• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种全基因组扩增方法在非侵入性胚胎植入前遗传学检测(ni-PGT)中的比较,以及在新鲜周期中进行 ni-PGT 的应用场景。

The Comparison of Two Whole-Genome Amplification Approaches for Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (ni-PGT) and the Application Scenario of ni-PGT during the Fresh Cycle.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China.

Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2023 Dec;25(12):945-956. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.005
PMID:37806432
Abstract

Recently, noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) using degenerate oligonucleotide primer PCR (DOP-PCR) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle (MALBAC)-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) methods has demonstrated predictable results in embryo testing. However, a considerable heterogeneity of results has been reported in numerous studies on these two WGA methods. Our aim was to evaluate the current WGA method for ni-PGT while further clarifying the applicable scenarios of ni-PGT in the fresh cycle. A total of 173 embryos were tested with trophectoderm biopsy and ni-PGT. In the whole preimplantation genetic testing, the clinical concordance rates of the detection results of DOP-PCR and MALBAC with the corresponding trophectoderm biopsy results were 64.12% (84/131) and 68.99% (89/129), respectively (P = 0.405). However, in the detection of abnormal embryos, the detection efficiency of ni-PGT is significantly improved [MALBAC: 96.55% versus 68.99% (P < 0.001); and DOP-PCR: 89.09% versus 64.12% (P < 0.001)]. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of ni-PGT in low-quality blastocysts was significantly higher than that in high-quality blastocysts [MALBAC: 95.24% versus 51.85% (P = 0.001); and DOP-PCR: 91.30% versus 48.15% (P = 0.001)]. These results contribute to further understanding ni-PGT and to clarifying its application scenario in the fresh cycle.

摘要

最近,使用退化寡核苷酸引物 PCR(DOP-PCR)和多重退火和环化扩增循环(MALBAC)基全基因组扩增(WGA)方法的非侵入性胚胎植入前遗传学检测(ni-PGT)已在胚胎检测中显示出可预测的结果。然而,在这两种 WGA 方法的许多研究中,报告了相当大的结果异质性。我们的目的是评估当前的 ni-PGT WGA 方法,同时进一步阐明 ni-PGT 在新鲜周期中的适用场景。共对 173 个胚胎进行了滋养外胚层活检和 ni-PGT 检测。在整个胚胎植入前遗传学检测中,DOP-PCR 和 MALBAC 的检测结果与相应的滋养外胚层活检结果的临床一致性率分别为 64.12%(84/131)和 68.99%(89/129)(P=0.405)。然而,在异常胚胎的检测中,ni-PGT 的检测效率显著提高[MALBAC:96.55%比 68.99%(P<0.001);DOP-PCR:89.09%比 64.12%(P<0.001)]。此外,ni-PGT 在低质量囊胚中的诊断效率显著高于高质量囊胚[MALBAC:95.24%比 51.85%(P=0.001);DOP-PCR:91.30%比 48.15%(P=0.001)]。这些结果有助于进一步了解 ni-PGT,并阐明其在新鲜周期中的应用场景。

相似文献

1
The Comparison of Two Whole-Genome Amplification Approaches for Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (ni-PGT) and the Application Scenario of ni-PGT during the Fresh Cycle.两种全基因组扩增方法在非侵入性胚胎植入前遗传学检测(ni-PGT)中的比较,以及在新鲜周期中进行 ni-PGT 的应用场景。
J Mol Diagn. 2023 Dec;25(12):945-956. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
2
The true incidence of chromosomal mosaicism after preimplantation genetic testing is much lower than that indicated by trophectoderm biopsy.胚胎植入前遗传学检测后真正的染色体嵌合率比滋养外胚层活检所显示的要低得多。
Hum Reprod. 2021 May 17;36(6):1691-1701. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab064.
3
Performance comparison of two whole genome amplification techniques in frame of multifactor preimplantation genetic testing.两种全基因组扩增技术在多重植入前遗传学检测中的性能比较。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Aug;35(8):1457-1472. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1187-4. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
4
Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for putative mosaic blastocysts: a pilot study.对可能存在嵌合体的囊胚进行非侵入性植入前遗传学检测:一项初步研究。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):2020-2034. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab080.
5
Clinical application of NGS-based SNP haplotyping for PGT-M of methylmalonic acidemia.基于 NGS 的 SNP 单体型分析在甲基丙二酸血症 PGT-M 中的临床应用。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2022 Feb;68(1):80-88. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2021.2005718. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
6
Minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing using blastocyst culture medium.利用囊胚培养液进行微创型胚胎植入前遗传学检测。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1369-1379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez075.
7
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.体外受精中对非整倍体(染色体数量异常)进行植入前基因检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3.
8
Appropriate whole genome amplification and pathogenic loci detection can improve the accuracy of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for deletional α-thalassemia.适当的全基因组扩增和致病基因座检测可提高缺失型α-地中海贫血症胚胎植入前遗传学诊断的准确性。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 8;14:1176063. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1176063. eCollection 2023.
9
Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy exhibits high rates of deoxyribonucleic acid amplification failure and poor correlation with results obtained using trophectoderm biopsy.非侵入性的胚胎植入前遗传学检测对于非整倍体的检测存在脱氧核糖核酸扩增失败率高和与滋养外胚层活检结果相关性差的问题。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jun;115(6):1461-1470. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
10
GENType: all-in-one preimplantation genetic testing by pedigree haplotyping and copy number profiling suitable for third-party reproduction.基因型: 基于家系单体型和拷贝数分析的一站式胚胎植入前遗传学检测, 适用于第三方生殖。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Jun 30;37(7):1678-1691. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac088.

引用本文的文献

1
The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.植入前基因检测(PGT)在评估胚胎基因状态方面的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.