Garcia-Alcaraz Estela, Liceras Juana M
Department of Spanish, Modern, and Classical Languages, University of the Balearic Islands/Universitat de les Illes Balears, Ramon Llull, Ground floor (office AB09), Cra. de Valldemossa, km 7.5, Palma (Illes Balears), C.P. 07122, Spain.
Faculty of Arts, Department of Modern Languages and Literatures & Department of Linguistics, University of Ottawa and Nebrija University, University of Ottawa, Room #217, 70 Laurier East, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 Mar 12;54(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10123-3.
Unlike with the typically developing population, non-typically developing individuals, especially those with intellectual disabilities, have usually been recommended to learn and use only one language, despite perhaps coming from bilingual families or living in multilingual environments. This common practice, however, is not backed by empirical evidence; previous research, although limited, has systematically shown that bilingualism does not have negative effects. This study investigates how bilingualism shapes the executive control abilities of individuals with genetic disorders. Specifically, we compare the interference suppression abilities of Spanish-Catalan bilinguals and Spanish monolinguals with Prader-Willi syndrome. Fifteen participants with Prader-Willi syndrome were recruited in Spain. The bilingual group consisted of seven Spanish-Catalan bilinguals from Catalonia-an officially bilingual territory of Spain-, while the monolingual group was formed by eight Spanish speaking individuals from Madrid-an officially monolingual territory. Participants were administered two widely used psychological tasks: the Flanker Task (a non-language-based task) and the Stroop Task (a language-based task). Three experimental conditions were included in each task: neutral, congruent, and incongruent. Both accuracy and reaction time data were collected and analyzed. The results obtained are consistent between both tasks in showing (i) no detrimental effects of bilingualism; (ii) a high answer accuracy rate; (iii) a practice effect (the more familiar participants became with the tasks the faster their answers became); (iv) sensitivity to an interference effect (higher reaction times for incongruent trials than neutral trials) but not to a clear facilitation effect (lower reaction times for congruent trials than neutral trials). These results, far from being anecdotal, are in line with results from previous research investigating the effects of bilingualism among typically developing individuals as well as non-typically developing individuals with and without genetic disorders. This study not only evidences that Prader-Willi individuals can become bilingual if they are exposed to more than one language, but also that they can do so without showing negative effects at the cognitive level. In fact, taking into account the trend in the descriptive data, if an effect of bilingualism were in place, it would be a positive one. Bilingualism has repetitively been proven to neither be a burden nor to have negative effects for the typically or the non-typically developing population. Thus, as previous researchers have pointed out, there seems to be a clear incongruity between what the research is showing and the actual advice that these individuals and their families are receiving, and this should be amended without further delay.
与发育正常的人群不同,发育异常的个体,尤其是那些有智力障碍的个体,尽管他们可能来自双语家庭或生活在多语言环境中,但通常被建议只学习和使用一种语言。然而,这种常见做法并没有得到实证证据的支持;先前的研究虽然有限,但已系统地表明双语并没有负面影响。本研究调查双语如何塑造患有遗传疾病个体的执行控制能力。具体而言,我们比较了患有普拉德-威利综合征的西班牙语-加泰罗尼亚语双语者和西班牙语单语者的干扰抑制能力。在西班牙招募了15名患有普拉德-威利综合征的参与者。双语组由7名来自加泰罗尼亚(西班牙的一个官方双语地区)的西班牙语-加泰罗尼亚语双语者组成,而单语组由8名来自马德里(一个官方单语地区)的讲西班牙语的个体组成。参与者接受了两项广泛使用的心理任务:侧翼任务(一项非语言任务)和斯特鲁普任务(一项语言任务)。每个任务包括三种实验条件:中性、一致和不一致。收集并分析了准确性和反应时间数据。两项任务获得的结果一致表明:(i)双语没有负面影响;(ii)答案准确率高;(iii)练习效应(参与者对任务越熟悉,回答就越快);(iv)对干扰效应敏感(不一致试验的反应时间比中性试验长),但对明显的促进效应不敏感(一致试验的反应时间比中性试验短)。这些结果绝非偶然,与先前研究调查双语对发育正常个体以及患有和未患有遗传疾病的发育异常个体的影响的结果一致。本研究不仅证明患有普拉德-威利综合征的个体如果接触多种语言可以成为双语者,而且他们这样做在认知层面不会产生负面影响。事实上,考虑到描述性数据的趋势,如果存在双语效应,那将是积极的。双语已反复被证明对发育正常或异常的人群既不是负担也没有负面影响。因此,正如先前的研究人员所指出的,研究结果与这些个体及其家庭实际收到的建议之间似乎存在明显的不一致,应立即予以纠正。