Bivona Umberto, Villalobos Dolores
Fondazione Santa Lucia, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Department of Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Center for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Institute of Knowledge Technology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
Neuropsychologia. 2025 Jul 29;214:109123. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109123. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
Impairment in self-awareness (ISA) is an important obstacle in neurorehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury (ABI) patients since it can cause failure in adopting adequate compensatory strategies, or the implementation of ineffective or dangerous behaviors. Accordingly, it should be assessed as early and accurately as possible, even if, to date, no consensus exists on how best to measure SA, and on its explanatory models. The present systematic review aimed to address: (a) to which extent ISA has been assessed in studies enrolling severe ABI patients; (b) whether studies on assessment of SA after severe ABI considered any explanatory models of SA and which measures have been utilized accordingly; (c) possible gaps or criticism in the extant research on severe ABI patients; and (d) to provide a novel proposal for SA assessment/classification based on the results and discussion from the systematic review conducted in this well selected population of patients. A systematic review was carried out in the databases PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO; 701 studies were retrieved and finally 54 met the inclusion criteria. Our review evidenced the paucity of studies on assessment of SA in patients with severe ABI that specified the model and the level of SA. Only a few measures of SA went beyond its intellectual and declarative aspects, thus hindering an exhaustive assessment and a full comprehension of SA. Accordingly, we propose a more comprehensive classification of offline anticipatory SA, with some important implications in the neurorehabilitation field. The review demonstrated the need of measuring SA beyond its declarative level, differentiating between declarative and real anticipatory SA, as well as of assessing SA at both offline and online levels.
自我意识受损(ISA)是重度获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者神经康复中的一个重要障碍,因为它可能导致患者无法采用适当的代偿策略,或实施无效或危险的行为。因此,即使到目前为止,对于如何最好地测量自我意识以及其解释模型尚无共识,也应尽早且准确地对其进行评估。本系统综述旨在解决以下问题:(a)在纳入重度ABI患者的研究中,自我意识受损在多大程度上得到了评估;(b)重度ABI后自我意识评估的研究是否考虑了自我意识的任何解释模型,以及相应地使用了哪些测量方法;(c)现有重度ABI患者研究中可能存在的差距或批评;(d)根据对这一精心挑选的患者群体进行的系统综述的结果和讨论,为自我意识评估/分类提供新的建议。我们在PubMed、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库中进行了系统综述;共检索到701项研究,最终54项符合纳入标准。我们的综述表明,在重度ABI患者中,明确自我意识模型和水平的自我意识评估研究较少。只有少数自我意识测量方法超越了其智力和陈述性方面,因此阻碍了对自我意识的详尽评估和全面理解。因此,我们提出了一种更全面的离线预期自我意识分类方法,这在神经康复领域具有一些重要意义。该综述表明,需要超越陈述性水平来测量自我意识,区分陈述性和真正的预期自我意识,以及在离线和在线水平上评估自我意识。