Twumasi Clement, Aktas Mikail, Santoni Nicholas
Nuffield Department of Medicine, Experimental Medicine Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, United Kingdom.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 18;9:e69150. doi: 10.2196/69150.
Recent advancements in rehabilitation sciences have progressively used computational techniques to improve diagnostic and treatment approaches. However, the analysis of high-dimensional, time-dependent data continues to pose a significant problem. Prior research has used clustering techniques on rehabilitation data to identify movement patterns and forecast recovery outcomes. Nonetheless, these initiatives have not yet used force or motion datasets obtained outside a clinical setting, thereby limiting the capacity for therapeutic decisions. Biomechanical data analysis has demonstrated considerable potential in bridging these gaps and improving clinical decision-making in rehabilitation settings.
This study presents a comprehensive clustering analysis of multidimensional movement datasets captured using a novel home exercise device, the "Slider". The aim is to identify clinically relevant movement patterns and provide answers to open research questions for the first time to inform personalized rehabilitation protocols, predict individual recovery trajectories, and assess the risks of potential postoperative complications.
High-dimensional, time-dependent, bilateral knee kinetic datasets were independently analyzed from 32 participants using four unsupervised clustering techniques: k-means, hierarchical clustering, partition around medoids, and CLARA (Clustering Large Applications). The data comprised force, laser-measured distance, and optical tracker coordinates from lower limb activities. The optimal clusters identified through the unsupervised clustering methods were further evaluated and compared using silhouette analysis to quantify their performance. Key determinants of cluster membership were assessed, including demographic factors (eg, gender, BMI, and age) and pain levels, by using a logistic regression model with analysis of covariance adjustment.
Three distinct, time-varying movement patterns or clusters were identified for each knee. Hierarchical clustering performed best for the right knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.637), while CLARA was the most effective for the left knee datasets (with an average silhouette score of 0.598). Key predictors of the movement cluster membership were discovered for both knees. BMI was the most influential determinant of cluster membership for the right knee, where higher BMI decreased the odds of cluster-2 membership (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96; P<.001) but increased the odds for cluster-3 assignment relative to cluster 1 (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P<.001). For the left knee, all predictors of cluster-2 membership were significant (.001≤P≤.008), whereas only BMI (P=.81) could not predict the likelihood of an individual belonging to cluster 3 compared to cluster 1. Gender was the strongest determinant for the left knee, with male participants significantly likely to belong to cluster 3 (OR 3.52, 95% CI 2.91-4.27; P<.001).
These kinetic patterns offer significant insights for creating personalized rehabilitation procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes. These findings underscore the efficacy of unsupervised clustering techniques in the analysis of biomechanical data for clinical rehabilitation applications.
康复科学领域的最新进展已逐渐采用计算技术来改进诊断和治疗方法。然而,对高维、时间相关数据的分析仍然是一个重大问题。先前的研究已在康复数据上使用聚类技术来识别运动模式并预测恢复结果。尽管如此,这些举措尚未使用在临床环境之外获得的力或运动数据集,从而限制了治疗决策的能力。生物力学数据分析在弥合这些差距以及改善康复环境中的临床决策方面已显示出巨大潜力。
本研究对使用新型家庭锻炼设备“Slider”捕获的多维运动数据集进行了全面的聚类分析。目的是识别临床相关的运动模式,并首次回答开放性研究问题,以为个性化康复方案提供信息、预测个体恢复轨迹并评估潜在术后并发症的风险。
使用四种无监督聚类技术(k均值、层次聚类、围绕中心点划分和CLARA(聚类大型应用))对32名参与者的高维、时间相关的双侧膝关节动力学数据集进行独立分析。数据包括来自下肢活动的力、激光测量距离和光学跟踪器坐标。通过无监督聚类方法确定的最佳聚类使用轮廓分析进一步评估和比较,以量化其性能。通过使用具有协方差分析调整的逻辑回归模型,评估聚类成员的关键决定因素,包括人口统计学因素(如性别、BMI和年龄)和疼痛水平。
每个膝关节均识别出三种不同的、随时间变化的运动模式或聚类。层次聚类在右膝关节数据集上表现最佳(平均轮廓得分0.637),而CLARA对左膝关节数据集最有效(平均轮廓得分0.598)。发现了两个膝关节运动聚类成员的关键预测因素。BMI是右膝关节聚类成员的最有影响力的决定因素,较高的BMI降低了聚类2成员的概率(优势比[OR]0.95,95%CI 0.94 - 0.96;P <.001),但相对于聚类1增加了聚类3分配的概率(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.03 - 1.06;P <.001)。对于左膝关节,聚类2成员的所有预测因素均具有显著性(.001≤P≤.008),而与聚类1相比,只有BMI(P = 0.81)无法预测个体属于聚类3的可能性。性别是左膝关节的最强决定因素,男性参与者显著更可能属于聚类3(OR 3.52,95%CI 2.91 - 4.27;P <.001)。
这些动力学模式为创建个性化康复程序提供了重要见解,有可能改善患者预后。这些发现强调了无监督聚类技术在临床康复应用生物力学数据分析中的有效性。