Suppr超能文献

针对智障人士的九项个人健康问卷(PHQ - 9)、七项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD - 7)以及工作与社会适应量表(WSAS)的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Nine-Item Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Seven-Item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) With People With Intellectual Disabilities.

作者信息

Dagnan Dave, Saunders Rob, Stott Joshua, Thwaites Richard, Hatton Chris

机构信息

Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Workington, UK.

CORE Data Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Jun;69(6):502-509. doi: 10.1111/jir.13231. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nine-item Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) are, respectively, self-report measures of depression, generalised anxiety, and the impact of mental health on the person's personal functioning that are widely used in mainstream mental health services in England. The psychometric properties of these scales when used with people with intellectual disabilities have not been established.

METHOD

Item level data for the PHQ-9 (n = 128), GAD-7 (n = 124) and WSAS (n = 133) for people with intellectual disabilities in an English NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (NHSTT) service in the north of England were analysed using internal reliability statistics and confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, the full PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WSAS have Cronbach's α of 0.81, 0.84 and 0.81, respectively, and have acceptable ranges of corrected item-total correlations. The two-factor structures for the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 were a better fit than single-factor structures, although the single-factor fit and the correlation between the two factors within each scale suggest that their use as a single scale is justified. The single-factor structure for the WSAS was a good fit.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the widely used PHQ-9, GAD-7 and WSAS demonstrate internal consistency values and factor analysis structure similar to those for individuals without intellectual disabilities. The data support the use of these measures for people with intellectual disabilities attending routine primary care mental health services.

摘要

背景

九项版身体健康问卷(PHQ - 9)、七项版广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD - 7)以及工作与社会适应量表(WSAS)分别是用于自我报告抑郁、广泛性焦虑以及心理健康对个人功能影响的工具,在英格兰的主流心理健康服务中被广泛使用。这些量表在用于智障人士时的心理测量特性尚未确定。

方法

对英格兰北部国民健康服务体系(NHS)的一项针对焦虑和抑郁的谈话治疗服务(NHSTT)中智障人士的PHQ - 9(n = 128)、GAD - 7(n = 124)和WSAS(n = 133)的项目级数据进行了内部信度统计分析和验证性因素分析。

结果

在本研究中,完整的PHQ - 9、GAD - 7和WSAS的克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's α)分别为0.81、0.84和0.81,且校正后的项目 - 总分相关性在可接受范围内。PHQ - 9和GAD - 7的双因素结构比单因素结构拟合度更好,尽管单因素拟合以及各量表内两个因素之间的相关性表明将它们用作单一量表是合理的。WSAS的单因素结构拟合良好。

结论

在本研究中,广泛使用的PHQ - 9、GAD - 7和WSAS所展示的内部一致性值和因素分析结构与非智障个体相似。这些数据支持将这些测量工具用于接受常规初级保健心理健康服务的智障人士。

相似文献

2
The work and social adjustment scale: reliability, sensitivity and value.工作和社会调整量表:信度、敏感性和效度。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;18(2):131-8. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2014.894072. Epub 2014 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

9
PHQ-9: One factor or two?PHQ-9:一个因素还是两个?
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:532-534. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验