除导线。根据心律协会2017年指南,手术成功定义为所有导线完全拔除且无重大并发症。

结果

共从104例患者中拔除210根导线,其中男性72例(69%)。患者平均年龄为63.8±16.7岁,26例(25%)曾接受过胸骨切开术。CIED拔除最常见的指征是感染(69%;n = 72)。取出的CIED包括单腔除颤器(46%;n = 48)、起搏器(33%;n = 34)和心脏再同步治疗设备(21%;n = 22)。患者拔除的最旧导线的平均年龄为9.79±7.25岁。95%的病例(99/104)手术成功。其余病例包括远端导线断裂(n = 3)、因下腔静脉撕裂需行胸骨切开术(n = 1)以及三尖瓣损伤需延迟瓣膜置换(n = 1)。无SVC损伤,与手术相关的死亡率为0%。

结论

机械控制旋转TLE有效,可安全进行且无SVC损伤。心脏外科医生在手术室进行TLE,在发生重大并发症时能够迅速转为胸骨切开术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a82/11883677/c70edecc7c6f/fx1.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Strategies for Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures.经静脉导线拔除术的策略
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 May 15;8(5):2702-2716. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080502. eCollection 2017 May.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验