• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入前基因检测(PGT)在评估胚胎基因状态方面的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Kexin, Hu Zhixin, Lian Yuxuan, Han Youzhen, Zhou Xiaoting, Li Yonggang, Xiang Lifeng, Jiang Weiqun, Li Mingying, Zeng Peng, Zhang Manqin, Luo Xi, Xu Yongfang, Zheng Haishan, Tian Mei, Wang Mei, Ma Rui, Yang Jichun, Bai Yun, Du Ruiyu, Deng Bo, Wu Ze, Li Yunxiu, Yan Jiacong

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, NHC Key Laboratory of Healthy Birth and Birth Defect Prevention in Western China, First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, 650500, China.

KUST-YPFPH Reproductive Medicine Joint Research Center, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1
PMID:40069837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11895315/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is widely used in assisted reproduction to assess the genetic status of embryos. However, increasing evidence suggests that the trophectoderm (TE) may not fully reflect the genetic status of the inner cell mass (ICM), raising controversy about the accuracy of TE biopsy. Research in recent years has focused on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) found in blastocoel fluid (BF) and spent culture medium (SCM), as these may contain genetic information from both the TE and ICM. Therefore, further research and validation are essential to determine the reliability and clinical applicability of these diagnostic methods in PGT.

METHODS

Relevant studies published between January 2000 and August 2024 were identified through PubMed and Web of Science (WOS). Risk assessment and publication bias were evaluated using QUADAS-2 and Deek's test. Diagnostic meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to combine sensitivity and specificity, with results visualized through forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.

RESULTS

Out of 6,407 initially screened records, 36 studies involving 4,230 embryos were included. TE biopsy was identified as the best method for diagnosing the genetic status of embryos (sensitivity: 0.839; specificity: 0.791, AUC: 0.878), while SCM had slightly lower accuracy (sensitivity: 0.874; specificity: 0.719, AUC: 0.869). The effectiveness of BF (AUC: 0.656) was significantly lower than that of TE biopsy and SCM. Despite this, TE biopsy has not yet achieved ideal diagnostic performance. However, TE biopsies demonstrate a high level of accuracy in diagnosing PGT-SR (AUC: 0.957). Additionally, multiple TE biopsies (AUC: 0.966) or TE biopsies combined with SCM (AUC: 0.927) can enhance the diagnostic efficiency of PGT.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that TE biopsy has yet to achieve optimal diagnostic accuracy, which may result in a significant number of missed embryo diagnoses and misdiagnoses. Our results confirm that SCM has the potential to serve as a supplementary test. Employing multiple biopsies or combining TE with SCM may enhance diagnostic efficiency and yield optimal results.

摘要

背景

胚胎植入前基因检测(PGT)在辅助生殖中被广泛用于评估胚胎的基因状态。然而,越来越多的证据表明,滋养外胚层(TE)可能无法完全反映内细胞团(ICM)的基因状态,这引发了关于TE活检准确性的争议。近年来的研究集中在囊胚腔液(BF)和废弃培养基(SCM)中发现的游离DNA(cfDNA),因为这些可能包含来自TE和ICM的基因信息。因此,进一步的研究和验证对于确定这些诊断方法在PGT中的可靠性和临床适用性至关重要。

方法

通过PubMed和科学网(WOS)检索2000年1月至2024年8月发表的相关研究。使用QUADAS-2和Deek检验评估风险评估和发表偏倚。采用双变量模型进行诊断性Meta分析,以合并敏感性和特异性,并通过森林图和汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线直观呈现结果。

结果

在最初筛选的6407条记录中,纳入了36项涉及4230个胚胎的研究。TE活检被确定为诊断胚胎基因状态的最佳方法(敏感性:0.839;特异性:0.791,AUC:0.878),而SCM的准确性略低(敏感性:0.874;特异性:0.719,AUC:0.869)。BF的有效性(AUC:0.656)显著低于TE活检和SCM。尽管如此,TE活检尚未达到理想的诊断性能。然而,TE活检在诊断PGT-SR方面显示出较高的准确性(AUC:0.957)。此外,多次TE活检(AUC:0.966)或TE活检与SCM联合使用(AUC:0.927)可以提高PGT的诊断效率。

结论

本研究结果表明,TE活检尚未达到最佳诊断准确性,这可能导致大量胚胎漏诊和误诊。我们的结果证实SCM有潜力作为一种补充检测方法。采用多次活检或结合TE与SCM可能会提高诊断效率并产生最佳结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/536d44b76f17/12958_2025_1376_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/3ba8aeac7284/12958_2025_1376_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/da511bac15b8/12958_2025_1376_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/e8e5fe20b983/12958_2025_1376_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/d711d4d68078/12958_2025_1376_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/536d44b76f17/12958_2025_1376_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/3ba8aeac7284/12958_2025_1376_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/da511bac15b8/12958_2025_1376_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/e8e5fe20b983/12958_2025_1376_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/d711d4d68078/12958_2025_1376_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe6/11895315/536d44b76f17/12958_2025_1376_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.植入前基因检测(PGT)在评估胚胎基因状态方面的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.
2
The clinicians´ dilemma with mosaicism-an insight from inner cell mass biopsies.临床医生在嵌合体问题上面临的困境——内细胞团活检的启示。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):998-1010. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez055.
3
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study.对可能存在嵌合体的囊胚进行非侵入性植入前遗传学检测:一项初步研究。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):2020-2034. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab080.
4
The use of copy number loads to designate mosaicism in blastocyst stage PGT-A cycles: fewer is better.在囊胚期植入前基因检测-非整倍体(PGT-A)周期中使用拷贝数负荷来确定嵌合现象:越少越好。
Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):982-991. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead049.
5
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?非侵入性胚胎植入前遗传学检测(niPGT):生殖遗传学的下一次革命?
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):16-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz033.
6
Extended in vitro culture of human embryos demonstrates the complex nature of diagnosing chromosomal mosaicism from a single trophectoderm biopsy.人类胚胎的体外培养时间延长,表明从单个滋养外胚层活检中诊断染色体嵌合体的复杂性。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Apr 1;34(4):758-769. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez012.
7
Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using blastocyst spent culture medium may serve as a backup of trophectoderm biopsy in conventional preimplantation genetic testing.使用囊胚废弃培养液进行非侵入性胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测可作为传统胚胎植入前基因检测中外胚层活检的备用方法。
BMC Med Genomics. 2025 Feb 21;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12920-025-02106-7.
8
Validation of preimplantation genetic tests for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with DNA from spent culture media (SCM): concordance assessment and implication.使用胚胎培养液(SCM)中的 DNA 进行非整倍体(PGT-A)的植入前遗传学检测(PGT-A)的验证:一致性评估及其意义。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Mar 6;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00714-3.
9
Diagnostic efficacy of blastocoel fluid and spent media as sources of DNA for preimplantation genetic testing in standard clinical conditions.囊胚腔液和废弃培养液作为 DNA 来源用于标准临床条件下的植入前遗传学检测的诊断效能。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Oct;110(5):870-879.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.031.
10
Single-cell multi-omics sequencing reveals chromosome copy number inconsistency between trophectoderm and inner cell mass in human reconstituted embryos after spindle transfer.单细胞多组学测序揭示了纺锤体转移后重构人类胚胎滋养外胚层和内细胞团之间的染色体拷贝数不一致。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Nov 2;38(11):2137-2153. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead186.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of double biopsy and double vitrification on the clinical outcomes following euploid blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双倍活检和双倍玻璃化对整倍体囊胚移植后临床结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hum Reprod. 2024 Dec 1;39(12):2674-2684. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae235.
2
Influence of the number of washings for embryos on non-invasive preimplantation chromosome screening results.胚胎洗涤次数对胚胎非整倍体筛查结果的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 26;15:1363851. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1363851. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world study.
从取卵周期开始探索胚胎植入前非整倍体遗传学检测的疗效和受益人群:一项真实世界研究。
J Transl Med. 2023 Nov 2;21(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04641-2.
4
The Comparison of Two Whole-Genome Amplification Approaches for Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (ni-PGT) and the Application Scenario of ni-PGT during the Fresh Cycle.两种全基因组扩增方法在非侵入性胚胎植入前遗传学检测(ni-PGT)中的比较,以及在新鲜周期中进行 ni-PGT 的应用场景。
J Mol Diagn. 2023 Dec;25(12):945-956. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis: does pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy at the blastocyst stage improve live birth rate?系统评价与荟萃分析:囊胚期胚胎非整倍体筛查能否提高活产率?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Oct;40(10):2297-2316. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02866-0. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
6
SCM is potential resource for non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing based on human embryos single-cell sequencing.单细胞悬液是基于人类胚胎单细胞测序的非侵入性植入前基因检测的潜在资源。
Gene. 2023 Oct 5;882:147647. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147647. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
7
Effects of NGS-based PGT-a for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure: a retrospective cohort study.基于 NGS 的 PGT-a 对不明原因复发性妊娠丢失和着床失败的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2023 Oct;69(5):354-365. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2023.2225679. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Effectiveness of non-invasive chromosomal screening for normal karyotype and chromosomal rearrangements.无创染色体筛查对正常核型和染色体重排的有效性。
Front Genet. 2023 Mar 13;14:1036467. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1036467. eCollection 2023.
9
Does maternal age affect assisted reproduction technology success rates after euploid embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.母亲年龄是否会影响整倍体胚胎移植后辅助生殖技术的成功率?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2023 Aug;120(2):251-265. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.036. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
10
Association of maternal risk factors with fetal aneuploidy and the accuracy of prenatal aneuploidy screening: a correlation analysis based on 12,186 karyotype reports.母体危险因素与胎儿非整倍体的关系及产前非整倍体筛查的准确性:基于 12186 例核型报告的相关性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 2;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05461-4.