• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义嵌入揭示并解决了心理测量中的分类不可通约性问题。

Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement.

作者信息

Wulff Dirk U, Mata Rui

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Center for Cognitive & Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02089-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-024-02089-y
PMID:40069366
Abstract

Taxonomic incommensurability denotes the difficulty in comparing scientific theories due to different uses of concepts and operationalizations. To tackle this problem in psychology, here we use language models to obtain semantic embeddings representing psychometric items, scales and construct labels in a vector space. This approach allows us to analyse different datasets (for example, the International Personality Item Pool) spanning thousands of items and hundreds of scales and constructs and show that embeddings can be used to predict empirical relations between measures, automatically detect taxonomic fallacies and suggest more parsimonious taxonomies. These findings suggest that semantic embeddings constitute a powerful tool for tackling taxonomic incommensurability in the psychological sciences.

摘要

分类不可通约性指的是由于概念和操作化的不同使用而导致比较科学理论存在困难。为了解决心理学中的这一问题,我们在此使用语言模型来获取语义嵌入,这些嵌入在向量空间中表示心理测量项目、量表和构念标签。这种方法使我们能够分析跨越数千个项目以及数百个量表和构念的不同数据集(例如国际个性项目池),并表明嵌入可用于预测测量之间的实证关系、自动检测分类谬误以及提出更简洁的分类法。这些发现表明,语义嵌入是解决心理科学中分类不可通约性的有力工具。

相似文献

1
Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement.语义嵌入揭示并解决了心理测量中的分类不可通约性问题。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02089-y.
2
The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies.语义量表网络:一种在线工具,用于检测心理量表的语义重叠,防止量表冗余。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):380-392. doi: 10.1037/met0000244. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Evaluating semantic relations in neural word embeddings with biomedical and general domain knowledge bases.利用生物医学和一般领域知识库评估神经词汇嵌入中的语义关系。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jul 23;18(Suppl 2):65. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0630-x.
4
The primacy of taxonomic semantic organization over thematic semantic organization during picture naming.在图片命名过程中,分类语义组织优先于主题语义组织。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105951. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105951. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
5
Semantic search helper: A tool based on the use of embeddings in multi-item questionnaires as a harmonization opportunity for merging large datasets - A feasibility study.语义搜索助手:一种基于在多项目问卷中使用嵌入作为合并大型数据集的协调机会的工具——一项可行性研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 20;68(1):e8. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1808.
6
Use of word and graph embedding to measure semantic relatedness between Unified Medical Language System concepts.使用词和图嵌入来衡量统一医学语言系统概念之间的语义相关性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Oct 1;27(10):1538-1546. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa136.
7
A deep learning approach to personality assessment: Generalizing across items and expanding the reach of survey-based research.一种基于深度学习的人格评估方法:跨项目泛化和扩大基于调查研究的范围。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):312-331. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000480. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
8
Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE): A hybrid multi-ontology and corpus-based semantic representation model for biomedical concepts.多本体精炼嵌入模型(MORE):一种基于混合多本体和语料库的生物医学概念语义表示模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Nov;111:103581. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103581. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Qualitative and quantitative analyses of psychological distress: methodological complementarity and ontological incommensurability.
Qual Health Res. 2000 May;10(3):411-23. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118426.
10
Distinct fronto-temporal substrates of distributional and taxonomic similarity among words: evidence from RSA of BOLD signals.词的分布相似性和分类相似性的额颞叶不同基础:基于 BOLD 信号的 RSA 证据。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117408. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117408. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Expertise and Large Language Model Embeddings in the Content Validity Assessment of Personality Tests.人格测试内容效度评估中的人类专业知识与大语言模型嵌入
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Aug 14:00131644251355485. doi: 10.1177/00131644251355485.
2
Statistics is not measurement: The inbuilt semantics of psychometric scales and language-based models obscures crucial epistemic differences.统计学并非测量:心理测量量表和基于语言的模型的内在语义掩盖了关键的认知差异。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1534270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534270. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A tutorial on open-source large language models for behavioral science.行为科学开源大语言模型教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8214-8237. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02455-8. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
A deep learning approach to personality assessment: Generalizing across items and expanding the reach of survey-based research.一种基于深度学习的人格评估方法:跨项目泛化和扩大基于调查研究的范围。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):312-331. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000480. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Deep lexical hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural language.
深度词汇假说:在自然语言中识别人格结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;125(1):173-197. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000443. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
4
Concept Creep and Psychiatrization.概念蠕变与精神疾病化
Front Sociol. 2021 Dec 16;6:806147. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.806147. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessing the Structure of the Five Factor Model of Personality (IPIP-NEO-120) in the Public Domain.评估公共领域中人格五因素模型(IPIP-NEO-120)的结构。
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Jun 7;15(2):260-275. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1671. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?为什么自陈式测量和行为测量相关性较弱?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):267-269. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
7
The Semantic Scale Network: An online tool to detect semantic overlap of psychological scales and prevent scale redundancies.语义量表网络:一种在线工具,用于检测心理量表的语义重叠,防止量表冗余。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Jun;25(3):380-392. doi: 10.1037/met0000244. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
8
A scoping review of ontologies related to human behaviour change.针对人类行为改变相关本体论的范围综述。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):164-172. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0511-4. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
The jingle-jangle of work-nonwork balance: A comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement.工作与非工作平衡的叮当声:其意义和测量的综合和元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Feb;103(2):182-214. doi: 10.1037/apl0000259. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
10
The jingle and jangle of emotion assessment: Imprecise measurement, casual scale usage, and conceptual fuzziness in emotion research.情感评估的混乱与模糊:情感研究中测量不精确、量表使用随意及概念模糊
Emotion. 2017 Mar;17(2):267-295. doi: 10.1037/emo0000226. Epub 2016 Sep 19.