• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Editorial to "Can lead damage be ruled out using defibrillation threshold testing in patients with very high-impedance shock leads?".

作者信息

Temma Taro, Anzai Toshihisa

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.

出版信息

J Arrhythm. 2025 Mar 12;41(2):e70040. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70040. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/joa3.70040
PMID:40078464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11899749/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Editorial to "Can lead damage be ruled out using defibrillation threshold testing in patients with very high-impedance shock leads?".《关于“对于具有非常高阻抗休克导线的患者，能否通过除颤阈值测试排除铅损伤？”的社论》
J Arrhythm. 2025 Mar 12;41(2):e70040. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70040. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Editorial to "Can lead damage be ruled out using defibrillation threshold testing in patients with very high-impedance shock leads?": Beyond the numbers: Reconsidering high shock impedance in ICD leads with DFT testing.《“对于高阻抗休克导线患者，能否通过除颤阈值测试排除铅损伤？”的社论》：超越数字：通过DFT测试重新审视植入式心律转复除颤器导线中的高休克阻抗
J Arrhythm. 2025 Mar 4;41(2):e70032. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70032. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Can lead damage be ruled out using defibrillation threshold testing in patients with very high-impedance shock leads?对于具有非常高阻抗休克导联的患者，能否通过除颤阈值测试排除导联损伤？
J Arrhythm. 2025 Feb 12;41(1):e70014. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70014. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Usefulness of lead repositioning from left to right sternal border for a patient with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator showing high defibrillation threshold.对于皮下植入式心律转复除颤器患者，将电极从左侧重新放置到胸骨右缘对显示高除颤阈值的有效性。
J Arrhythm. 2018 Dec 7;35(1):133-135. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12145. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Effects of shock polarity reversal on defibrillation threshold in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器中电击极性反转对除颤阈值的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 May;65(5):495-500; discussion 501-2.
6
High shocking and pacing impedances due to defibrillation lead calcification.因除颤电极导线上的钙化物而导致的高电击和起搏阻抗。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;58(3):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00685-x. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
7
Retrospective evaluation of current-based impedance compensation defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.回顾性评估院外心脏骤停时基于电流的阻抗补偿除颤。
Resuscitation. 2013 May;84(5):580-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.09.017. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
8
Low-voltage shock impedance measurements: A false sense of security.低电压冲击阻抗测量：一种虚假的安全感。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Jan;44(1):93-100. doi: 10.1111/pace.14117. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
9
Riata silicone defibrillation lead with normal electrical measures at routine ambulatory check: The role of high-voltage shock testing.在常规动态检查中电参数正常的Riata硅胶除颤导线：高压电击测试的作用
World J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 26;8(11):657-666. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i11.657.
10
High defibrillation threshold with a subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator due to the lead having been positioned in the fat layer.皮下植入式心脏除颤器出现高除颤阈值，原因是导线放置在了脂肪层。
J Arrhythm. 2018 Feb 8;34(2):198-200. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12033. eCollection 2018 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Can lead damage be ruled out using defibrillation threshold testing in patients with very high-impedance shock leads?对于具有非常高阻抗休克导联的患者，能否通过除颤阈值测试排除导联损伤？
J Arrhythm. 2025 Feb 12;41(1):e70014. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70014. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Normalization of increasing shocking coil impedance with full output synchronized shock.全输出同步电击时递增性电击线圈阻抗的正常化。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;35(11):2251-2253. doi: 10.1111/jce.16416. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Systematic Review of Defibrillation Threshold Testing at De Novo Implantation.首次植入时除颤阈值测试的系统评价
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003357. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003357.