Sanghvi Parshva A, Xu Crystal, Baker Jumaa, Hecht Christian, Kamath Atul F
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, USA.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 21;35(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04245-0.
This study examined three common treatment options for arthrofibrosis treatment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)-manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA), and revision TKA (rTKA)-and evaluated differences in medical outcomes, orthopedic outcomes, and revision free survivorship.
The TriNetX platform was queried to identify patients with arthrofibrosis after TKA. Cohorts were stratified by treatment and matched based on demographics and comorbidities. Differences in short-term medical complications, long-term orthopedic complications, and revision free survivorship were assessed. Odds ratios were used to compare outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to determine survivorship.
30,142 patients were identified with arthrofibrosis after TKA (3.61%). Within one year of diagnoses, 3,617 patients were treated with MUA, 2,022 with rTKA, 489 with LOA, and 635 patients with rTKA after MUA/LOA. At 90 days, rTKA had a higher risk of acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, wound dehiscence, emergency department visits, and readmission compared to MUA, and lower risk of readmission compared to patients with prior MUA/LOA (P < 0.05). At 2 years, rTKA had a higher risk of periprosthetic fracture, prosthetic dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, and aseptic loosening compared to MUA but a lower risk of prosthetic dislocation and periprosthetic joint infection compared to patients with prior MUA/LOA (P < 0.05). Survivorship with rTKA was markedly lower than with MUA at 2-and 10-years but was comparable with prior MUA/LOA.
This study found that manipulation under anesthesia may be preferred as the first-line treatment in the management of early postoperative arthrofibrosis over rTKA due to decreased short-term and long-term complication risk and increased survival rate.
本研究探讨了全膝关节置换术(TKA)后关节纤维化的三种常见治疗方案——麻醉下手法松解(MUA)、关节镜下粘连松解(LOA)和翻修TKA(rTKA),并评估了医学结局、骨科结局和无翻修生存率的差异。
通过查询TriNetX平台来识别TKA后发生关节纤维化的患者。根据治疗方式对队列进行分层,并根据人口统计学和合并症进行匹配。评估短期医学并发症、长期骨科并发症和无翻修生存率的差异。使用优势比来比较结局,并进行Kaplan-Meier分析以确定生存率。
共识别出30142例TKA后发生关节纤维化的患者(3.61%)。在诊断后的一年内,3617例患者接受了MUA治疗,2022例接受了rTKA治疗,489例接受了LOA治疗,635例患者在MUA/LOA后接受了rTKA治疗。在90天时,与MUA相比,rTKA发生急性肾损伤、肺栓塞、伤口裂开、急诊就诊和再入院的风险更高,与先前接受MUA/LOA的患者相比,再入院风险更低(P<0.05)。在2年时,与MUA相比,rTKA发生假体周围骨折、假体脱位、假体周围关节感染和无菌性松动的风险更高,但与先前接受MUA/LOA的患者相比,假体脱位和假体周围关节感染的风险更低(P<0.05)。rTKA在2年和10年时的生存率明显低于MUA,但与先前的MUA/LOA相当。
本研究发现,由于短期和长期并发症风险降低以及生存率提高,在术后早期关节纤维化的管理中,麻醉下手法松解可能比rTKA更适合作为一线治疗方法。