• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在连续姿势选择任务中,哪些因素会影响计划复用?

Which factors influence plan reuse in a sequential posture selection task?

作者信息

Schütz Christoph

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 25;16:1423408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1423408. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1423408
PMID:40070908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11894580/
Abstract

In a sequential posture selection task, we reuse former motor plans to reduce cognitive planning cost. The resulting persistence in the former posture, termed motor hysteresis, can serve as a proxy for the percentage of motor plan reuse (PoR). A recent study showed a significant drop in PoR if participants were asked to skip every second drawer in a sequential drawer opening task. In the current study, we sought to disentangle four confounded factors that were potentially responsible for this drop in PoR: a change of (1) spatial distance, (2) digit distance, (3) number of drawers, or (4) context (presence of skipped drawers). To this end, two groups of participants were tested in a series of sequential drawer tasks, where each of the four potential influencing factors was varied independently. PoR was calculated as the dependent variable. Participants displayed a hysteresis effect in all ordered tasks, but the PoR was only reduced by an increase in spatial distance. The three remaining factors had no significant effect. This finding indicates that motor planning is only affected by local (spatial) parameters of the task, but not by context factors (digits, skipped drawers) or global parameters such as the number of drawers.

摘要

在一个连续姿势选择任务中,我们重新利用先前的运动计划以降低认知规划成本。在先前姿势中产生的持续性,即所谓的运动滞后,可以作为运动计划重用百分比(PoR)的一个替代指标。最近的一项研究表明,如果要求参与者在连续打开抽屉任务中每隔一个抽屉跳过一次,PoR会显著下降。在当前的研究中,我们试图厘清可能导致PoR下降的四个混淆因素:(1)空间距离、(2)数字距离、(3)抽屉数量或(4)情境(是否存在跳过的抽屉)的变化。为此,两组参与者在一系列连续抽屉任务中接受测试,其中四个潜在影响因素中的每一个都独立变化。PoR作为因变量进行计算。参与者在所有有序任务中都表现出滞后效应,但PoR仅因空间距离的增加而降低。其余三个因素没有显著影响。这一发现表明,运动规划仅受任务的局部(空间)参数影响,而不受情境因素(数字、跳过的抽屉)或诸如抽屉数量等全局参数的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/3fdf5a0867aa/fpsyg-16-1423408-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/581d05ca266b/fpsyg-16-1423408-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/ca1449db732a/fpsyg-16-1423408-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/3fdf5a0867aa/fpsyg-16-1423408-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/581d05ca266b/fpsyg-16-1423408-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/ca1449db732a/fpsyg-16-1423408-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/11894580/3fdf5a0867aa/fpsyg-16-1423408-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Which factors influence plan reuse in a sequential posture selection task?在连续姿势选择任务中,哪些因素会影响计划复用?
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 25;16:1423408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1423408. eCollection 2025.
2
A Simple Model to Estimate the Percentage of Motor Plan Reuse From Hysteresis Effect Size.一种通过滞后效应大小估算运动计划重复使用率的简单模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 14;10:561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00561. eCollection 2019.
3
Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.大脑两半球侧化并不影响序列运动任务的认知和机械成本。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3133-3142. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05652-6. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.姿势选择的运动计划不会在双手之间转移。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 11;6:1358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01358. eCollection 2015.
5
Cognitive costs of motor planning do not differ between pointing and grasping in a sequential task.在连续任务中,指向和抓握动作的运动规划认知成本并无差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):2035-2043. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4608-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
6
Working memory load does not affect sequential motor planning.工作记忆负荷不影响序列运动规划。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103091. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103091. Epub 2020 May 30.
7
Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.机械负荷对序贯效应的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;228(4):445-55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3576-3. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
8
Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.在顺序抓握和指向任务中,任务关键关节不存在运动滞后现象。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4831-1. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
9
Whole-body posture planning in anticipation of a manual prehension task: prospective and retrospective effects.预期手动抓握任务时的全身姿势规划:前瞻性和回顾性影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Oct;144(2):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
10
Less motor (re-)planning requires fewer working memory resources.较少的运动(再)规划需要较少的工作记忆资源。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Dec;240(12):3237-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06491-8. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Less motor (re-)planning requires fewer working memory resources.较少的运动(再)规划需要较少的工作记忆资源。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Dec;240(12):3237-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06491-8. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Working memory load does not affect sequential motor planning.工作记忆负荷不影响序列运动规划。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103091. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103091. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.大脑两半球侧化并不影响序列运动任务的认知和机械成本。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3133-3142. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05652-6. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
A Simple Model to Estimate the Percentage of Motor Plan Reuse From Hysteresis Effect Size.一种通过滞后效应大小估算运动计划重复使用率的简单模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 14;10:561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00561. eCollection 2019.
5
Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.在顺序抓握和指向任务中,任务关键关节不存在运动滞后现象。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):703-712. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4831-1. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
6
Cognitive costs of motor planning do not differ between pointing and grasping in a sequential task.在连续任务中,指向和抓握动作的运动规划认知成本并无差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):2035-2043. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4608-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
7
Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.姿势选择的运动计划不会在双手之间转移。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 11;6:1358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01358. eCollection 2015.
8
Serial dependence in visual perception.视觉感知中的序列依赖。
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):738-43. doi: 10.1038/nn.3689. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
9
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
10
Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.机械负荷对序贯效应的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;228(4):445-55. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3576-3. Epub 2013 Jun 1.