Simonsen Emma, Lund Lars Christian, Ernst Martin Thomsen, Hjellvik Vidar, Hegedüs Laszlo, Hamann Steffen, Jørstad Øystein Kalsnes, Gulseth Hanne Løvdal, Karlstad Øystein, Pottegård Anton
Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun;27(6):3094-3103. doi: 10.1111/dom.16316. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
To investigate the putative association between semaglutide and non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION).
Data from national health registries in Denmark (2018-2024) and Norway (2018-2022) were used to compare NAION risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes initiating semaglutide versus sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is). A supplementary self-controlled analysis examined NAION risk among all semaglutide users. National estimates were pooled using a fixed-effects model.
We identified 44 517 users of semaglutide for the management of type 2 diabetes in Denmark and 16 860 in Norway, with a total of 32 NAION events observed. The unadjusted incidence rate of NAION was 2.19/10 000 person-years among Danish semaglutide initiators, compared to 1.18 among SGLT-2i initiators. In Norway, the corresponding rates were 2.90 and 0.92, respectively. After adjustment, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) was 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-4.75), and the incidence rate difference (IRD) was +1.41 (95% CI +0.53 to +2.29) per 10 000 person-years. Estimates were consistent across both countries but higher and less precise in Norway (HR 7.25; 95% CI 2.34-22.4) compared to Denmark (HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.20-3.92). Results remained consistent across sensitivity and supplementary analyses, with a stronger association observed in a post hoc per-protocol analysis (HR 6.35; 95% CI 2.88-14.0). In the supplementary self-controlled study, symmetry ratios (SRs) for NAION were 1.14 (95% CI 0.55-2.36) in Denmark and 2.67 (95% CI 0.91-8.99) in Norway.
The use of semaglutide for managing type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of NAION compared with the use of SGLT-2is. However, the absolute risk remains low.
研究司美格鲁肽与非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变(NAION)之间可能存在的关联。
利用丹麦(2018 - 2024年)和挪威(2018 - 2022年)国家健康登记处的数据,比较开始使用司美格鲁肽的2型糖尿病患者与使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT - 2i)的患者发生NAION的风险。一项补充性自我对照分析考察了所有司美格鲁肽使用者发生NAION的风险。使用固定效应模型汇总各国的估计值。
我们确定丹麦有44517名使用司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病的患者,挪威有16860名,共观察到32例NAION事件。丹麦开始使用司美格鲁肽的患者中,NAION的未调整发病率为2.19/10000人年,而开始使用SGLT - 2i的患者为1.18/10000人年。在挪威,相应的发病率分别为2.90和0.92。调整后,汇总风险比(HR)为2.81(95%置信区间[CI]1.67 - 4.75),每10000人年的发病率差异(IRD)为 +1.41(95% CI +0.53至 +2.29)。两国的估计结果一致,但挪威(HR 7.25;95% CI 2.34 - 22.4)的结果比丹麦(HR 2.17;95% CI 1.20 - 3.92)更高且精度更低。敏感性分析和补充分析的结果保持一致,在事后符合方案分析中观察到更强的关联(HR 6.35;95% CI 2.88 - 14.0)。在补充性自我对照研究中,丹麦NAION的对称比(SR)为1.14(95% CI 0.55 - 2.36),挪威为2.67(95% CI 0.91 - 8.99)。
与使用SGLT - 2i相比,使用司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病与NAION风险增加相关。然而,绝对风险仍然较低。