新型自动冲洗装置与带侧孔针头冲洗对无髓牙细菌菌落形成单位计数的比较评估
Comparative Evaluation of Novel Automated Irrigation Devices with Side-Vented Needle Irrigation on Bacterial CFU Counts in Nonvital Teeth.
作者信息
Teja Kavalipurapu Venkata, Ramesh Sindhu, Srivastava Kumar Chandan, Ehsan Aliya, Choudhari Sahil, Shrivastava Deepti
机构信息
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mamata Institute of Dental Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
出版信息
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4811-S4815. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1206_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
BACKGROUND
Syringe needle irrigation is used frequently to deliver root canal disinfectants. However, conventional syringe needle irrigation has its potential drawbacks. The current study, hence, aimed at assessing the real-time benefit of using conventional needle irrigation as compared to a novel automated irrigation device in patients undergoing root canal treatment.
METHODS
It is a prospective study where 45 patients with single-rooted teeth were allocated into three groups according to the respective test disinfection technique used for disinfection: group I: novel automated irrigation device, group II: open-ended flat needle irrigation, and group III: side-vented needle irrigation. Pre- and postoperative culture samples were obtained and transferred immediately for microbial analysis.
RESULTS
A difference was noted among the groups ( < 0.05) in the antimicrobial efficacy of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.
CONCLUSION
The novel automated irrigation device was better than syringe needle irrigation in microbial reduction.
背景
注射器针头冲洗常用于输送根管消毒剂。然而，传统的注射器针头冲洗有其潜在的缺点。因此，本研究旨在评估在接受根管治疗的患者中，与新型自动冲洗装置相比，使用传统针头冲洗的实时益处。
方法
这是一项前瞻性研究，45名单根牙患者根据各自用于消毒的测试消毒技术分为三组：第一组：新型自动冲洗装置；第二组：开放式扁平针头冲洗；第三组：侧孔针头冲洗。术前和术后采集培养样本并立即送去进行微生物分析。
结果
在需氧菌和厌氧菌的抗菌效果方面，各组之间存在差异（<0.05）。
结论
新型自动冲洗装置在减少微生物方面优于注射器针头冲洗。
Zotero 插件