• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合粒化高炉矿渣粉(GGBS)和硅灰对地质聚合物混凝土力学性能的影响。

Effect of blending GGBS and silica fume on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete.

作者信息

Zuaiter Mohammad, Khalil Ahmed, Elkafrawy Mohamed, Hawileh Rami, AlHamaydeh Mohammad, Ayman Ahmed, Kim Tae-Yeon

机构信息

Civil and Environmental Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, UAE.

Advanced Digital & Additive Manufacturing Group, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 12778F8, UAE.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93637-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-93637-7
PMID:40097572
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11914085/
Abstract

This study investigates the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete made with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and silica fume (SF) as binders. The influence of varying binder proportions and sodium silicate-to-sodium hydroxide (SS-to-SH) ratios of 1.5 and 2.0 in the alkali-activated solution was examined. Experimental tests evaluated slump, compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and splitting tensile strength at 1, 7, and 28 days. Increasing SF content up to 50% in the binder with a solution ratio of 1.5 improved the 28-day compressive strength by 50% compared to mixes made solely with slag. However, further increase in SF reduced splitting tensile strength and compressive strength by 79 and 56%, respectively, at 28 days. Increasing the solution ratio from 1.5 to 2.0 enhanced compressive strength for slag-dominant mixes by up to 63% but reduced strength for SF-rich mixes by up to 87%. The highest modulus of elasticity, 18.7 GPa, was achieved with slag-only binders and a solution ratio of 2.0, marking a 240% increase over its counterpart mix with a lower solution ratio. Equal GGBS and SF blends improved splitting tensile strength compared to SF-rich mixes but were surpassed by GGBS-rich mixes in terms of overall structural performance.

摘要

本研究调查了以磨细粒化高炉矿渣(GGBS)和硅灰(SF)作为胶凝材料制成的地质聚合物混凝土的力学性能。研究了不同胶凝材料比例以及碱激发溶液中硅酸钠与氢氧化钠(SS-to-SH)比例为1.5和2.0时的影响。通过实验测试评估了1天、7天和28天时的坍落度、抗压强度、弹性模量和劈裂抗拉强度。当溶液比例为1.5时,胶凝材料中SF含量增加至50%,与仅用矿渣制成的混合料相比,28天抗压强度提高了50%。然而,在28天时,SF含量进一步增加分别使劈裂抗拉强度和抗压强度降低了79%和56%。溶液比例从1.5增加到2.0,对于以矿渣为主的混合料,抗压强度提高了63%,但对于富含SF的混合料,强度降低了87%。仅用矿渣作为胶凝材料且溶液比例为2.0时,弹性模量最高,达到18.7 GPa,相较于溶液比例较低的对应混合料,提高了240%。与富含SF的混合料相比,GGBS和SF等量混合提高了劈裂抗拉强度,但在整体结构性能方面,被富含GGBS的混合料超越。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/ab9750457ac0/41598_2025_93637_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/1e22f85c28ed/41598_2025_93637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/1c99a48afa09/41598_2025_93637_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/da02c3aa0f95/41598_2025_93637_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/aac142f989bc/41598_2025_93637_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/daf946120767/41598_2025_93637_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/999cab77f0b7/41598_2025_93637_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/4da2d0be0dac/41598_2025_93637_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/0d6bc79d9474/41598_2025_93637_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/17399fe5feef/41598_2025_93637_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/bbe1bb098847/41598_2025_93637_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/9efe97bcbe1b/41598_2025_93637_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/1d22893023a7/41598_2025_93637_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/86b017cfd647/41598_2025_93637_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/5c1bca6c422f/41598_2025_93637_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/e6c3411786d3/41598_2025_93637_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/14fa289d8c66/41598_2025_93637_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/6deb856d8b8f/41598_2025_93637_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/98072ac27dbc/41598_2025_93637_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/ab9750457ac0/41598_2025_93637_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/1e22f85c28ed/41598_2025_93637_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/1c99a48afa09/41598_2025_93637_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/da02c3aa0f95/41598_2025_93637_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/aac142f989bc/41598_2025_93637_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/daf946120767/41598_2025_93637_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/999cab77f0b7/41598_2025_93637_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/4da2d0be0dac/41598_2025_93637_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/0d6bc79d9474/41598_2025_93637_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/17399fe5feef/41598_2025_93637_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/bbe1bb098847/41598_2025_93637_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/9efe97bcbe1b/41598_2025_93637_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/1d22893023a7/41598_2025_93637_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/86b017cfd647/41598_2025_93637_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/5c1bca6c422f/41598_2025_93637_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/e6c3411786d3/41598_2025_93637_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/14fa289d8c66/41598_2025_93637_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/6deb856d8b8f/41598_2025_93637_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/98072ac27dbc/41598_2025_93637_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42ac/11914085/ab9750457ac0/41598_2025_93637_Fig19_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of blending GGBS and silica fume on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete.混合粒化高炉矿渣粉(GGBS)和硅灰对地质聚合物混凝土力学性能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93637-7.
2
Physico-Mechanical Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Activated by Sodium Hydroxide and Silica Fume-Synthesised Sodium Silicate Solution.氢氧化钠与硅灰合成硅酸钠溶液激发的地质聚合物混凝土的物理力学性能评估
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 17;16(6):2400. doi: 10.3390/ma16062400.
3
Utilization of a PFA-GGBS-Based Precursor in Geopolymer Concrete Production as a Sustainable Substitute for Conventional Concrete.在地质聚合物混凝土生产中使用基于偏高岭土-粒化高炉矿渣的前驱体作为传统混凝土的可持续替代品。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 16;18(6):1309. doi: 10.3390/ma18061309.
4
Soft computing models to predict the compressive strength of GGBS/FA- geopolymer concrete.软计算模型预测 GGBS/FA-地聚合物混凝土的抗压强度。
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0265846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265846. eCollection 2022.
5
Understanding the Effect of Waiting for the Dissolution of Sodium Hydroxide in Geopolymer Concrete Mixes.了解在地质聚合物混凝土混合料中等待氢氧化钠溶解的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Feb 15;18(4):849. doi: 10.3390/ma18040849.
6
Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Quick-Strength Geopolymer Material Considering Preheated-to-Room Temperature Ratio of Sand, NaSiO-to-NaOH Ratio, and Fly Ash-to-GGBS Ratio.考虑砂的预热至室温比、硅酸钠与氢氧化钠比以及粉煤灰与粒化高炉矿渣比的快硬地质聚合物材料力学性能研究
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1084. doi: 10.3390/polym15051084.
7
Development of a High Strength Geopolymer Incorporating Quarry Waste Diabase Mud (DM) and Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag (GGBS).一种包含采石场废料辉绿岩泥浆(DM)和粒化高炉矿渣(GGBS)的高强度地质聚合物的开发。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 28;15(17):5946. doi: 10.3390/ma15175946.
8
Strength, durability, and economic analysis of GGBS-based geopolymer concrete with silica fume under harsh conditions.在恶劣条件下基于粒化高炉矿渣粉的硅灰地质聚合物混凝土的强度、耐久性及经济分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77801-z.
9
Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization of Quarry Rock Dust Incorporated Steel Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete and Residual Properties after Exposure to Elevated Temperatures.掺入采石场岩粉的钢纤维增强地质聚合物混凝土的力学和微观结构表征以及高温暴露后的残余性能
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;14(22):6890. doi: 10.3390/ma14226890.
10
Mechanical Properties of a Sustainable Low-Carbon Geopolymer Concrete Using a Pumice-Derived Sodium Silicate Solution.使用浮石衍生硅酸钠溶液的可持续低碳地质聚合物混凝土的力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 13;17(8):1792. doi: 10.3390/ma17081792.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes.钙化合物对粉煤灰地质聚合物浆体力学性能的影响。
J Hazard Mater. 2009 Aug 15;167(1-3):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.121. Epub 2009 Jan 7.