• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信号策略与机会主义行为:来自暗网市场的见解

Signalling strategies and opportunistic behaviour: Insights from dark-net markets.

作者信息

Andrei Filippo, Veltri Giuseppe Alessandro

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

National University of Singapore and the Center for Behavioural and Implementation Science, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319794. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319794
PMID:40100870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11918442/
Abstract

The emergence of social order on darknet markets presents social scientists with a unique puzzle. Because these markets operate outside of conventional regulatory frameworks, there is a lack of legitimate oversight to monitor transactions and protect users from opportunistic behaviour. While existing literature often examines the role of reputation in increasing sales, little attention has been paid to mechanisms that mitigate fraud. This study fills this gap by examining one of the largest known darknet platforms, Alphabay, which was operational from December 2014 to July 2017. Using two Generalised Additive Models (GAMs), results show that costly signals, such as a positive reputation, sellers' seniority and escrow services, are inversely associated with fraudulent activity on darknet markets. Conversely, cheap signals, such as long product descriptions characterised by complex vocabulary and a positive tone, correlate positively with opportunistic behaviour. The study provides empirical support for signalling theory, by showing that costly signals are more difficult to fake or manipulate and can reduce fraud. Conversely, the study also demonstrates empirically that cheap signals, while potentially effective in initially generating trust among buyers, are associated with an increase in fraud and opportunistic behaviour.

摘要

暗网市场上社会秩序的出现给社会科学家带来了一个独特的难题。由于这些市场在传统监管框架之外运作,缺乏合法的监督来监控交易并保护用户免受机会主义行为的侵害。虽然现有文献经常研究声誉在增加销售额方面的作用,但很少有人关注减轻欺诈的机制。本研究通过考察已知最大的暗网平台之一“阿尔法湾”(该平台于2014年12月至2017年7月运营)填补了这一空白。使用两个广义相加模型(GAMs),结果表明,诸如良好声誉、卖家资历和第三方托管服务等成本高昂的信号与暗网市场上的欺诈活动呈负相关。相反,诸如以复杂词汇和积极语气为特征的冗长产品描述等低成本信号与机会主义行为呈正相关。该研究通过表明成本高昂的信号更难伪造或操纵且能减少欺诈,为信号理论提供了实证支持。相反,该研究还通过实证证明,低成本信号虽然在最初建立买家信任方面可能有效,但与欺诈和机会主义行为的增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/9cf6011f9ac4/pone.0319794.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/1efb042b08d4/pone.0319794.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/033ac7174c73/pone.0319794.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/5f193360951e/pone.0319794.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/99b335841efc/pone.0319794.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/9cf6011f9ac4/pone.0319794.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/1efb042b08d4/pone.0319794.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/033ac7174c73/pone.0319794.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/5f193360951e/pone.0319794.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/99b335841efc/pone.0319794.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a32b/11918442/9cf6011f9ac4/pone.0319794.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Signalling strategies and opportunistic behaviour: Insights from dark-net markets.信号策略与机会主义行为:来自暗网市场的见解
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319794. eCollection 2025.
2
Social influence in the darknet market: The impact of product descriptions on cocaine sales.暗网市场中的社会影响:产品描述对可卡因销售的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Feb;124:104328. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104328. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
Reputation transferability across contexts: Maintaining cooperation among anonymous cryptomarket actors when moving between markets.声誉在不同情境下的可转移性:在不同市场间转换时维持匿名加密市场参与者之间的合作。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102635. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102635. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Coevolution of trustful buyers and cooperative sellers in the trust game.信任博弈中信任买家和合作卖家的共同进化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044169. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
The transparency paradox. Building trust, resolving disputes and optimising logistics on conventional and online drugs markets.透明度悖论:在传统和在线药品市场建立信任、解决争端及优化物流
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
Association of Drugs for Sale on the Internet and Official Health Indicators: Darknet Parsing and Correlational Study.互联网售药与官方健康指标的关联:暗网解析与相关研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 15;8:e56006. doi: 10.2196/56006.
7
Sellers' risk perceptions in public and private social media drug markets.公共和私人社交媒体毒品市场中的卖家风险感知。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 May 1.
8
Comparing cryptomarkets for drugs. A characterisation of sellers and buyers over time.比较毒品的加密市场。对卖家和买家随时间的特征描述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
Big Data, Natural Language Processing, and Deep Learning to Detect and Characterize Illicit COVID-19 Product Sales: Infoveillance Study on Twitter and Instagram.大数据、自然语言处理和深度学习技术在检测和识别非法销售 COVID-19 产品中的应用:对 Twitter 和 Instagram 的 Infoveillance 研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Aug 25;6(3):e20794. doi: 10.2196/20794.
10
Carfentanil on the darknet: Potential scam or alarming public health threat?暗网上的卡芬太尼:潜在骗局还是令人担忧的公共卫生威胁?
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 May;91:103118. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103118. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Social influence in the darknet market: The impact of product descriptions on cocaine sales.暗网市场中的社会影响:产品描述对可卡因销售的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Feb;124:104328. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104328. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
2
Comparing cryptomarkets for drugs. A characterisation of sellers and buyers over time.比较毒品的加密市场。对卖家和买家随时间的特征描述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:176-186. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
The recovery of online drug markets following law enforcement and other disruptions.
执法及其他干扰措施实施后在线药品市场的恢复情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173:159-162. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
4
Going international? Risk taking by cryptomarket drug vendors.走向国际?加密市场药品供应商的冒险行为。
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
5
The transparency paradox. Building trust, resolving disputes and optimising logistics on conventional and online drugs markets.透明度悖论:在传统和在线药品市场建立信任、解决争端及优化物流
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Sep;35:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
The evolution of cooperation.合作的演变
Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396.