Melo Xavier, Lopes Adma, Coelho Raquel, Simão Bruno, Oliveira Isabel, Marôco João L, Laranjo Sérgio, Fernhall Bo, Santa-Clara Helena
Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, Caparica, Almada, Portugal.
Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana - Universidade de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 13;20(3):e0319130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319130. eCollection 2025.
Arterial stiffness and cardiac autonomic function are crucial indicators of cardiovascular health. Acute exercise and age impact these parameters, but research often focuses on specific exercise activities, lacking ecological validity.
We examined the acute effects of commercially available group fitness classes (indoor cycling, resistance training, combined exercise) on arterial stiffness and vagal-related heart rate variability (HRV) indices in twelve young and twelve middle-aged adults. Participants attended four sessions, including exercise and control conditions, with measurements taken at rest and during recovery.
Middle-aged, but not young adults, showed reductions in central and peripheral systolic blood pressure 20-min into recovery across all exercise modalities (range: -7 to -8 mmHg p < 0.05). However, arterial stiffness remained unchanged. Similarly, vagal-related HRV indices (range: -0.51 to -0.90 ms, p < 0.05) and BRS (-4.03, p < 0.05) were reduced immediately after exercise, with differences persisting 30 min into recovery only after indoor cycling. Resistance and combined exercise elicited similar cardiovagal modulation and delayed baroreflex sensitivity recovery to cycling exercise, despite higher energy expenditure during indoor cycling (+87 to +129 kcal, p < 0.05).
Acute group fitness classes induce age-dependent alterations in blood pressure, but not in arterial stiffness or cardiovagal modulation. While the overall cardiovascular effects were generally consistent, differences in autonomic recovery were observed between exercise modes, with prolonged effects seen after indoor cycling. This suggests that exercise prescription should consider both age and exercise modality, as well as recovery time. The findings also emphasize the importance of ecological validity in exercise interventions, highlighting that acute effects on cardiovascular health in real-world settings may differ from those observed in controlled laboratory environments (ID: NCT06616428).
动脉僵硬度和心脏自主神经功能是心血管健康的关键指标。急性运动和年龄会影响这些参数,但研究通常集中在特定的运动活动上,缺乏生态学效度。
我们研究了市售团体健身课程(室内骑行、阻力训练、综合运动)对12名年轻人和12名中年成年人的动脉僵硬度和迷走神经相关心率变异性(HRV)指标的急性影响。参与者参加了四个环节,包括运动和对照条件,在休息时和恢复期间进行测量。
中年成年人(而非年轻人)在所有运动方式恢复20分钟时,中心和外周收缩压均有所降低(范围:-7至-8 mmHg,p < 0.05)。然而,动脉僵硬度保持不变。同样,迷走神经相关的HRV指标(范围:-0.51至-0.90 ms,p < 0.05)和压力反射敏感性(-4.03,p < 0.05)在运动后立即降低,仅在室内骑行后恢复30分钟时差异仍然存在。阻力训练和综合运动引起了相似的心脏迷走神经调节,并使压力反射敏感性恢复延迟至与骑行运动相当的水平,尽管室内骑行期间能量消耗更高(+87至+129千卡,p < 0.05)。
急性团体健身课程会引起血压的年龄依赖性变化,但不会引起动脉僵硬度或心脏迷走神经调节的变化。虽然总体心血管效应通常是一致的,但在运动模式之间观察到自主神经恢复存在差异,室内骑行后出现了延长效应。这表明运动处方应考虑年龄、运动方式以及恢复时间。研究结果还强调了运动干预中生态学效度的重要性,突出了现实环境中对心血管健康的急性影响可能与在受控实验室环境中观察到的不同(标识符:NCT06616428)。