Bjekić Jovana, Živanović Marko, Stanković Marija, Paunović Dunja, Konstantinović Uroš, Filipović Saša R
Human Neuroscience Group, Centre for Neuroscience and Neuromodulation, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Institute of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Oct 23;18:1468538. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1468538. eCollection 2024.
Low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), including techniques like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (otDCS), has been widely explored for its neuromodulatory effects on motor, cognitive, and behavioral processes. Despite well-established safety, these techniques can induce varying degrees of discomfort and side effects, potentially impacting their application. This study presents a within-subject sham-controlled experiment directly comparing the subjective experience and side effects of tDCS, tACS, and otDCS. Participants reported their discomfort levels at multiple time points during 20-min stimulation sessions and completed a side-effects questionnaire before and after each session. Results indicated that the overall discomfort levels were low across all conditions, with ≥95% reporting the absence of discomfort or mild procedure-induced discomfort. Nevertheless, tDCS and otDCS were slightly less comfortable compared to sham, especially at the beginning of stimulation, with tACS-induced discomfort levels being overall comparable to sham. The most common side / adverse effects were mild skin sensations, including itching and tingling, particularly with tDCS and otDCS, while tACS occasionally caused phosphenes and blurred vision. These findings provide a systematic comparison of tES-induced discomfort and side effects between different tES techniques, highlighting the high safety of tES, but also the importance of considering within- and between-person variability and time-course effects in tES applications.
低强度经颅电刺激(tES),包括经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、经颅交流电刺激(tACS)和振荡经颅直流电刺激(otDCS)等技术,因其对运动、认知和行为过程的神经调节作用而受到广泛研究。尽管这些技术的安全性已得到充分证实,但它们仍可能引起不同程度的不适和副作用,这可能会影响其应用。本研究进行了一项受试者自身的假刺激对照实验,直接比较了tDCS、tACS和otDCS的主观体验和副作用。参与者在20分钟的刺激过程中的多个时间点报告了他们的不适程度,并在每次刺激前后完成了一份副作用问卷。结果表明,在所有条件下,总体不适程度都较低,≥95%的参与者报告没有不适或仅有轻微的操作引起的不适。然而,与假刺激相比,tDCS和otDCS的舒适度略低,尤其是在刺激开始时,而tACS引起的不适程度总体上与假刺激相当。最常见的副作用是轻微的皮肤感觉,包括瘙痒和刺痛,特别是tDCS和otDCS,而tACS偶尔会引起光幻视和视力模糊。这些发现对不同tES技术引起的不适和副作用进行了系统比较,突出了tES的高安全性,但也强调了在tES应用中考虑个体内和个体间变异性以及时间进程效应的重要性。