Suppr超能文献

降压药物治疗用于不同血压水平的心血管疾病一级和二级预防:一项个体参与者水平数据的荟萃分析。

Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1625-1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00590-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effects of pharmacological blood pressure lowering at normal or high-normal blood pressure ranges in people with or without pre-existing cardiovascular disease remains uncertain. We analysed individual participant data from randomised trials to investigate the effects of blood pressure lowering treatment on the risk of major cardiovascular events by baseline levels of systolic blood pressure.

METHODS

We did a meta-analysis of individual participant-level data from 48 randomised trials of pharmacological blood pressure lowering medications versus placebo or other classes of blood pressure-lowering medications, or between more versus less intensive treatment regimens, which had at least 1000 persons-years of follow-up in each group. Trials exclusively done with participants with heart failure or short-term interventions in participants with acute myocardial infarction or other acute settings were excluded. Data from 51 studies published between 1972 and 2013 were obtained by the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration (Oxford University, Oxford, UK). We pooled the data to investigate the stratified effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment in participants with and without prevalent cardiovascular disease (ie, any reports of stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischaemic heart disease before randomisation), overall and across seven systolic blood pressure categories (ranging from <120 to ≥170 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a major cardiovascular event (defined as a composite of fatal and non-fatal stroke, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease, or heart failure causing death or requiring admission to hospital), analysed as per intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Data for 344 716 participants from 48 randomised clinical trials were available for this analysis. Pre-randomisation mean systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 146/84 mm Hg in participants with previous cardiovascular disease (n=157 728) and 157/89 mm Hg in participants without previous cardiovascular disease (n=186 988). There was substantial spread in participants' blood pressure at baseline, with 31 239 (19·8%) of participants with previous cardiovascular disease and 14 928 (8·0%) of individuals without previous cardiovascular disease having a systolic blood pressure of less than 130 mm Hg. The relative effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment were proportional to the intensity of systolic blood pressure reduction. After a median 4·15 years' follow-up (Q1-Q3 2·97-4·96), 42 324 participants (12·3%) had at least one major cardiovascular event. In participants without previous cardiovascular disease at baseline, the incidence rate for developing a major cardiovascular event per 1000 person-years was 31·9 (95% CI 31·3-32·5) in the comparator group and 25·9 (25·4-26·4) in the intervention group. In participants with previous cardiovascular disease at baseline, the corresponding rates were 39·7 (95% CI 39·0-40·5) and 36·0 (95% CI 35·3-36·7), in the comparator and intervention groups, respectively. Hazard ratios (HR) associated with a reduction of systolic blood pressure by 5 mm Hg for a major cardiovascular event were 0·91, 95% CI 0·89-0·94 for partipants without previous cardiovascular disease and 0·89, 0·86-0·92, for those with previous cardiovascular disease. In stratified analyses, there was no reliable evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effects on major cardiovascular events by baseline cardiovascular disease status or systolic blood pressure categories.

INTERPRETATION

In this large-scale analysis of randomised trials, a 5 mm Hg reduction of systolic blood pressure reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events by about 10%, irrespective of previous diagnoses of cardiovascular disease, and even at normal or high-normal blood pressure values. These findings suggest that a fixed degree of pharmacological blood pressure lowering is similarly effective for primary and secondary prevention of major cardiovascular disease, even at blood pressure levels currently not considered for treatment. Physicians communicating the indication for blood pressure lowering treatment to their patients should emphasise its importance on reducing cardiovascular risk rather than focusing on blood pressure reduction itself.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation, UK National Institute for Health Research, and Oxford Martin School.

摘要

背景

在有或没有先前心血管疾病的人群中,正常或正常高值血压范围内的降压治疗对主要心血管事件风险的影响仍不确定。我们分析了随机试验的个体参与者数据,以研究根据收缩压基线水平,降压治疗对主要心血管事件风险的影响。

方法

我们对来自 48 项降压药物与安慰剂或其他降压药物类别的随机试验的个体参与者水平数据进行了荟萃分析,或者对更强化与较不强化治疗方案之间的差异进行了分析,每组至少有 1000 人年的随访。专门针对心力衰竭患者进行的试验或急性心肌梗死或其他急性情况下的短期干预试验被排除在外。数据来自于 1972 年至 2013 年期间发表的 51 项研究,由牛津大学(英国牛津)降压治疗试验者协作组织获得。我们对数据进行了汇总分析,以研究有或没有先前心血管疾病(即随机分组前有卒中、心肌梗死或缺血性心脏病的任何报告)的参与者中降压治疗的分层效果,以及在七个收缩压类别(范围从<120 至≥170mmHg)中的效果。主要结局是一个主要心血管事件(定义为致死性和非致死性卒中、致死性或非致死性心肌梗死或缺血性心脏病、或导致死亡或需要住院治疗的心衰),按意向治疗进行分析。

结果

48 项随机临床试验中,有 344716 名参与者的数据可用于本分析。有先前心血管疾病的参与者(n=157728)的预随机平均收缩压/舒张压为 146/84mmHg,没有先前心血管疾病的参与者(n=186988)的预随机平均收缩压/舒张压为 157/89mmHg。在基线时,参与者的血压有很大的差异,其中 31239 名(19.8%)有先前心血管疾病的参与者和 14928 名(8.0%)没有先前心血管疾病的参与者的收缩压低于 130mmHg。降压治疗的相对效果与收缩压降低的强度成正比。经过中位数为 4.15 年的随访(Q1-Q3 2.97-4.96),42324 名(12.3%)参与者发生了至少一次主要心血管事件。在基线时没有先前心血管疾病的参与者中,每 1000 人年发生主要心血管事件的发生率为对照组 31.9(95%CI 31.3-32.5),干预组 25.9(25.4-26.4)。在基线时有先前心血管疾病的参与者中,对照组和干预组的相应发生率分别为 39.7(95%CI 39.0-40.5)和 36.0(95%CI 35.3-36.7)。与收缩压降低 5mmHg 相关的主要心血管事件风险比为 0.91,95%CI 0.89-0.94,适用于没有先前心血管疾病的参与者,0.89,95%CI 0.86-0.92,适用于有先前心血管疾病的参与者。在分层分析中,根据基线心血管疾病状况或收缩压类别,治疗效果没有可靠的证据表明存在异质性。

解释

在这项大规模的随机试验分析中,收缩压降低 5mmHg 可使主要心血管事件的风险降低约 10%,无论先前是否有心血管疾病诊断,甚至在正常或正常高值血压范围内也是如此。这些发现表明,固定程度的降压治疗对主要心血管疾病的一级和二级预防同样有效,即使在目前不考虑治疗的血压水平也是如此。向患者传达降压治疗适应证的医生应强调其降低心血管风险的重要性,而不是仅仅关注血压降低本身。

资金来源

英国心脏基金会、英国国家卫生研究院和牛津马丁学院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a641/8102467/a9a72027e9f5/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验