Suppr超能文献

执行功能的个体差异研究:对双语优势假说的启示

Research on Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Implications for the Bilingual Advantage Hypothesis.

作者信息

Friedman Naomi P

机构信息

University of Colorado at Boulder.

出版信息

Linguist Approaches Biling. 2016;6(5):535-548. doi: 10.1075/lab.15041.fri. Epub 2016 May 10.

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs), such as response inhibition, interference control, and set shifting, are general-purpose control mechanisms that enable individuals to regulate their thoughts and behaviors. Because bilingual individuals use EF-like processes during language control, researchers have become interested in the hypothesis that this use might train EFs, resulting in better performance on non-linguistic EF tasks. Although this bilingual advantage hypothesis seems straightforward to test, it involves a number of important decisions in terms of how to assess bilingualism and EFs. In this article, I focus on the complexity of measuring EFs, drawing on individual differences research (conducted with participants not selected for bilingualism). Specifically, I discuss issues related to (1) the measurement of EFs (particularly the effects of task impurity and unreliability) and (2) the multicomponent nature of EFs. Within each of these topics, I elaborate on consequences for research on bilingual advantages and provide some recommendations.

摘要

执行功能(EFs),如反应抑制、干扰控制和任务转换,是一些通用的控制机制,使个体能够调节自己的思维和行为。由于双语者在语言控制过程中会使用类似执行功能的过程,研究人员开始关注这样一种假设,即这种使用可能会训练执行功能,从而在非语言执行功能任务上表现得更好。尽管这种双语优势假设似乎很容易检验,但在如何评估双语能力和执行功能方面涉及许多重要决策。在本文中,我借鉴个体差异研究(针对未因双语能力而被挑选的参与者进行),重点探讨测量执行功能的复杂性。具体来说,我将讨论与以下两个方面相关的问题:(1)执行功能的测量(特别是任务不纯和不可靠性的影响)以及(2)执行功能的多成分性质。在每个主题中,我都会详细阐述对双语优势研究的影响并提供一些建议。

相似文献

1
Research on Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Implications for the Bilingual Advantage Hypothesis.
Linguist Approaches Biling. 2016;6(5):535-548. doi: 10.1075/lab.15041.fri. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Executive functions in mono- and bilingual children: Factor structure and relations with fluid intelligence.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Dec;224:105515. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105515. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
The joint effect of bilingualism and ADHD on executive functions.
J Atten Disord. 2015 Jun;19(6):527-41. doi: 10.1177/1087054714527790. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
6
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
7
Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis.
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104373. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104373. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Do Bilingual Children Have an Executive Function Advantage? Results From Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating Tasks.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jul 5;49(3):356-378. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0107.
10
Does bilingualism increase brain or cognitive reserve in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy?
Epilepsia. 2018 May;59(5):1037-1047. doi: 10.1111/epi.14072. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

2
The Effects of Bilingualism on the Executive Control Abilities of the Prader-Willi Syndrome Population.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2025 Mar 12;54(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10123-3.
3
Clear Theories Are Needed to Interpret Differences: Perspectives on the Bilingual Advantage Debate.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Nov 11;2(4):433-451. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00038. eCollection 2021.
5
Home Language Environment and Executive Functions in Mexican American and Chinese American Preschoolers in Head Start.
Early Educ Dev. 2022;33(4):608-633. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2021.1912548. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
The developmental trajectories of executive function from adolescence to old age.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80866-1.
7
Emotion regulation strategies predict weight loss during an inpatient obesity treatment for adolescents.
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Feb 12;6(3):293-299. doi: 10.1002/osp4.410. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Executive Functions and Language: Their Differential Influence on Mono- vs. Multilingual Spelling in Primary School.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:97. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00097. eCollection 2019.
9
Do Bilingual Children Have an Executive Function Advantage? Results From Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating Tasks.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jul 5;49(3):356-378. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0107.

本文引用的文献

1
No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Feb;145(2):246-258. doi: 10.1037/xge0000120.
3
Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: an example of publication bias?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0956797614557866. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
The practice of going helps children to stop: the importance of context monitoring in inhibitory control.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):959-65. doi: 10.1037/a0035868. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
7
Understanding the Consequences of Bilingualism for Language Processing and Cognition.
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2013;25(5). doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.799170.
8
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing.
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Mar;66(2):232-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Executive functions.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验