Keulen Mark Hf, Boonen Bert, Leenders Alexandra M, Van Haaren Emil H, Schotanus Martijn Gm, Bemelmans Yoeri Fl
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, NLD.
School of Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, NLD.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 9;17(2):e78781. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78781. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Background Outpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) of the hip and knee is becoming increasingly popular within the orthopedic community. Most evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of OJA has been gathered from the perspectives of surgeons and healthcare organizations. However, the success of these pathways also hinges on patients feeling safe and adequately prepared to return home. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives, experiences, and challenges during the preoperative phase, the day of surgery, and the postoperative phase of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Materials and methods Twelve patients who underwent outpatient THA or TKA and their informal caregivers participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, following the Grounded Theory approach. Results OJA was well received by patients, with 33% making a patient-driven decision to undergo the pathway, while the majority supported the idea following their surgeon's recommendation. Key areas for enhancing the patient experience included better preoperative education and expectation management, streamlined pathway logistics, and reassurance through robust intra- and extramural safety nets. Notably, 92% of patients indicated they would choose OJA again over an inpatient procedure if faced with the same decision. Conclusions Although patients were generally very satisfied with outpatient THA and TKA, the findings create scope to refine existing pathways further. Additionally, interview insights suggest potential improvements to patient selection criteria to identify suitable candidates for OJA better.
背景 髋膝关节门诊关节置换术(OJA)在骨科领域越来越受欢迎。关于OJA安全性和可行性的大多数证据是从外科医生和医疗机构的角度收集的。然而,这些手术路径的成功还取决于患者是否感到安全以及是否做好了充分的回家准备。本研究旨在探讨患者在门诊全髋关节置换术(THA)或全膝关节置换术(TKA)的术前阶段、手术当天和术后阶段的观点、经历和挑战。同时也评估了患者满意度。
材料和方法 12例接受门诊THA或TKA的患者及其非正式护理人员参与了面对面的半结构化访谈。采用扎根理论方法,对访谈记录进行主题分析。
结果 OJA受到患者的好评,33%的患者自主决定选择该手术路径,而大多数患者在听从外科医生的建议后支持这一想法。改善患者体验的关键领域包括更好的术前教育和期望管理、简化手术流程后勤安排,以及通过强大的院内和院外安全保障措施给予患者安心感。值得注意的是,92%的患者表示,如果面临同样的选择,他们会再次选择OJA而非住院手术。
结论 尽管患者总体上对门诊THA和TKA非常满意,但研究结果仍有进一步完善现有手术路径的空间。此外,访谈见解表明,可能需要改进患者选择标准,以便更好地确定适合OJA的患者。