• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北卡罗来纳州社区癌症伙伴关系案例:对一段成功的为期十四年的社区-参与式行动研究伙伴关系的反思

The NCCB Case Example: Reflections on a Successful Fourteen-Year CBPR Partnership.

作者信息

Jemal Alexis D, Benoit Ellen, Thompson Shola, Jones Heather A, Windsor Liliane, Lassiter Teri, Thompson Warren

机构信息

Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College.

The Briar Patch Collaboratory.

出版信息

J Particip Res Methods. 2024;5(2). doi: 10.35844/001c.120896. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.35844/001c.120896
PMID:40062353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11887649/
Abstract

The Newark Community Collaborative Board (NCCB) is in its fourteenth year of operation with nine successful research projects and more than six million dollars in funding. The NCCB began with a community needs assessment in Newark, New Jersey, that led to the subsequent establishment of a community collaborative board (CCB) of consumers, researchers, service providers, and residents committed to advocating for health equity through community engagement and research informed by critical thinking. This paper explores the NCCB's history and processes that allowed conducting community-based participatory research (CBPR) to reduce inequities related to social determinants of health (SDH). This conceptual manuscript draws on data from NCCB meeting minutes and a group interview with three of the five founding members. We detail the collaborative process used to develop and assess Community Wise, a multilevel, group-based intervention designed to reduce substance use among formerly incarcerated men in Newark, funded by the National Institutes of Health. Review of documentation and interview transcripts revealed the following key ingredients for success: 1) Having a north star; 2) Functional diversity; 3) Challenges as learning opportunities; 4) Board structure and healthy relationships; and 5) Funding and resources. The NCCB has undergone multiple transformations, including a name change to the New Jersey Critical Consciousness Collaborative Board (NJ-3CB), representing its growth from being a small local board to becoming part of a network of community collaborative boards across the United States and a chapter of the global campaign against racism. These and future transitions will help sustain the collaborative journey.

摘要

纽瓦克社区合作委员会(NCCB)已运营十四年,开展了九个成功的研究项目,获得了超过六百万美元的资金。NCCB始于对新泽西州纽瓦克市的社区需求评估,随后成立了一个由消费者、研究人员、服务提供者和居民组成的社区合作委员会(CCB),致力于通过社区参与和基于批判性思维的研究来倡导健康公平。本文探讨了NCCB的历史和流程,这些历史和流程使其能够开展基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR),以减少与健康的社会决定因素(SDH)相关的不平等现象。这篇概念性手稿借鉴了NCCB会议记录中的数据以及对五名创始成员中的三名进行的小组访谈。我们详细介绍了用于开发和评估“社区明智”(Community Wise)的合作过程,“社区明智”是一项多层次、基于群体的干预措施,旨在减少纽瓦克市曾被监禁男性的物质使用,由美国国立卫生研究院资助。对文件和访谈记录的审查揭示了成功的以下关键要素:1)有一个北极星目标;2)功能多样性;3)将挑战视为学习机会;4)董事会结构和健康的关系;5)资金和资源。NCCB经历了多次变革,包括更名为新泽西批判意识合作委员会(NJ - 3CB),这代表了它从一个小型地方委员会发展成为美国社区合作委员会网络的一部分以及全球反种族主义运动的一个分会的成长历程。这些以及未来的转变将有助于维持合作之旅。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fed/11887649/01d921d767e5/nihms-2060285-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fed/11887649/6fec50e6333e/nihms-2060285-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fed/11887649/01d921d767e5/nihms-2060285-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fed/11887649/6fec50e6333e/nihms-2060285-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fed/11887649/01d921d767e5/nihms-2060285-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The NCCB Case Example: Reflections on a Successful Fourteen-Year CBPR Partnership.北卡罗来纳州社区癌症伙伴关系案例:对一段成功的为期十四年的社区-参与式行动研究伙伴关系的反思
J Particip Res Methods. 2024;5(2). doi: 10.35844/001c.120896. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
5
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.
8
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
9
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
10
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Protection of Participants in Community-Engaged Research by Institutional Review Boards: A Call for Action.机构审查委员会对社区参与研究中参与者的保护:行动呼吁。
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(S5):S360-S365. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307592. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
2
Correlations between Educational Struggle, Toxic Sites by School District and Demographic Variables, with Geographical Information System Projections.教育斗争、学区有毒地点与人口统计学变量的相关性,以及地理信息系统预测。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 9;20(24):7160. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247160.
3
Disparities in Toxic Chemical Exposures and Associated Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Systematic Evidence Map of the Epidemiological Literature.
有毒化学物质暴露与相关神经发育结局的差异:流行病学文献的范围综述和系统证据图谱。
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Sep;131(9):96001. doi: 10.1289/EHP11750. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
4
Environmentally Mediated Health Disparities.环境介导的健康差异。
Am J Med. 2023 Jun;136(6):518-522. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
5
Environmental justice and allergic disease: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Environmental Exposure and Respiratory Health Committee and the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee.环境正义与过敏性疾病:美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学会环境暴露与呼吸健康委员会和多样性、公平和包容委员会的一份工作报告。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023 Mar;151(3):656-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.025. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
Disparities in Opioid Overdose Death Trends by Race/Ethnicity, 2018-2019, From the HEALing Communities Study.2018 - 2019年按种族/族裔划分的阿片类药物过量死亡趋势差异,来自“健康社区研究”。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Oct;111(10):1851-1854. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306431. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Enhancing behavioral intervention science: using community-based participatory research principles with the multiphase optimization strategy.增强行为干预科学:运用基于社区的参与式研究原则与多阶段最优化策略。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Aug 13;11(8):1596-1605. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab032.
8
The Effects of Two Community-Based Participatory Action Research Programs on Violence Outside of and in School Among Adolescents and Young Adults in a Latino Community.两项基于社区的参与式行动研究项目对拉丁裔社区青少年和青年在校内外暴力行为的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Feb;68(2):370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
9
Disparities in Health Care for Black Patients in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in the United States: A Narrative Review.美国物理医学与康复领域黑人患者的医疗保健差异:一项叙述性综述。
PM R. 2021 Feb;13(2):180-203. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12509. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
10
Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes.参与公平:社区参与式研究和社区参与式研究实践与成果的长期研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):380-390. doi: 10.1177/1090198119897075.