Hai Tao, Wu Wanchun, Ren Kexin, Li Na, Zou Liqun
Division of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 3;15:1507418. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1507418. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to explore the efficacy of chidamide-containing regimens as maintenance therapy in patients with T- and natural killer (NK)-cell lymphomas (TNKLs).
A total of 51 patients with TNKLs who received chidamide-containing regimens after induction therapy were enrolled. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary end point was overall survival (OS) and safety.
The median duration of maintenance was 14 months (range = 1-24 months). Most of the patients were diagnosed with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL; 24/51, 47.1%), followed by angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL; 14/51, 27.5%). The median PFS and OS were 21 and 29 months, respectively. The 2-year PFS and OS among the overall population were 45.1% and 54.2%, respectively. Patients who experienced complete remission (CR) after induction therapy had favorable survival compared with non-CR patients (partial remission/stable disease, PR/SD). Patients who experienced CR after first-line induction treatment also had favorable survival, but similar significance was not observed in the salvage treatment group. Although 86.3% of the patients had chidamide-related adverse events (AEs), severe hematological AEs (grade ≥3) occurred in only 11 (21.6%) patients, indicating the safe toxicity profile of chidamide.
The prolonged survival indicated that chidamide-containing maintenance therapy is promising and well tolerated in patients with TNKLs.
本研究旨在探讨含西达本胺方案作为T细胞和自然杀伤(NK)细胞淋巴瘤(TNKLs)患者维持治疗的疗效。
共有51例TNKLs患者在诱导治疗后接受了含西达本胺方案。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点是总生存期(OS)和安全性。
维持治疗的中位持续时间为14个月(范围=1-24个月)。大多数患者被诊断为结外NK/T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTCL;24/51,47.1%),其次是血管免疫母细胞性T细胞淋巴瘤(AITL;14/51,27.5%)。中位PFS和OS分别为21个月和29个月。总体人群的2年PFS和OS分别为45.1%和54.2%。诱导治疗后达到完全缓解(CR)的患者与未达到CR的患者(部分缓解/病情稳定,PR/SD)相比,生存期更佳。一线诱导治疗后达到CR的患者生存期也更佳,但在挽救治疗组中未观察到类似的显著差异。虽然86.3%的患者发生了与西达本胺相关的不良事件(AE),但严重血液学AE(≥3级)仅发生在11例(21.6%)患者中,表明西达本胺的毒性特征安全。
生存期延长表明含西达本胺的维持治疗在TNKLs患者中前景良好且耐受性良好。