Shah Muhammad Waseem, Yan Qinyu, Pan Da, Sun Guiju
Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 25;17(5):795. doi: 10.3390/nu17050795.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Eating disorders, including food neophobia and restrictive eating behaviors, are pervasive among university students. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Scale (NIAS), Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS), Night Eating Syndrome Questionnaire (NESQ), Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) among university students in China and Pakistan to assess reliability and validity and explore the relationships between eating behaviors and mental health.
Initially, responses from 1056 university students from China and Pakistan were obtained, which were reduced to 1002 after screening. Sociodemographic data were collected. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed using SPSS and Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS).
The demographic data showed that 52% of the participants were female and 48% were male, with a mean age of 22.13 ± 3.86 years. Most were single (93.2%) and had a mean BMI of 22.06 ± 4.02 kg/m. The NIAS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.731), and the CFA revealed strong factor loadings (0.57-0.79). The DOS showed good psychometric properties (factor loadings: 0.53-0.77). The NESQ indicated higher night eating behaviors in Chinese students, who also had higher stress (PSS: Mean Difference = 4.116, 95% CI: 3.36-4.87) and depression (SDS: Mean Difference = 0.229, 95% CI: 0.19-0.27) compared to Pakistani students, who showed more restrictive eating behaviors (NIAS: Mean Difference = -0.422, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.33).
The psychometric evaluation demonstrated strong reliability and validity in assessing eating behaviors and mental health among university students in China and Pakistan. These findings highlight cultural differences, with Chinese students showing higher levels of stress and depression and Pakistani students exhibiting more restrictive eating behaviors. These results suggest the need for culturally tailored interventions to address food-related mental health issues and improve students' well-being.
背景/目的:饮食失调,包括食物恐新症和限制性饮食行为,在大学生中普遍存在。本研究评估了九项回避/限制性食物摄入障碍量表(NIAS)、杜塞尔多夫正食癖量表(DOS)、夜食综合征问卷(NESQ)、zung自评抑郁量表(SDS)和感知压力量表(PSS)在中国和巴基斯坦大学生中的心理测量特性,以评估其信度和效度,并探讨饮食行为与心理健康之间的关系。
最初获得了来自中国和巴基斯坦的1056名大学生的回复,筛选后减少到1002名。收集了社会人口统计学数据。使用SPSS和结构方程建模(AMOS)进行描述性统计、信度分析和验证性因素分析(CFA)。
人口统计学数据显示,52%的参与者为女性,48%为男性,平均年龄为22.13±3.86岁。大多数人单身(93.2%),平均BMI为22.06±4.02kg/m。NIAS显示出较高的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数:0.731),CFA显示出较强的因子载荷(0.57 - 0.79)。DOS显示出良好的心理测量特性(因子载荷:0.53 - 0.77)。NESQ表明,中国学生的夜食行为较多,与巴基斯坦学生相比,他们的压力(PSS:平均差异 = 4.116,95%置信区间:3.36 - 4.87)和抑郁(SDS:平均差异 = 0.229,95%置信区间:0.19 - 0.27)水平也较高,而巴基斯坦学生表现出更多的限制性饮食行为(NIAS:平均差异 = -0.422,95%置信区间:-0.51至-0.33)。
心理测量评估在评估中国和巴基斯坦大学生的饮食行为和心理健康方面显示出很强的信度和效度。这些发现突出了文化差异,中国学生表现出较高的压力和抑郁水平,而巴基斯坦学生表现出更多的限制性饮食行为。这些结果表明需要进行文化定制干预,以解决与食物相关的心理健康问题并改善学生的幸福感。