根管冲洗剂的新进展：综述
Newer root canal irrigants in horizon: a review.
作者信息
Jaju Sushma, Jaju Prashant P
机构信息
Dentocare Multispeciality Dental Clinic, 20 Pratik Arcade near Dena Bank, Bytco Point Nashik Road, Nashik, Maharashtra 422101, India.
出版信息
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:851359. doi: 10.1155/2011/851359. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
Abstract
Sodium hypochloride is the most commonly used endodontic irrigant, despite limitations. None of the presently available root canal irrigants satisfy the requirements of ideal root canal irrigant. Newer root canal irrigants are studied for potential replacement of sodium hypochloride. This article reviews the potential irrigants with their advantages and limitations with their future in endodontic irrigation.
摘要
尽管存在局限性，但次氯酸钠仍是最常用的根管冲洗剂。目前现有的根管冲洗剂均不能满足理想根管冲洗剂的要求。人们正在研究新型根管冲洗剂，以期潜在地替代次氯酸钠。本文综述了这些潜在冲洗剂的优缺点及其在根管冲洗方面的前景。
相似文献
1
Newer root canal irrigants in horizon: a review.根管冲洗剂的新进展：综述
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:851359. doi: 10.1155/2011/851359. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
2
Mixture tetracycline citric acid and detergent - A root canal irrigant. A review.四环素柠檬酸与洗涤剂混合液——一种根管冲洗剂。综述
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;3(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
3
Root canal irrigants: a review of their interactions, benefits, and limitations.根管冲洗剂：对其相互作用、益处及局限性的综述
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015 Apr;36(4):256-61; quiz 262, 264.
4
Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant, Bingpeng Irrigant, and Fufang Bingpeng Irrigant as Endodontic Irrigants During Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation.评价次氯酸钠冲洗液、槟蓬冲洗液和复方槟蓬冲洗液作为被动超声冲洗时的根管冲洗剂。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 May 10;9:145. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00145. eCollection 2019.
5
Endodontic Disinfection for Orthograde Root Canal Treatment in Veterinary Dentistry.兽医牙科学中根管治疗正向根管治疗的牙髓消毒
J Vet Dent. 2020 Mar;37(1):35-40. doi: 10.1177/0898756420918700. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Irrigants for non-surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth.成熟恒牙非手术根管治疗的冲洗液
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD008948. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008948.pub2.
7
Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine as a root canal irrigant: a literature review.洗必泰作为根管冲洗剂的抗菌效果：文献综述
J Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;56(2):99-103. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.56.99.
8
A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An SEM Study.四种根管冲洗液去除玷污层效果的比较评价：扫描电镜研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 May 1;22(5):527-531.
9
Osmolarity and root canal antiseptics.渗透压与根管消毒剂
Int Endod J. 2014 Apr;47(4):314-20. doi: 10.1111/iej.12153. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
10
Root Canal Irrigation: Chemical Agents and Plant Extracts Against .根管冲洗：对抗……的化学药剂和植物提取物
Open Dent J. 2016 Dec 19;10:692-703. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010692. eCollection 2016.
引用本文的文献
1
Root canal irrigants and their role in the adhesion of pre-endodontic restorations.根管冲洗剂及其在根管治疗前修复体黏附中的作用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jun 16;29(7):340. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06421-2.
2
Selenium anion substitution in hydroxyapatite: chemo-mechanical effects compared with root canal dentin.羟基磷灰石中硒阴离子取代：与根管牙本质相比的化学机械效应
Odontology. 2025 May 11. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01111-7.
3
Enhancing Root Canal Disinfection with Er:YAG Laser: A Systematic Review.用铒激光增强根管消毒：一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;13(3):101. doi: 10.3390/dj13030101.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Novel Automated Irrigation Devices with Side-Vented Needle Irrigation on Bacterial CFU Counts in Nonvital Teeth.新型自动冲洗装置与带侧孔针头冲洗对无髓牙细菌菌落形成单位计数的比较评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4811-S4815. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1206_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate, Ozonated Water, Alum Water, and Normal Saline Solutions against Endodontopathogenic Microorganism, : A Microbiological Study.3%次氯酸钠、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定、臭氧水、明矾水和生理盐水溶液对牙髓致病性微生物抗真菌功效的比较评价：一项微生物学研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(Suppl 1):S17-S24. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2754.
6
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Etidronic Acid against in Primary Teeth: An Study.依替膦酸对乳牙的抗菌效果评估：一项体外研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(4):433-436. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2834.
7
Poly(Lysine)-Derived Carbon Quantum Dots Conquer Biofilm-Induced Persistent Endodontic Infections.聚赖氨酸衍生碳量子点攻克生物膜诱导的持续性牙髓感染
Int J Nanomedicine. 2024 Jun 13;19:5879-5893. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S453385. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring Periostracum as an Alternative Root Canal Irrigant: Insights From Zebrafish Embryo Experiments.探索骨膜作为一种替代性根管冲洗剂：来自斑马鱼胚胎实验的见解。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 21;16(3):e56638. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56638. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Apical One-Third of the Root Using Different Protocols of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser.不同protocol 的铒激光（Er:YAG）对根尖 1/3 牙本质表面玷污层去除效果的研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 22;59(3):433. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030433.
10
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite, Triphala, , and Carvacrol against : An study.次氯酸钠、三果木和香芹酚对……的抗菌效果比较评估：一项……研究 （注：原文中“Triphala, ”后面逗号多余，且“An study”表述不完整，这里只能尽量按现有内容翻译）
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):514-519. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2440.
本文引用的文献
1
An update on the antibiotic-based root canal irrigation solutions.基于抗生素的根管冲洗液的最新进展。
Iran Endod J. 2008 Spring;3(2):1-7. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
2
Nanoparticle-based endodontic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.基于纳米粒子的根管抗菌光动力疗法。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
3
Photodynamic therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplement to instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promoting intracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis.两种不同光敏剂的光动力疗法作为器械/冲洗程序的补充，以促进粪肠球菌在根管内的减少。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):292-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.041. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
4
Cavitational effects in aqueous endodontic irrigants generated by near-infrared lasers.近红外激光在水基根管冲洗液中产生的空化效应。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):275-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
5
The synergistic antimicrobial effect by mechanical agitation and two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria.机械搅拌和两种洗必泰制剂对生物膜细菌的协同抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.018.
6
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Triphala and green tea polyphenols), MTAD, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: an in vitro study.评价草药替代物（三果汤和绿茶多酚）、MTAD 和 5%次氯酸钠对牙本质上形成的粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌功效：一项体外研究。
J Endod. 2010 Jan;36(1):83-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.040.
7
The antibacterial effect of photodynamic therapy in dental plaque-derived biofilms.光动力疗法在牙菌斑生物膜中的抗菌作用。
J Periodontal Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):751-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2008.01187.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
8
A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation.三种冲洗液对根尖根管内牙本质玷污层去除及侵蚀作用的比较研究：扫描电子显微镜评价
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):900-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.052.
9
Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices.当代冲洗液搅拌技术与装置综述
J Endod. 2009 Jun;35(6):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010.
10
Light activated disinfection: an alternative endodontic disinfection strategy.光活化消毒：一种替代性的牙髓消毒策略。
Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):108-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01102.x.
Zotero 插件