• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision Increase After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions Subsequent to Primary TKA.

作者信息

Niknam Kian, Lezak Bradley A, Mercer Nathaniel P, Robin Joseph X, Hansen Erik, Lansdown Drew, Schwarzkopf Ran

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

NYU Langone Orthopedics, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 May 21;107(10):e49. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00929. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.24.00929
PMID:40096285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and may benefit from arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) to improve range of motion and decrease pain. However, the rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and of the need for future revision TKA (rTKA) have only been studied in a limited capacity in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare PJI and revision outcomes in patients who had undergone TKA between those who subsequently underwent arthroscopic LOA and those who did not undergo arthroscopic LOA.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was utilized to identify patients who had undergone primary TKA between 2016 and 2021. ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) and CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes were then used to identify patients who underwent LOA for arthrofibrosis. The rates of PJI and rTKA were compared between patients who did and did not undergo LOA. Multivariable logistic and Cox regressions, controlling for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tobacco use, and a body mass index of >30 kg/m 2 , were performed to compare the rates of PJI and revision between the LOA and no-LOA groups.

RESULTS

A total of 383,143 patients were identified, of whom 703 had undergone arthroscopic LOA. Patients who underwent LOA had higher overall rates of PJI (2.7% versus 1.3%; p = 0.001) and all-cause revision (9.8% versus 1.8%; p < 0.001) than those who did not. Patients who underwent LOA had significantly higher odds of PJI (odds ratio [OR], 2.00; p < 0.014), aseptic loosening-related revision (OR, 3.31; p = 0.002), and all-cause revision (OR, 5.32; p < 0.001) within 1 year after the initial TKA. There was no significant difference in 1-year PJI-related revisions between the groups (OR, 1.71; p = 0.193). In a time-to-event analysis, patients undergoing LOA had significantly higher risks of PJI (p = 0.003) and all-cause revision (p = 0.001) but not PJI-related revision (p = 0.322) or aseptic loosening-related revision (p = 0.111).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic LOA after primary TKA was associated with higher rates of PJI and subsequent revision surgery. Surgeons should consider the results of these studies when counseling patients on the importance of early rehabilitation and improving modifiable risk factors after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

相似文献

1
Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Revision Increase After Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions Subsequent to Primary TKA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 May 21;107(10):e49. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00929. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Comparison of outcomes and revision free survival of early arthrofibrosis management after total knee replacement: a national cohort analysis.全膝关节置换术后早期关节纤维化处理的结局及无翻修生存率比较:一项全国队列分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 21;35(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04245-0.
3
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
4
Patients Who Undergo Early Aseptic Revision TKA Within 90 Days of Surgery Have a High Risk of Re-revision and Infection at 2 Years: A Large-database Study.术后 90 天内行早期无菌性翻修 TKA 的患者在 2 年内有很高的再翻修和感染风险:一项大型数据库研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):495-503. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001985.
5
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions.关节置换翻修术治疗假体周围关节感染的术后发病率和死亡率相对高于非感染性翻修术。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):521-526. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
A Decade of Experience With Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions for Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后关节镜下粘连松解治疗关节纤维化十年经验
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Oct;40(10):2525-2530. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.05.017. Epub 2025 May 9.
7
Comparison of Revision Risk Based on Timing of Knee Arthroscopy Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty.膝关节镜检查与全膝关节置换术之间时间间隔对翻修风险的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Apr 21;103(8):660-667. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00218.
8
Postoperative Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use is Associated With Decreased Rates of Manipulation Under Anesthesia, Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions, and Prosthesis-Related Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.术后血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的使用与全膝关节置换术后患者麻醉下手法松解、关节粘连松解和假体相关并发症的发生率降低有关。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr;39(4):954-959.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.015. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
9
Lysis of Adhesion for Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Risk of Subsequent Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后关节纤维性僵直松解与后续再次行全膝关节置换术的风险增加相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):339-344.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后早期无菌翻修手术会增加人工关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3661-3667. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.089. Epub 2020 Jul 3.