• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《手部中央屈曲痉挛性截瘫的T型神经根切断术专家共识(2024版)》

[Expert consensus on T rhizotomy for central hand flexion spasticity (2024 version)].

作者信息

Li Wenjun, Wang Shufeng

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 15;39(3):259-263. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202501021.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202501021
PMID:40101898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11919521/
Abstract

Central limb spasticity is a common complication after central nervous system injury, in which hand flexion spasticity often leads to the loss of the patient's ability to move. Reducing muscle tone and relieving spasticity are the prerequisites for restoring limb function. T rhizotomy, which has been proposed in recent years, has proven to be effective in the treatment of central hand flexion spasticity. This consensus summarizes the etiology, symptoms, functional assessment of central hand flexion spasticity, and surgical indications for T rhizotomy, surgical principles and procedures, and rehabilitation program. The standardized protocol of T rhizotomy for the treatment of central hand flexion spasticity is proposed for the reference of clinicians in the process of diagnosis and treatment, with the aim of further improving the treatment level for central hand flexion spasticity.

摘要

中枢性肢体痉挛是中枢神经系统损伤后常见的并发症,其中手部屈曲痉挛常导致患者运动能力丧失。降低肌张力和缓解痉挛是恢复肢体功能的前提条件。近年来提出的T型神经根切断术已被证明在治疗中枢性手部屈曲痉挛方面有效。本共识总结了中枢性手部屈曲痉挛的病因、症状、功能评估、T型神经根切断术的手术指征、手术原则及步骤以及康复方案。提出了T型神经根切断术治疗中枢性手部屈曲痉挛的标准化方案,供临床医生在诊疗过程中参考,旨在进一步提高中枢性手部屈曲痉挛的治疗水平。

相似文献

1
[Expert consensus on T rhizotomy for central hand flexion spasticity (2024 version)].《手部中央屈曲痉挛性截瘫的T型神经根切断术专家共识(2024版)》
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 15;39(3):259-263. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202501021.
2
Long-term functional benefits of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy.选择性背根切断术治疗痉挛型脑瘫的长期功能益处。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013 Aug;12(2):142-50. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12539. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
[Selective peripheral neurotomy and selective dorsal rhizotomy].[选择性周围神经切断术和选择性背根切断术]
Brain Nerve. 2008 Dec;60(12):1427-36.
4
Excellent functional outcome following selective dorsal rhizotomy in a child with spasticity secondary to transverse myelitis.一名因横贯性脊髓炎继发痉挛的儿童在接受选择性背根切断术后获得了良好的功能预后。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2015 Nov;31(11):2189-91. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2779-2. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
The role of selective dorsal rhizotomy in the management of post-traumatic spasticity: systematic review.选择性背根切断术在创伤后痉挛管理中的作用:系统评价
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Feb;44(1):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01255-w. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
[The use of selective dorsal rhizotomy for treating spasticity in patients with infantile cerebral palsy].[选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗小儿脑性瘫痪患者痉挛状态的应用]
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 1996 Jul-Sep(3):19-22.
7
Feasibility and effectiveness of a newly modified protocol-guided selective dorsal rhizotomy via single-level approach to treat spastic hemiplegia in pediatric cases with cerebral palsy.一种新改良的方案引导下经单节段入路选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗小儿脑瘫痉挛性偏瘫的可行性和有效性
Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Nov;35(11):2171-2178. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04194-0. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Selective posterior rhizotomy for lower extremity spasticity: how much and which of the posterior rootlets should be cut?用于治疗下肢痉挛的选择性后根切断术:应该切断多少以及哪些后根小束?
Surg Neurol. 2002 Feb;57(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(01)00680-2.
9
Effectiveness of selective dorsal rhizotomy in 2 patients with progressive spasticity due to neurodegenerative disease.选择性脊神经后根切断术治疗2例神经退行性疾病所致进行性痉挛的疗效
J Child Neurol. 2008 Jul;23(7):818-22. doi: 10.1177/0883073808316372.
10
Nerve rootlets to be sectioned for spasticity resolution in selective dorsal rhizotomy.在选择性背根切断术中,为缓解痉挛而要切断的神经根丝。
Surg Neurol. 2000 Aug;54(2):126-32; discussion 133. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00282-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical validation of automated depth camera-based measurement of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity.基于自动深度摄像机的 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估测量的临床验证。
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Aug;38(8):1091-1100. doi: 10.1177/02692155241251434. Epub 2024 May 2.
2
Upper extremity training followed by lower extremity training with a brain-computer interface rehabilitation system.采用脑机接口康复系统,先进行上肢训练,随后进行下肢训练。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Mar 4;18:1346607. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1346607. eCollection 2024.
3
Spasticity evaluation and management tools.痉挛评估和管理工具。
Muscle Nerve. 2023 Apr;67(4):272-283. doi: 10.1002/mus.27792. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
4
Performing a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test in immersive virtual reality to assess post-stroke upper limb activity.在沉浸式虚拟现实中执行简化版动作研究臂测试,以评估脑卒中后上肢活动。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Dec 3;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01114-3.
5
A brain-computer interface that evokes tactile sensations improves robotic arm control.脑机接口能唤起触觉,从而改善机械臂控制。
Science. 2021 May 21;372(6544):831-836. doi: 10.1126/science.abd0380.
6
Brain Computer Interface Treatment for Motor Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity of Stroke Patients-A Feasibility Study.脑机接口治疗脑卒中患者上肢运动功能康复的可行性研究
Front Neurosci. 2020 Oct 21;14:591435. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.591435. eCollection 2020.
7
Preferred options and evidence for upper limb surgery for spasticity in cerebral palsy, stroke, and brain injury.脑瘫、中风和脑损伤上肢痉挛的手术治疗选择及证据。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jan;45(1):34-42. doi: 10.1177/1753193419878973. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
Clinical implications of motor deficits related to brain tumors.与脑肿瘤相关的运动功能障碍的临床意义。
Neurooncol Pract. 2015 Dec;2(4):179-184. doi: 10.1093/nop/npv017. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
Management of Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Upper Extremity Spasticity.脊髓损伤所致上肢痉挛的管理
Hand Clin. 2018 Nov;34(4):555-565. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
10
Common Etiologies of Upper Extremity Spasticity.上肢痉挛的常见病因。
Hand Clin. 2018 Nov;34(4):437-443. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Aug 18.