University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):380-390. doi: 10.1177/1090198119897075.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and community-engaged research have been established in the past 25 years as valued research approaches within health education, public health, and other health and social sciences for their effectiveness in reducing inequities. While early literature focused on partnering principles and processes, within the past decade, individual studies, as well as systematic reviews, have increasingly documented outcomes in community support and empowerment, sustained partnerships, healthier behaviors, policy changes, and health improvements. Despite enhanced focus on research and health outcomes, the science lags behind the practice. CBPR partnering pathways that result in outcomes remain little understood, with few studies documenting best practices. Since 2006, the University of New Mexico Center for Participatory Research with the University of Washington's Indigenous Wellness Research Institute and partners across the country has engaged in targeted investigations to fill this gap in the science. Our inquiry, spanning three stages of National Institutes of Health funding, has sought to identify which partnering practices, under which contexts and conditions, have capacity to contribute to health, research, and community outcomes. This article presents the research design of our current grant, Engage for Equity, including its history, social justice principles, theoretical bases, measures, intervention tools and resources, and preliminary findings about collective empowerment as our middle range theory of change. We end with lessons learned and recommendations for partnerships to engage in collective reflexive practice to strengthen internal power-sharing and capacity to reach health and social equity outcomes.
社区参与式研究(CBPR)和社区参与式研究在过去 25 年中已成为健康教育、公共卫生和其他健康和社会科学领域内有价值的研究方法,因为它们在减少不平等方面非常有效。尽管早期的文献主要关注合作原则和过程,但在过去十年中,个体研究以及系统评价越来越多地记录了社区支持和赋权、可持续伙伴关系、更健康的行为、政策变化和健康改善方面的结果。尽管更加关注研究和健康结果,但科学仍然落后于实践。导致结果的 CBPR 合作途径仍知之甚少,很少有研究记录最佳实践。自 2006 年以来,新墨西哥大学参与式研究中心与华盛顿大学的原住民健康研究所及其全国合作伙伴一直在进行有针对性的调查,以填补这一科学空白。我们的调查跨越了美国国立卫生研究院资助的三个阶段,旨在确定哪些合作实践在哪些背景和条件下有能力促进健康、研究和社区成果。本文介绍了我们目前的赠款项目“Engage for Equity”的研究设计,包括其历史、社会正义原则、理论基础、措施、干预工具和资源,以及关于集体赋权的初步发现,这是我们的中间范围变革理论。最后,我们总结了经验教训和建议,以促进合作伙伴关系进行集体反思实践,加强内部权力共享和实现健康和社会公平成果的能力。