O'Donnell J M
J Hist Behav Sci. 1979 Jan;15(1):3-17. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(197901)15:1<3::aid-jhbs2300150102>3.0.co;2-l.
The name Lightner Witmer is rarely invoked in the historian's litany of psychological saints. Neither a grand systematizer nor an ardent experimentalist, the "world's first clinical psychologist" is even dismissed by contemporary clinicians because of his purported failure to achieve for psychologists professional hegemony over the "problem child." Yet disciplinary ventures which in Joseph Ben-David's phrase fail to "take off" represent extremely illuminating indicators of a discipline's shifting ideas, roles, and aspirations. Explicitly urging that historians pay more attention to subgroups of larger disciplines, this paper constitutes an attempt to assess the impact of changing social roles upon psychologists' intellectual stances through an examination of Witmer's novel activities at the University of Pennsylvania.
在历史学家列举的心理学圣徒名单中,莱特纳·威特默的名字很少被提及。这位“世界上第一位临床心理学家”既不是伟大的体系构建者,也不是狂热的实验主义者,甚至因为据称未能为心理学家在“问题儿童”领域赢得专业主导地位而被当代临床医生忽视。然而,用约瑟夫·本-戴维的话说,那些未能“起飞”的学科尝试却是该学科思想、角色和抱负转变的极具启发性的指标。本文明确敦促历史学家更多地关注大型学科的子群体,试图通过考察威特默在宾夕法尼亚大学的创新活动,评估社会角色变化对心理学家知识立场的影响。