Scotton William J, Shand Cameron, Todd Emily G, Bocchetta Martina, Kobylecki Christopher, Cash David M, VandeVrede Lawren, Heuer Hilary W, Quaegebeur Annelies, Young Alexandra L, Oxtoby Neil, Alexander Daniel, Rowe James B, Morris Huw R, Boxer Adam L, Rohrer Jonathan D, Wijeratne Peter A
Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK.
Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK.
Brain Commun. 2025 Feb 11;7(2):fcaf066. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf066. eCollection 2025.
Although the corticobasal syndrome was originally most closely linked with the pathology of corticobasal degeneration, the 2013 Armstrong clinical diagnostic criteria, without the addition of aetiology-specific biomarkers, have limited positive predictive value for identifying corticobasal degeneration pathology in life. Autopsy studies demonstrate considerable pathological heterogeneity in corticobasal syndrome, with corticobasal degeneration pathology accounting for only ∼50% of clinically diagnosed individuals. Individualized disease stage and progression modelling of brain changes in corticobasal syndrome may have utility in predicting this underlying pathological heterogeneity, and in turn improve the design of clinical trials for emerging disease-modifying therapies. The aim of this study was to jointly model the phenotypic and temporal heterogeneity of corticobasal syndrome, to identify unique imaging subtypes based solely on a data-driven assessment of MRI atrophy patterns and then investigate whether these subtypes provide information on the underlying pathology. We applied Subtype and Stage Inference, a machine learning algorithm that identifies groups of individuals with distinct biomarker progression patterns, to a large cohort of 135 individuals with corticobasal syndrome (52 had a pathological or biomarker defined diagnosis) and 252 controls. The model was fit using volumetric features extracted from baseline T1-weighted MRI scans and then used to subtype and stage follow-up scans. The subtypes and stages at follow-up were used to validate the longitudinal consistency of the baseline subtype and stage assignments. We then investigated whether there were differences in associated pathology and clinical phenotype between the subtypes. Subtype and Stage Inference identified at least two distinct and longitudinally stable spatiotemporal subtypes of atrophy progression in corticobasal syndrome; four-repeat-tauopathy confirmed cases were most commonly assigned to the subtype (83% of individuals with progressive supranuclear palsy pathology and 75% of individuals with corticobasal-degeneration pathology), whilst those with Alzheimer's pathology were most commonly assigned to the (81% of individuals). Subtype assignment was stable at follow-up (98% of cases), and individuals consistently progressed to higher stages (100% stayed at the same stage or progressed), supporting the model's ability to stage progression. By jointly modelling disease stage and subtype, we provide data-driven evidence for at least two distinct and longitudinally stable spatiotemporal subtypes of atrophy in corticobasal syndrome that are associated with different underlying pathologies. In the absence of sensitive and specific biomarkers, accurately subtyping and staging individuals with corticobasal syndrome at baseline has important implications for screening on entry into clinical trials, as well as for tracking disease progression.
尽管皮质基底节综合征最初与皮质基底节变性的病理学联系最为紧密,但2013年阿姆斯特朗临床诊断标准在未添加病因特异性生物标志物的情况下,对于在生前识别皮质基底节变性病理学的阳性预测价值有限。尸检研究表明,皮质基底节综合征存在相当大的病理异质性,皮质基底节变性病理学仅占临床诊断个体的约50%。皮质基底节综合征脑变化的个体化疾病阶段和进展建模可能有助于预测这种潜在的病理异质性,进而改善新兴疾病修饰疗法的临床试验设计。本研究的目的是联合对皮质基底节综合征的表型和时间异质性进行建模,仅基于对MRI萎缩模式的数据驱动评估来识别独特的影像亚型,然后研究这些亚型是否能提供有关潜在病理学的信息。我们将一种机器学习算法“亚型和阶段推断”应用于135例皮质基底节综合征患者(52例有病理或生物标志物定义的诊断)和252例对照的大型队列,该算法可识别具有不同生物标志物进展模式的个体组。使用从基线T1加权MRI扫描中提取的体积特征对模型进行拟合,然后用于对随访扫描进行亚型划分和阶段评估。随访时的亚型和阶段用于验证基线亚型和阶段分配的纵向一致性。然后,我们研究了各亚型之间在相关病理学和临床表型上是否存在差异。“亚型和阶段推断”识别出皮质基底节综合征中至少两种不同且纵向稳定的萎缩进展时空亚型;四重复tau蛋白病确诊病例最常被归入 亚型(进行性核上性麻痹病理学个体中的83%以及皮质基底节变性病理学个体中的75%),而患有阿尔茨海默病病理学的个体最常被归入 亚型(个体中的81%)。亚型分配在随访时是稳定的(98%的病例),并且个体持续进展到更高阶段(100%保持在同一阶段或进展),这支持了该模型进行阶段进展评估的能力。通过联合对疾病阶段和亚型进行建模,我们提供了数据驱动的证据,证明皮质基底节综合征中至少有两种不同且纵向稳定的萎缩时空亚型与不同的潜在病理学相关。在缺乏敏感和特异生物标志物的情况下,在基线时准确对皮质基底节综合征患者进行亚型划分和阶段评估对于筛选进入临床试验以及跟踪疾病进展具有重要意义。