Ayuen Dhol S, Olupot-Olupot Peter, Muhindo Rita, Onyamboko Marie A, Ajayi Seun, Chimjinda Natenapa, Taya Chiraporn, Uyoga Sophie, Williams Thomas N, Maitland Kathryn, Fanello Caterina, Day Nicholas P J, Taylor Walter R, Mukaka Mavuto
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mbale Clinical Research Institute (MCRI), P.O. Box 1966, Mbale, Uganda.
Malar J. 2025 Mar 11;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05318-5.
Anaemia is a deleterious consequence of malaria, and its accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective management. However, laboratory methods for measuring haemoglobin (Hb) concentration, like the Coulter Counter and the Quantitative Buffy Coat® (QBC®), are costly and not widely accessible in resource-limited settings. The point-of-care HemoCue® test is a cheaper alternative and suitable in rural areas. The study aimed to determine the level of agreement between Coulter Counter/QBC® vs. HemoCue®-measured Hb concentrations by Bland-Altman analysis.
As part of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of single low-dose primaquine in Ugandan and Congolese children with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, Hb concentrations were measured on days 0, 3, 7, and 28 using Coulter Counter (Uganda, n = 1880 paired values), QBC® (DR Congo, n = 1984 paired values) and HemoCue® Hb-301™. The predefined clinically acceptable limits were set at ± 0.5 g/dL.
The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the HemoCue® minus Coulter Counter mean Hb difference was - 0.15 g/dL with lower and upper limits of agreement of - 3.68 g/dL and 3.39 g/dL, respectively. Corresponding HemoCue® minus QBC® values were - 0.23 g/dL, - 1.66 g/dL and 1.22 g/dL. Linear regression of Hb concentration differences vs. mean Hb concentrations showed negative correlations: r = - 0.43 and r = - 0.34 for HemoCue® vs. Coulter Counter and HemoCue® vs. QBC®, respectively.
Compared to Coulter and QBC®, mean HemoCue® measured Hb concentrations were lower and, compared to the Coulter or QBC® methods, had an overall tendency to measure lower Hb concentrations with increasing Hb concentrations. Upper and lower limits of agreement were wider than the predefined clinically acceptable limits of ± 0.5 g/dL. HemoCue® should be used with caution in settings where decisions about blood transfusions are made.
贫血是疟疾的有害后果,其准确诊断对于有效管理至关重要。然而,用于测量血红蛋白(Hb)浓度的实验室方法,如库尔特计数器和定量血沉棕黄层(QBC®),成本高昂,在资源有限的环境中无法广泛使用。即时检测的HemoCue®检测是一种更便宜的替代方法,适用于农村地区。本研究旨在通过Bland-Altman分析确定库尔特计数器/QBC®与HemoCue®测量的Hb浓度之间的一致性水平。
作为在乌干达和刚果儿童中进行的单剂量低剂量伯氨喹治疗急性单纯性恶性疟原虫疟疾的随机、安慰剂对照试验的一部分,在第0、3、7和28天使用库尔特计数器(乌干达,n = 1880对配对值)、QBC®(刚果民主共和国,n = 1984对配对值)和HemoCue® Hb-301™测量Hb浓度。预定义的临床可接受限度设定为±0.5 g/dL。
Bland-Altman分析显示,HemoCue®减去库尔特计数器的平均Hb差值为-0.15 g/dL,一致性下限和上限分别为-3.68 g/dL和3.39 g/dL。相应的HemoCue®减去QBC®的值为-0.23 g/dL、-1.66 g/dL和1.22 g/dL。Hb浓度差值与平均Hb浓度的线性回归显示出负相关:HemoCue®与库尔特计数器相比,r = -0.43;HemoCue®与QBC®相比,r = -0.34。
与库尔特计数器和QBC®相比,HemoCue®测量的平均Hb浓度较低,并且与库尔特或QBC®方法相比,随着Hb浓度的增加,总体上有测量较低Hb浓度的趋势。一致性的上限和下限比预定义的临床可接受限度±0.5 g/dL更宽。在做出输血决策的环境中,应谨慎使用HemoCue®。