Suppr超能文献

评估退伍军人对肾去神经支配治疗难治性高血压的偏好:一项单中心调查研究。

Evaluating Veterans' Preferences for Renal Denervation for Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: A Single-Center Survey Study.

作者信息

Magod Benjamin L, Glynn Peter A, Manz Wesley J, Shah Pal V, Vidovich Mladen I

机构信息

Department of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.

Division of Cardiology University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 10;8(3):e70549. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70549. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective alternative treatment for hypertension. However, data on patient preferences are limited. This study sought to delineate preferences for RDN among Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center with the goal of optimizing management and referral practices in hypertensive Veterans.

METHODS

Patients on 3+ antihypertensive medications and a measured creatinine < 2.5 mg/dL were identified from the pharmacy database. A total of 100 randomly selected patients were telephoned for the administration of a survey assessing patient preferences for RDN, expectations for RDN, as well as medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Additional chart review was performed to gather demographic and clinical data of survey respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 51 Veterans completed the survey. While 29 (56.9%) Veterans indicated a preference against RDN, 22 (43.1%) indicated a preference for this procedure, and 33 (64.7%) expressed that if their blood pressure were uncontrolled, they would prefer RDN over additional medication. A history of congestive heart failure ( = 0.017) and lower MARS-5 score ( = 0.007) were associated with a preference for RDN. Age, reported medication side effects, and hypertension treatment satisfaction ratings were not associated with preference for or against RDN.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable portion of Veterans with difficult-to-control hypertension at an urban VA Medical Center expressed a preference for RDN if their blood pressure were to be uncontrolled or if recommended by their doctor. These survey results should be considered in shared decision-making discussions for hypertension management in this population.

摘要

背景与目的

基于导管的肾去神经支配术(RDN)是一种安全有效的高血压替代治疗方法。然而,关于患者偏好的数据有限。本研究旨在明确城市退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心难以控制高血压的退伍军人对RDN的偏好,以优化高血压退伍军人的管理和转诊实践。

方法

从药房数据库中识别出服用3种及以上抗高血压药物且测量的肌酐<2.5mg/dL的患者。总共随机选择100名患者进行电话调查,评估患者对RDN的偏好、对RDN的期望以及使用药物依从性报告量表(MARS-5)的药物依从性。进行额外的病历审查以收集调查受访者的人口统计学和临床数据。

结果

共有51名退伍军人完成了调查。虽然29名(56.9%)退伍军人表示不倾向于RDN,但22名(43.1%)表示倾向于该手术,33名(64.7%)表示如果他们的血压未得到控制,他们更倾向于RDN而非额外用药。充血性心力衰竭病史(P = 0.017)和较低的MARS-5评分(P = 0.007)与倾向于RDN相关。年龄、报告的药物副作用和高血压治疗满意度评分与倾向于或不倾向于RDN无关。

结论

城市VA医疗中心相当一部分难以控制高血压的退伍军人表示,如果他们的血压未得到控制或医生推荐,他们倾向于RDN。在该人群高血压管理的共同决策讨论中应考虑这些调查结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b13/11892023/f0a668b5e525/HSR2-8-e70549-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验