Huff Nathan R, Arnold David H, Isbell Linda M
Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
J Community Psychol. 2025 Feb;53(2):e70005. doi: 10.1002/jcop.70005.
The community attitudes towards mental illness scale (CAMI) is widely used to measure authoritarianism, benevolence, social restrictiveness, and community mental health attitudes held by general populations and medical professionals. This study compares the fit of published alternative factor structures of the CAMI to a general population English-speaking sample and examines what mental illnesses individuals think about when responding. Using data from 749 US MTurk participants, confirmatory factor analysis supported a modified version of Morris' (2012) structure - fear/exclusion, social control, and goodwill - χ(183) = 1094.44, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.08, CFI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.06. Most participants (73.6%) considered specific mental illnesses, with bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia most common. Some found challenges defining mental illness. Comparing structures of a widely cited tool and identifying what respondents think about while completing the scale assists the many researchers using the CAMI. This clarifies our understanding of community stigma and improves our capacity to reduce it.
社区对精神疾病的态度量表(CAMI)被广泛用于衡量普通人群和医学专业人员所持有的威权主义、仁爱、社会限制和社区心理健康态度。本研究比较了已发表的CAMI替代因素结构与以英语为母语的普通人群样本的拟合度,并考察了个体在回答时所想到的精神疾病。使用来自749名美国亚马逊土耳其机器人平台参与者的数据,验证性因素分析支持了莫里斯(2012年)结构的一个修改版本——恐惧/排斥、社会控制和善意——χ(183)=1094.44,p<0.001,RMSEA=0.08,CFI=0.90,SRMR=0.06。大多数参与者(73.6%)考虑的是特定的精神疾病,其中双相情感障碍、抑郁症和精神分裂症最为常见。一些人发现定义精神疾病存在挑战。比较一个被广泛引用的工具的结构,并确定受访者在完成量表时的想法,有助于众多使用CAMI的研究人员。这澄清了我们对社区污名的理解,并提高了我们减少污名的能力。