La Monaca Gerardo, Pranno Nicola, Patini Romeo, Polimeni Antonella, Cordaro Massimo, Cristalli Maria Paola
Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Head, Neck and Sense Organs, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
J Oral Pathol Med. 2025 May;54(5):267-282. doi: 10.1111/jop.13612. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
Several biomarkers in peri-implant crevicular fluid have been studied to diagnose peri-implant diseases with inconclusive results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively compare data on the levels of biological components in peri-implant crevicular fluid collected from healthy and diseased implants to identify reliable biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring peri-implant disease.
The search strategy included studies comparing biomarker levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid between healthy and diseased implants through electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library), grey literature, and hand-searching relevant journals and reference lists of pertinent papers. A two-stage screening was performed in duplicate and independently. In the first stage, titles and abstracts that fulfilled eligibility criteria were screened. In the second stage, a full-text analysis was conducted to verify eligibility. All articles meeting the inclusion criteria underwent data extraction and quality assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted on studies with similar comparisons and outcome measures.
After screening the titles and abstracts, out of 100 potentially relevant papers identified for full-text evaluation, 49 were excluded, 51 were included in the qualitative analysis, and 18 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Among 96 biomarkers assessed, the most studied were pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17), osteoclastogenic-related factors (RANK, RANKL, and OPG), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10), chemokines (IL-8, MIP-1α/CCL3, and MIP-3α/CCL-20), and enzymes (MMP-8, Cat-K, AST, and ALT).
Meta-analyses comparing data from healthy patients and those with peri-implantitis or mucositis and between patients with mucositis and those with peri-implantitis showed a moderate predictive value of IL-1ß, VEGF, cortisol, and sRANKL/OPG for peri-implantitis.
人们已经对种植体周围龈沟液中的几种生物标志物进行了研究,以诊断种植体周围疾病,但结果尚无定论。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在全面比较从健康种植体和患病种植体收集的种植体周围龈沟液中生物成分水平的数据,以确定用于诊断和监测种植体周围疾病的可靠生物标志物。
检索策略包括通过电子数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆)、灰色文献以及手工检索相关期刊和相关论文的参考文献列表,来比较健康种植体和患病种植体周围龈沟液中生物标志物水平的研究。进行了两阶段的重复独立筛选。在第一阶段,筛选符合纳入标准的标题和摘要。在第二阶段,进行全文分析以核实纳入资格。所有符合纳入标准的文章都进行了数据提取和质量评估。对具有相似比较和结局指标的研究进行荟萃分析。
在筛选标题和摘要后,在确定进行全文评估的100篇潜在相关论文中,排除了49篇,51篇纳入定性分析,18篇纳入定量综合分析。在评估的96种生物标志物中,研究最多的是促炎细胞因子(IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α和IL-17)、破骨细胞生成相关因子(RANK、RANKL和OPG)、抗炎细胞因子(IL-10)、趋化因子(IL-8、MIP-1α/CCL3和MIP-3α/CCL-20)以及酶(MMP-8、组织蛋白酶K、AST和ALT)。
比较健康患者与种植体周围炎或黏膜炎患者以及黏膜炎患者与种植体周围炎患者数据的荟萃分析表明,IL-1β、VEGF、皮质醇和sRANKL/OPG对种植体周围炎具有中等预测价值。