Coca Antonio, Borghi Claudio, Stergiou George S, Ly Nelly Francoise, Lee Christopher, Tricotel Aurore, Castelo-Branco Anna, Khan Irfan, Blacher Jacques, Abdel-Moneim Mohamed
School of Health and Life Sciences, Universitat Abat Oliba, CEU Universities, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Medicine, Science and Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
J Hypertens. 2025 Jun 1;43(6):993-1002. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000004002. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
We assessed rates of cardiovascular events, all-cause death, baseline risk factors, and treatment patterns in a population qualifying for initiation of dual combination blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapy. We also evaluated the association between dual versus monotherapy during follow-up and incidence of cardiovascular events.
This study utilized integrated databases in England: Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Office for National Statistics. Individuals aged at least 18 years qualifying for dual therapy were identified during 15-year period (2005-2019). The primary endpoint was composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and cardiovascular death. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death.
Total 1 426 079 individuals met selection criteria. The 15-year event rates for the primary and secondary endpoints were 27.1 and 32.6%, respectively. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes on insulin therapy, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and advanced age were associated with two to four-fold higher risk of primary and secondary endpoints. The estimated hazard ratio for dual versus monotherapy as a time-varying covariate was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.81-0.83) for the primary endpoint. At variance with guidelines, monotherapy was most common treatment pattern over 5-year follow-up.
Baseline characteristics conveying a multifold higher risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause death mostly represented nonmodifiable risk factors. Treatment with dual therapy as compared to monotherapy was associated with reduction in cardiovascular events. Monotherapy remained most common BP-lowering treatment indicating substantial opportunity for risk reduction by treatment intensification.
我们评估了符合开始联合降压治疗条件人群的心血管事件发生率、全因死亡率、基线风险因素和治疗模式。我们还评估了随访期间联合治疗与单药治疗相比与心血管事件发生率之间的关联。
本研究利用了英国的综合数据库:临床实践研究数据链、医院事件统计数据和国家统计局数据。在15年期间(2005 - 2019年)识别出年龄至少18岁且符合联合治疗条件的个体。主要终点为非致命性心肌梗死、非致命性中风、因心力衰竭住院和心血管死亡的复合终点。次要终点为全因死亡。
共有1426079名个体符合入选标准。主要终点和次要终点的15年事件发生率分别为27.1%和26.6%。动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病、接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病、心力衰竭、心房颤动、慢性肾脏病和高龄与主要终点和次要终点的风险高出两到四倍相关。作为时变协变量,联合治疗与单药治疗相比,主要终点的估计风险比为0.82(95%置信区间0.81 - 0.83)。与指南不同的是,在5年随访期间,单药治疗是最常见的治疗模式。
表明心血管事件和全因死亡风险高出数倍的基线特征大多代表不可改变的风险因素。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗与心血管事件减少相关。单药治疗仍然是最常见的降压治疗方式,这表明通过强化治疗有很大的风险降低机会。