Mosleh Berta, Schwarz Stefan, Cho Anna, Sinn Katharina, Steindl Ariane, Zöchbauer-Müller Sabine, Köstler Wolfgang J, Dieckmann Karin, Heilmann Martin, Widder Joachim, Gompelmann Daniela, Aigner Clemens, Klikovits Thomas, Hoda Mir Alireza
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Mar;16(5):e70024. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70024.
Few malignancies provoke as many controversies about treatment as pleural mesothelioma. There is limited experience with novel radiotherapy techniques worldwide in adjuvant and particularly in neoadjuvant settings within multimodality treatment. The objective of the current study was to investigate the long-term outcome of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pleural intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with macroscopic complete resection with or without chemotherapy.
We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 59 patients who were diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma and underwent multimodality treatment including macroscopic complete resection and neoadjuvant or adjuvant IMRT between 2005 and 2019 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
In total, 59 patients (median age 59 years; IQR 54-66, male, n = 48; 81%) were included. Forty-seven patients underwent trimodality treatment consisting of induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and adjuvant IMRT. Novel neoadjuvant IMRT with (n = 9) or without (n = 3) chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed in 12 patients. Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 23.2 months (95% CI; 18.1-28.2) and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 33% and 28%, respectively. Survival was comparable between therapies including neoadjuvant versus adjuvant IMRT (median OS 17.5 vs. 24.0 months, p = 0.39).
Neoadjuvant pleural IMRT has been investigated as a novel treatment option for highly selected cases in pleural mesothelioma. Neoadjuvant IMRT was effective and safe in patients treated in a high-volume institution but showed no relevant survival benefit compared to adjuvant IMRT within multimodality treatment.
很少有恶性肿瘤在治疗方面引发像胸膜间皮瘤这么多的争议。在全球范围内,新型放射治疗技术在多模式治疗的辅助治疗中,尤其是新辅助治疗中的应用经验有限。本研究的目的是探讨新辅助和辅助胸膜调强放射治疗(IMRT)联合肉眼可见的完全切除,联合或不联合化疗的长期疗效。
我们回顾性分析了2005年至2019年间在奥地利维也纳医科大学胸外科连续收治的59例诊断为胸膜间皮瘤并接受多模式治疗(包括肉眼可见的完全切除和新辅助或辅助IMRT)的患者队列。
共纳入59例患者(中位年龄59岁;四分位间距54 - 66岁,男性48例;81%)。47例患者接受了三联治疗,包括诱导化疗、胸膜外全肺切除术和辅助IMRT。12例患者接受了新辅助IMRT联合(n = 9)或不联合(n = 3)化疗,随后进行胸膜外全肺切除术。所有患者的中位总生存期(OS)为23.2个月(95%置信区间;18.1 - 28.2),3年和5年生存率分别为33%和28%。新辅助IMRT与辅助IMRT治疗的患者生存率相当(中位OS 17.5 vs. 24.0个月,p = 0.39)。
新辅助胸膜IMRT已被研究作为胸膜间皮瘤高度选择病例的一种新型治疗选择。新辅助IMRT在大容量机构治疗的患者中是有效且安全的,但与多模式治疗中的辅助IMRT相比,未显示出相关的生存获益。