• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于深度学习的人格评估方法:跨项目泛化和扩大基于调查研究的范围。

A deep learning approach to personality assessment: Generalizing across items and expanding the reach of survey-based research.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.

Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):312-331. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000480. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000480
PMID:37676124
Abstract

Traditional methods of personality assessment, and survey-based research in general, cannot make inferences about new items that have not been surveyed previously. This limits the amount of information that can be obtained from a given survey. In this article, we tackle this problem by leveraging recent advances in statistical natural language processing. Specifically, we extract "embedding" representations of questionnaire items from deep neural networks, trained on large-scale English language data. These embeddings allow us to construct a high-dimensional space of items, in which linguistically similar items are located near each other. We combine item embeddings with machine learning algorithms to extrapolate participant ratings of personality items to completely new items that have not been rated by any participants. The accuracy of our approach is on par with incentivized human judges given an identical task, indicating that it predicts ratings of new personality items as accurately as people do. Our approach is also capable of identifying psychological constructs associated with questionnaire items and can accurately cluster items into their constructs based only on their language content. Overall, our results show how representations of linguistic personality descriptors obtained from deep language models can be used to model and predict a large variety of traits, scales, and constructs. In doing so, they showcase a new scalable and cost-effective method for psychological measurement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

传统的人格评估方法和一般的基于调查的研究都无法对以前未调查过的新项目进行推断。这限制了从给定调查中获得的信息量。在本文中,我们利用统计自然语言处理的最新进展来解决这个问题。具体来说,我们从基于大规模英语数据训练的深度神经网络中提取问卷项目的“嵌入”表示。这些嵌入允许我们构建一个项目的高维空间,其中语言相似的项目彼此靠近。我们将项目嵌入与机器学习算法相结合,将参与者对人格项目的评分外推到完全没有任何参与者评分的新项目上。我们的方法的准确性与给定相同任务的激励人类评委相当,这表明它可以像人一样准确地预测新人格项目的评分。我们的方法还能够识别与问卷项目相关的心理结构,并仅根据其语言内容准确地将项目聚类到其结构中。总的来说,我们的结果表明,从深度语言模型中获得的语言人格描述符的表示可以用于对各种特征、量表和结构进行建模和预测。通过这样做,他们展示了一种新的可扩展且具有成本效益的心理测量方法。

相似文献

1
A deep learning approach to personality assessment: Generalizing across items and expanding the reach of survey-based research.一种基于深度学习的人格评估方法:跨项目泛化和扩大基于调查研究的范围。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):312-331. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000480. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
Deep lexical hypothesis: Identifying personality structure in natural language.深度词汇假说:在自然语言中识别人格结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;125(1):173-197. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000443. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Affect, behavior, and cognition in personality and functioning: An item-content approach to clarifying empirical overlap.人格与功能中的情感、行为和认知:澄清经验重叠的项目内容方法。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jul;31(7):905-912. doi: 10.1037/pas0000712. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Let the algorithm speak: How to use neural networks for automatic item generation in psychological scale development.让算法说话:如何在心理量表开发中使用神经网络进行自动项目生成。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Jun;29(3):494-518. doi: 10.1037/met0000540. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Transformer-Based Deep Neural Language Modeling for Construct-Specific Automatic Item Generation.基于 Transformer 的深度神经语言模型在特定结构自动项目生成中的应用。
Psychometrika. 2022 Jun;87(2):749-772. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09823-9. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
8
Measurement specificity with modern methods: Using dimensions, facets, and items from personality assessments to predict performance.使用现代方法测量特异性:使用人格评估的维度、方面和项目来预测绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Aug;107(8):1428-1439. doi: 10.1037/apl0000618. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
9
Construction of item-level scales from the Personality Assessment Inventory to assess levels of personality functioning.从人格评估问卷中构建项目级量表,以评估人格功能水平。
Personal Disord. 2023 Nov;14(6):603-612. doi: 10.1037/per0000628. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11: A facet-level assessment of the ICD-11 trait model.《ICD-11 五因素人格量表》:对 ICD-11 特质模型的层面评估。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):60-71. doi: 10.1037/pas0000763. Epub 2019 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Expertise and Large Language Model Embeddings in the Content Validity Assessment of Personality Tests.人格测试内容效度评估中的人类专业知识与大语言模型嵌入
Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Aug 14:00131644251355485. doi: 10.1177/00131644251355485.
2
Text speaks louder: Insights into personality from natural language processing.行动胜于言语:通过自然语言处理洞察个性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0323096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323096. eCollection 2025.
3
Semantic embeddings reveal and address taxonomic incommensurability in psychological measurement.
语义嵌入揭示并解决了心理测量中的分类不可通约性问题。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02089-y.
4
A tutorial on open-source large language models for behavioral science.行为科学开源大语言模型教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8214-8237. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02455-8. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
5
Measuring the menu, not the food: "psychometric" data may instead measure "lingometrics" (and miss its greatest potential).衡量的是菜单,而非食物:“心理测量”数据或许反而衡量的是“语言测量”(并错失其最大潜力)。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 21;15:1308098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308098. eCollection 2024.