• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚美尼亚实施无烟家庭的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。

Facilitators and barriers to implementing smoke-free homes in Armenia: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Torosyan Arevik, Grigoryan Lilit, Hayrumyan Varduhi, Sargsyan Zhanna, Bhanot Palash, Shaffer Lillian, Petrosyan Varduhi, Bazarchyan Alexander, Alayan Nour, Kegler Michelle C, Berg Carla J

机构信息

National Institute of Health Named After Academician S. Avdalbekyan, MOH, Yerevan, Armenia.

Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia.

出版信息

Glob Health Promot. 2025 Mar 12:17579759251318728. doi: 10.1177/17579759251318728.

DOI:10.1177/17579759251318728
PMID:40071452
Abstract

Smoke-free homes (SFHs) reduce secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe), which is particularly crucial where smoking prevalence is high and public smoke-free policies are nascent, as in some low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examined perspectives regarding SFHs, including barriers and facilitators, among adults in Armenia, a LMIC with high male smoking prevalence and recently-implemented smoke-free policies. In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted with adults reporting smoking and non-smoking, separately, in two Armenian communities ( = 39; = 41.00, 46.2% female, 61.5% married, 74.4% children in household). Data were examined using thematic analysis. All participants reporting smoking ( = 18) were male, non-smoking participants ( = 21) were primarily (87.5%) female, 53.8% had no SFH restrictions and 12.8% partial. Commonly, smoking was allowed for certain people (e.g. guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g. kitchen, balcony). Common SFH motives were health of children and vulnerable adults (e.g. pregnant women). Salient challenges included high male smoking rates paired with hierarchical gender roles. When asked about strategies to promote SFHs, many suggested leveraging children by involving them in a SFH intervention or emphasizing SHSe's impact on children. While some suggested empowering women as change agents, others suggested targeting men. It is crucial that SFH interventions for Armenian households address Armenia's specific characteristics, such as high male smoking rates and more hierarchical social dynamics. Effective SFH interventions for Armenia may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.

摘要

无烟家庭(SFHs)可减少二手烟暴露(SHSe),这在吸烟率高且无烟公共政策刚刚起步的地方尤为关键,比如一些低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。本研究调查了亚美尼亚成年人对无烟家庭的看法,包括障碍和促进因素。亚美尼亚是一个男性吸烟率高且最近实施了无烟政策的低收入和中等收入国家。2024年2月至3月,在亚美尼亚的两个社区分别对报告吸烟和不吸烟的成年人进行了焦点小组访谈(n = 39;平均年龄 = 41.00岁,46.2%为女性,61.5%已婚,74.4%的家庭中有孩子)。使用主题分析法对数据进行了分析。所有报告吸烟的参与者(n = 18)均为男性,不吸烟的参与者(n = 21)主要为女性(87.5%),53.8%的家庭没有无烟家庭限制,12.8%的家庭有部分限制。通常,某些人(如客人)或房间/空间(如厨房、阳台)允许吸烟。无烟家庭的常见动机是儿童和弱势成年人(如孕妇)的健康。突出的挑战包括男性吸烟率高以及等级分明的性别角色。当被问及促进无烟家庭的策略时,许多人建议通过让儿童参与无烟家庭干预或强调二手烟暴露对儿童的影响来利用儿童。虽然一些人建议赋予女性变革推动者的权力,但另一些人建议针对男性。至关重要的是,针对亚美尼亚家庭的无烟家庭干预措施要考虑到亚美尼亚的具体特征,比如男性吸烟率高以及社会动态等级更为分明。针对亚美尼亚有效的无烟家庭干预措施可为其他具有类似特征的国家提供范例。

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to implementing smoke-free homes in Armenia: a qualitative study.亚美尼亚实施无烟家庭的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
Glob Health Promot. 2025 Mar 12:17579759251318728. doi: 10.1177/17579759251318728.
2
Smoke-free home restrictions in Armenia and Georgia: motives, barriers and secondhand smoke reduction behaviors.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的无烟家庭限制:动机、障碍和减少二手烟行为。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;33(5):864-871. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad129.
3
Tobacco-related risk perceptions, social influences and public smoke-free policies in relation to smoke-free home restrictions: findings from a baseline cross-sectional survey of Armenian and Georgian adults in a community randomised trial.与无烟家庭限制相关的与烟草相关的风险认知、社会影响和公共无烟政策:在社区随机试验中对亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚成年人进行的基线横断面调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e055396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055396.
4
Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Multifaceted Intervention Pilot.无烟家庭干预在永久性支持性住房中的应用:一项多方面干预试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa043.
5
Smoke-free homes: what are the barriers, motivators and enablers? A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.无烟家庭:有哪些障碍、动机因素和促进因素?一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010260.
6
Smokers' and non-smokers' secondhand smoke experiences and interactions to reduce exposure in Armenia and Georgia.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚吸烟者与非吸烟者的二手烟经历及减少暴露的相互作用
Tob Prev Cessat. 2021 Jan 29;7:6. doi: 10.18332/tpc/131059. eCollection 2021.
7
Factors associated with smoke-free homes in NSW: results from the 1998 NSW Health Survey.新南威尔士州无烟家庭的相关因素:1998年新南威尔士州健康调查结果
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Aug;25(4):339-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00590.x.
8
Smoke-Free Homes and Youth Smoking Behavior in Italy: Findings From the SIDRIAT Longitudinal Study.意大利无烟家庭与青少年吸烟行为:来自SIDRIAT纵向研究的结果
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2075-2082. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw149. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Implementing an Evidence-based Tobacco Control Program at Five 2-1-1 Call Centers: An Evaluation Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.在五个 2-1-1 呼叫中心实施基于证据的烟草控制项目:使用综合实施研究框架进行评估。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):180-187. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx232.
10
National and state prevalence of smoke-free rules in homes with and without children and smokers: Two decades of progress.有孩子和吸烟者家庭与无孩子和吸烟者家庭中无烟规定的全国及各州流行情况:二十年的进展。
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of global and Chinese trends in the burden of ischemic stroke attributable to secondhand smoke from 1990-2021.1990年至2021年全球及中国二手烟所致缺血性卒中负担趋势的比较分析。
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Jun 5;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/204510. eCollection 2025.