Suppr超能文献

患者解救与转运过程中使用的颈椎固定方法比较。

A comparison of methods of cervical immobilization used in patient extrication and transport.

作者信息

Cline J R, Scheidel E, Bigsby E F

出版信息

J Trauma. 1985 Jul;25(7):649-53. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198507000-00013.

Abstract

We radiographically studied the efficacy of seven methods of cervical immobilization used in the prehospital setting. The methods were: Philadelphia collar, Hare extrication collar, rigid plastic collar, Philadelphia collar + short board, Hare extrication collar + short board, rigid plastic collar + short board, and the short board used alone. Ninety-seven normal volunteers were randomized to one of these seven methods and each volunteer served as his or her own control. Efficacy was expressed as per cent reduction of baseline movement in the sagittal, frontal, and horizontal planes. The short-board technique appeared to be superior to all the three collars studied. The collars provided no augmentation of immobilization over that provided by the short board alone. We believe that the short-board technique described herein, which is commonly used in the prehospital setting, can be used as the standard of comparison against which newer prehospital devices can be objectively compared.

摘要

我们通过影像学研究了七种用于院前急救的颈椎固定方法的效果。这些方法分别是:费城颈托、哈尔急救颈托、硬质塑料颈托、费城颈托 + 短板、哈尔急救颈托 + 短板、硬质塑料颈托 + 短板以及单独使用短板。97名正常志愿者被随机分配至这七种方法中的一种,且每名志愿者均作为自身对照。效果以矢状面、额状面和水平面基线活动减少的百分比来表示。短板技术似乎优于所研究的所有三种颈托。这些颈托在固定效果上并未比单独使用短板时有所增强。我们认为,本文所述的短板技术,这种在院前急救环境中常用的技术,可作为一种比较标准,据此能客观地比较新型院前急救设备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验