Lim Jia Xu, Goh Cindy Siaw Lin, Wee Rambert Guan Mou, Zhang John Jiong Yang, Ong Yee Siang, Chen Min Wei
Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Mar 18;167(1):77. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06462-2.
Cerebral bypasses are technically challenging procedures essential in the neurosurgeon's armamentarium. Decreasing surgical indications leading to reduced caseload has resulted in less than ideal clinical outcomes, particularly in low to medium volume centres. We describe the neuroplastics approach to cerebral bypasses in the largest retrospective series to date and demonstrate how this approach has been able to smoothen the learning curve and achieve consistent outcomes approximating that of high-volume centres.
A retrospective study was conducted. All patients who received a bypass were classified into those with bypasses performed using the neuroplastics approach (NP group) and those performed by solo neurosurgeons (Solo group). Technical outcomes and clinical outcomes were compared.
There were 19 patients in the NP group and 50 patients in the Solo group. There were 17 patients in the NP group with double-barrel bypasses and 2 with single-barrel bypasses (total of 36 direct anastomoses) and 45 patients of the Solo group with single-barrel bypasses and 5 patients with conversion to indirect bypasses. Patients in the Solo group were more likely to experience a postoperative stroke in the bypassed territory (Solo, 17.8%; NP, 0%; p = 0.008). Although not statistically significant, there was a difference in the proportion of patients with conversion to indirect bypass (Solo, 10.0%; NP, 0%), postoperative anastomotic bleed (Solo, 8.9%; NP, 0%), and long-term patency (Solo, 93.9%; NP, 100%). Patients in the NP group had a shorter median length of stay (NP, 3 [2 - 7] days; Solo, 6 [5 - 9] days; p = 0.005) and 1-year modified Rankin scale approached significance (NP, 0 [0 - 0]; Solo, 0 [0 - 2]).
Our experience supports the adoption of a neuroplastics approach to the training and execution of cerebrovascular bypasses in small to medium volume centres. This collaboration allowed us to deliver cerebral bypasses to indicated patients with excellent outcomes.
脑旁路手术在技术上具有挑战性,是神经外科医生必备的手术技能。手术适应症的减少导致病例数量减少,进而导致临床效果不尽人意,尤其是在中低手术量的中心。我们在迄今为止最大的回顾性系列研究中描述了脑旁路手术的神经塑形方法,并展示了这种方法如何能够平滑学习曲线,并取得与高手术量中心相近的一致结果。
进行了一项回顾性研究。所有接受旁路手术的患者被分为使用神经塑形方法进行旁路手术的患者(NP组)和由独立神经外科医生进行手术的患者(单独组)。比较了技术结果和临床结果。
NP组有19例患者,单独组有50例患者。NP组有17例患者进行了双管旁路手术,2例进行了单管旁路手术(共36次直接吻合),单独组有45例患者进行了单管旁路手术,5例患者转为间接旁路手术。单独组的患者在旁路区域发生术后中风的可能性更高(单独组为17.8%;NP组为0%;p = 0.008)。虽然没有统计学意义,但在转为间接旁路手术的患者比例(单独组为10.0%;NP组为0%)、术后吻合口出血(单独组为8.9%;NP组为0%)和长期通畅率(单独组为93.9%;NP组为100%)方面存在差异。NP组患者的中位住院时间较短(NP组为3[2 - 7]天;单独组为6[5 - 9]天;p = 0.005),1年改良Rankin量表接近显著差异(NP组为0[0 - 0];单独组为0[0 - 2])。
我们的经验支持在中低手术量中心采用神经塑形方法进行脑血管旁路手术的培训和实施。这种合作使我们能够为有适应症的患者进行脑旁路手术,并取得了优异的效果。