Jiang Qi, Wu Xi, Dong Fangyu, Qiao Shan, Shi Qiaoyun, Jian Changyong, Chen Chen, Zhou Jiuyue, Wang Youchun, Huang Weijin
Division of HIV/AIDS and Sex-transmitted Virus Vaccines, Institute for Biological Product Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (NIFDC), State Key Laboratory of Drug Regulatory Science, Beijing 102629, China.
Department of Research & Development, Taibang Biologic Group, Beijing 100125, China.
Biosaf Health. 2024 Sep 3;6(5):279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2024.09.002. eCollection 2024 Oct.
In order to clarify the pre-exist immunity background of different human coronaviruses (HCoV), this study investigated the positive rate of spike (S) protein antibodies of HCoV, including HCoV- severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) -associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43, before and after the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. We utilized pseudotyped virus-based neutralization assays (PBNA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to detect antibody levels against HCoV in serum samples collected in 2009-2010 and 2023. The PBNA results showed that neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-1 and the MERS-CoV were negative. In the serum samples from 2009 to 2010, neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (D614G) were negative, whereas in the serum samples from 2023, 73 samples (73 %) showed neutralizing reactions with the SARS-CoV-2 D614G strain, 96 samples (96 %) with the BA.5 strain, and 91 samples (91 %) with the BF.7 strain. Among pre-COVID-19 samples, 33 % (33/100) showed neutralizing reactions with HCoV-229E and 63 % (63/100) with HCoV-NL63. Among post-COVID-19 samples, 50 % (50/100) showed neutralizing reactions with HCoV-229E and 49 % (49/100) with HCoV-NL63. Due to the different receptors of alpha coronavirus genus compared to other beta coronavirus genus, neutralizing antibodies against HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 virus cannot be detected by constructing corresponding pseudotyped virus. Binding antibodies against HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 virus were detected using ELISA. The results revealed that among pre-COVID-19 samples, 83 % (83/100) and 45 % (45/100) had binding activity with HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1, respectively. Among post-COVID-19 samples, 100 % (100/100) and 81 % (81/100) had binding activity with HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1, respectively.
为了阐明不同人类冠状病毒(HCoV)的既往免疫背景,本研究调查了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情前后HCoV的刺突(S)蛋白抗体阳性率,包括严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)相关冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-1)、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)、中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)、HCoV-229E、HCoV-NL63、HCoV-HKU1和HCoV-OC43。我们利用基于假型病毒的中和试验(PBNA)或酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测2009 - 2010年和2023年采集的血清样本中针对HCoV的抗体水平。PBNA结果显示,针对SARS-CoV-1和MERS-CoV的中和抗体为阴性。在2009年至2010年的血清样本中,针对SARS-CoV-2(D614G)的中和抗体为阴性,而在2023年的血清样本中,73份样本(73%)对SARS-CoV-2 D614G毒株呈现中和反应,96份样本(96%)对BA.5毒株呈现中和反应,91份样本(91%)对BF.7毒株呈现中和反应。在COVID-19之前的样本中,33%(33/100)对HCoV-229E呈现中和反应,63%(63/100)对HCoV-NL63呈现中和反应。在COVID-19之后的样本中,50%(50/100)对HCoV-229E呈现中和反应,49%(49/100)对HCoV-NL63呈现中和反应。由于α冠状病毒属与其他β冠状病毒属的受体不同,通过构建相应的假型病毒无法检测到针对HCoV-OC43和HCoV-HKU1病毒的中和抗体。使用ELISA检测针对HCoV-OC43和HCoV-HKU1病毒的结合抗体。结果显示,在COVID-19之前的样本中,分别有83%(83/100)和45%(45/100)与HCoV-OC43和HCoV-HKU1具有结合活性。在COVID-19之后的样本中,分别有100%(100/100)和81%(81/100)与HCoV-OC43和HCoV-HKU1具有结合活性。