• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥散加权成像(DWI)阴性对采用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)2.1版评估前列腺病变的诊断影响

Diagnostic impact of DWI absence on prostate lesion assessment using PI-RADS 2.1.

作者信息

Firoozeh Negar, Park Sung Yoon, Nyame Yaw, Mahdavi Arash, Nabipoorashrafi Seyed Ali, Mileto Achille, Mansoori Bahar, Westphalen Antonio C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Departments of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2025 Sep-Oct;54(5):596-602. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.03.001. Epub 2025 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.03.001
PMID:40069017
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores derived from a standard multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) protocol with those from a protocol consisting only of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced images (T2+DCE MRI).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study approved by the IRB and compliant with HIPAA, 492 MRI exams performed in 2022 were analyzed. PI-RADS scores from mpMRIs were extracted from medical records, and new scores were generated for T2+DCE MRI following PI-RADS guidelines. Score differences were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar's tests, stratified by lesion location (peripheral zone, PZ, and transition zone, TZ). Diagnostic accuracies of the two methods were compared using ROC curves, and logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of score changes.

RESULTS

Notable differences in PI-RADS scores were observed were observed in the PZ (P = 0.03) and TZ (P < 0.001). 4.8 % of PZ and 4.0 % of TZ PI-RADS 3-5 lesions were misclassified as PI-RADS 1-2 on T2W+DCE MRI (PZ vs TZ, P = 0.64). However, ROC curve analyses revealed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between mpMRI (Az = 0.77) and T2+DCE MRI (Az = 0.75, P = 0.07). PSA density was identified as a predictor of score changes from PI-RADS 3-5 to 1-2, although the effect size was modest.

CONCLUSIONS

Although T2+DCE MRI yields different PI-RADS scores compared to mpMRI, the clinical impact on diagnostic accuracy and decision-making is overall small. This supports the continued use of T2+DCE MRI, particularly when diffusion-weighted imaging is compromised.

摘要

目的

比较源自标准多参数前列腺MRI(mpMRI)方案的前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与仅由T2加权和动态对比增强图像组成的方案(T2+DCE MRI)的评分。

方法

在这项经机构审查委员会批准并符合健康保险流通与责任法案的回顾性、单中心横断面研究中,分析了2022年进行的492例MRI检查。从病历中提取mpMRI的PI-RADS评分,并根据PI-RADS指南为T2+DCE MRI生成新的评分。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和McNemar检验评估评分差异,按病变位置(外周带,PZ,和移行带,TZ)分层。使用ROC曲线比较两种方法的诊断准确性,并采用逻辑回归来确定评分变化的预测因素。

结果

在PZ(P = 0.03)和TZ(P < 0.001)中观察到PI-RADS评分存在显著差异。在T2W+DCE MRI上,4.8%的PZ和4.0%的TZ的PI-RADS 3-5级病变被误分类为PI-RADS 1-2级(PZ与TZ,P = 0.64)。然而,ROC曲线分析显示mpMRI(Az = 0.77)和T2+DCE MRI(Az = 0.75,P = 0.07)之间的诊断准确性没有显著差异。PSA密度被确定为从PI-RADS 3-5级变为1-2级评分变化的预测因素,尽管效应大小适中。

结论

尽管与mpMRI相比,T2+DCE MRI产生不同的PI-RADS评分,但对诊断准确性和决策的临床影响总体较小。这支持继续使用T2+DCE MRI,特别是在扩散加权成像受损时。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic impact of DWI absence on prostate lesion assessment using PI-RADS 2.1.弥散加权成像(DWI)阴性对采用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)2.1版评估前列腺病变的诊断影响
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2025 Sep-Oct;54(5):596-602. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2025.03.001. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
2
The Role of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Partially-Blinded Retrospective Study of a Prostatectomy Patient Cohort With Whole Gland Histopathology Correlation and Application of PI-RADS or TNM Staging.动态对比增强磁共振成像在评估前列腺腺癌中的作用:一项对前列腺切除患者队列进行的部分盲法回顾性研究,该研究将全腺体组织病理学相关性与PI-RADS或TNM分期的应用相结合。
Prostate. 2025 Apr;85(5):413-423. doi: 10.1002/pros.24843. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
3
Prospective evaluation of mpMRI-derived nomograms for detecting prostate cancer in PI-RADS v2.1 upgraded and non-upgraded lesions.基于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的列线图对PI-RADS v2.1升级和未升级病变中前列腺癌检测的前瞻性评估
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 4;15:1510049. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1510049. eCollection 2025.
4
Prospective Validation of an Automated Hybrid Multidimensional MRI Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Targeted Biopsy: Comparison with PI-RADS-based Assessment.使用靶向活检对用于前列腺癌检测的自动化混合多维MRI工具进行前瞻性验证:与基于PI-RADS的评估方法的比较
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240156. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240156.
5
Evaluating Biparametric Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An International, Paired, Noninferiority, Confirmatory Observer Study.评估双参数与多参数磁共振成像在诊断具有临床意义的前列腺癌中的应用:一项国际、配对、非劣效性、验证性观察者研究。
Eur Urol. 2025 Feb;87(2):240-250. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.035. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
6
Transition zone-based prostate-specific antigen density for differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS score 3 lesions.基于移行带的前列腺特异性抗原密度用于鉴别PI-RADS 3分病变中具有临床意义的前列腺癌
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):3258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87311-1.
7
The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.磁共振波谱和增强磁共振成像技术在辅助前列腺异常活检定位中的诊断准确性和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17200.
8
Predicting uninformative prostate magnetic resonance imaging sequences: a hypothesis-generating pilot study.预测无信息价值的前列腺磁共振成像序列:一项产生假设的初步研究。
Radiol Bras. 2025 Jul 17;58:e20250007. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2025.0007. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
PI-QUAL version 2 image quality categorisation and inter-reader agreement compared to version 1.与第1版相比,PI-QUAL第2版的图像质量分类及阅片者间一致性
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3096-3104. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11233-1. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
10
AI-Assisted vs Unassisted Identification of Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Images.磁共振图像中人工智能辅助与非辅助前列腺癌识别
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15672.